Cargando…

Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Major bile duct injury (BDI) after cholecystectomy generally requires surgical reconstruction by means of hepaticojejunostomy. However, there is controversy regarding the optimal timing of surgical reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Embase and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreuder, A. M., Nunez Vas, B. C., Booij, K. A. C., van Dieren, S., Besselink, M. G., Busch, O. R., van Gulik, T. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50321
_version_ 1783589276193128448
author Schreuder, A. M.
Nunez Vas, B. C.
Booij, K. A. C.
van Dieren, S.
Besselink, M. G.
Busch, O. R.
van Gulik, T. M.
author_facet Schreuder, A. M.
Nunez Vas, B. C.
Booij, K. A. C.
van Dieren, S.
Besselink, M. G.
Busch, O. R.
van Gulik, T. M.
author_sort Schreuder, A. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Major bile duct injury (BDI) after cholecystectomy generally requires surgical reconstruction by means of hepaticojejunostomy. However, there is controversy regarding the optimal timing of surgical reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies published between 1990 and 2018 reporting on the timing of hepaticojejunostomy for BDI (PROSPERO registration CRD42018106611). The main outcomes were postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality and anastomotic stricture. When individual patient data were available, time intervals of these studies were attuned to render these comparable with other studies. Data for comparable time intervals were pooled using a random‐effects model. In addition, data for all included studies were pooled using a generalized linear model. RESULTS: Some 21 studies were included, representing 2484 patients. In these studies, 15 different time intervals were used. Eight studies used the time intervals of less than 14 days (early), 14 days to 6 weeks (intermediate) and more than 6 weeks (delayed). Meta‐analysis revealed a higher risk of postoperative morbidity in the intermediate interval (early versus intermediate: risk ratio (RR) 0·73, 95 per cent c.i. 0·54 to 0·98; intermediate versus delayed: RR 1·50, 1·16 to 1·93). Stricture rate was lowest in the delayed interval group (intermediate versus delayed: RR 1·53, 1·07 to 2·20). Postoperative mortality did not differ within time intervals. The additional analysis demonstrated increased odds of postoperative morbidity for reconstruction between 2 and 6 weeks, and decreased odds of anastomotic stricture for delayed reconstruction. CONCLUSION: This meta‐analysis found that surgical reconstruction of BDI between 2 and 6 weeks should be avoided as this was associated with higher risk of postoperative morbidity and hepaticojejunostomy stricture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7528508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75285082020-10-05 Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis Schreuder, A. M. Nunez Vas, B. C. Booij, K. A. C. van Dieren, S. Besselink, M. G. Busch, O. R. van Gulik, T. M. BJS Open Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Major bile duct injury (BDI) after cholecystectomy generally requires surgical reconstruction by means of hepaticojejunostomy. However, there is controversy regarding the optimal timing of surgical reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies published between 1990 and 2018 reporting on the timing of hepaticojejunostomy for BDI (PROSPERO registration CRD42018106611). The main outcomes were postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality and anastomotic stricture. When individual patient data were available, time intervals of these studies were attuned to render these comparable with other studies. Data for comparable time intervals were pooled using a random‐effects model. In addition, data for all included studies were pooled using a generalized linear model. RESULTS: Some 21 studies were included, representing 2484 patients. In these studies, 15 different time intervals were used. Eight studies used the time intervals of less than 14 days (early), 14 days to 6 weeks (intermediate) and more than 6 weeks (delayed). Meta‐analysis revealed a higher risk of postoperative morbidity in the intermediate interval (early versus intermediate: risk ratio (RR) 0·73, 95 per cent c.i. 0·54 to 0·98; intermediate versus delayed: RR 1·50, 1·16 to 1·93). Stricture rate was lowest in the delayed interval group (intermediate versus delayed: RR 1·53, 1·07 to 2·20). Postoperative mortality did not differ within time intervals. The additional analysis demonstrated increased odds of postoperative morbidity for reconstruction between 2 and 6 weeks, and decreased odds of anastomotic stricture for delayed reconstruction. CONCLUSION: This meta‐analysis found that surgical reconstruction of BDI between 2 and 6 weeks should be avoided as this was associated with higher risk of postoperative morbidity and hepaticojejunostomy stricture. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7528508/ /pubmed/32852893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50321 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Journal of Surgery Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Schreuder, A. M.
Nunez Vas, B. C.
Booij, K. A. C.
van Dieren, S.
Besselink, M. G.
Busch, O. R.
van Gulik, T. M.
Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis
title Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis
title_full Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis
title_short Optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis
title_sort optimal timing for surgical reconstruction of bile duct injury: meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50321
work_keys_str_mv AT schreuderam optimaltimingforsurgicalreconstructionofbileductinjurymetaanalysis
AT nunezvasbc optimaltimingforsurgicalreconstructionofbileductinjurymetaanalysis
AT booijkac optimaltimingforsurgicalreconstructionofbileductinjurymetaanalysis
AT vandierens optimaltimingforsurgicalreconstructionofbileductinjurymetaanalysis
AT besselinkmg optimaltimingforsurgicalreconstructionofbileductinjurymetaanalysis
AT buschor optimaltimingforsurgicalreconstructionofbileductinjurymetaanalysis
AT vanguliktm optimaltimingforsurgicalreconstructionofbileductinjurymetaanalysis