Cargando…

The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: EAT–Lancet Commission’s Planetary Health Diet proposed a diet that integrates nutrition and sustainability considerations, however its affordability is unknown in many country-specific contexts, including Australia. The aim of this study is to develop a healthy and sustainable food...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goulding, Tara, Lindberg, Rebecca, Russell, Catherine Georgina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00606-z
_version_ 1783589292604391424
author Goulding, Tara
Lindberg, Rebecca
Russell, Catherine Georgina
author_facet Goulding, Tara
Lindberg, Rebecca
Russell, Catherine Georgina
author_sort Goulding, Tara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: EAT–Lancet Commission’s Planetary Health Diet proposed a diet that integrates nutrition and sustainability considerations, however its affordability is unknown in many country-specific contexts, including Australia. The aim of this study is to develop a healthy and sustainable food basket modelled on the Planetary Health Diet to determine the affordability of the Planetary Health Diet basket across various socio-economic groups, and compare this affordability with a food basket modelled on the typical current diet, in an Australian setting. METHODS: An Australian-specific Planetary Health Diet basket was developed for a reference household (2 adults and 2 children) modelled on the Planetary Health Diet reference diet, and compared to a previously-developed Typical Australian Diet basket. The cost of each food basket was determined by online supermarket shopping surveys in low, medium and high socio-economic areas in each Australian state. Basket affordability was determined for the reference household by comparing the basket cost to disposable income in each socio-economic group in each state. Mann-Whitney U tests then determined if there were significant differences between the median costs and the median affordability of both baskets. RESULTS: The Planetary Health Diet basket was shown to be less expensive and more affordable than the Typical Australian Diet basket nationally, in all metropolitan areas, in all socio-economic groups across Australia (median cost: Planetary Health Diet = AUD$188.21, Typical Australian Diet = AUD$224.36; median affordability: Planetary Health Diet = 13%, Typical Australian Diet = 16%; p = < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the Planetary Health Diet to be more affordable than the Typical Australian Diet for metropolitan-dwelling Australians. IMPLICATIONS: These results can help to inform public health and food policy aimed at achieving a healthy and sustainable future for all Australians, including reductions in overweight/obesity rates and increased food security.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7528590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75285902020-10-02 The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study Goulding, Tara Lindberg, Rebecca Russell, Catherine Georgina Nutr J Research BACKGROUND/AIMS: EAT–Lancet Commission’s Planetary Health Diet proposed a diet that integrates nutrition and sustainability considerations, however its affordability is unknown in many country-specific contexts, including Australia. The aim of this study is to develop a healthy and sustainable food basket modelled on the Planetary Health Diet to determine the affordability of the Planetary Health Diet basket across various socio-economic groups, and compare this affordability with a food basket modelled on the typical current diet, in an Australian setting. METHODS: An Australian-specific Planetary Health Diet basket was developed for a reference household (2 adults and 2 children) modelled on the Planetary Health Diet reference diet, and compared to a previously-developed Typical Australian Diet basket. The cost of each food basket was determined by online supermarket shopping surveys in low, medium and high socio-economic areas in each Australian state. Basket affordability was determined for the reference household by comparing the basket cost to disposable income in each socio-economic group in each state. Mann-Whitney U tests then determined if there were significant differences between the median costs and the median affordability of both baskets. RESULTS: The Planetary Health Diet basket was shown to be less expensive and more affordable than the Typical Australian Diet basket nationally, in all metropolitan areas, in all socio-economic groups across Australia (median cost: Planetary Health Diet = AUD$188.21, Typical Australian Diet = AUD$224.36; median affordability: Planetary Health Diet = 13%, Typical Australian Diet = 16%; p = < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the Planetary Health Diet to be more affordable than the Typical Australian Diet for metropolitan-dwelling Australians. IMPLICATIONS: These results can help to inform public health and food policy aimed at achieving a healthy and sustainable future for all Australians, including reductions in overweight/obesity rates and increased food security. BioMed Central 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7528590/ /pubmed/32998734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00606-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Goulding, Tara
Lindberg, Rebecca
Russell, Catherine Georgina
The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study
title The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study
title_full The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study
title_fullStr The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study
title_full_unstemmed The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study
title_short The affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an Australian case study
title_sort affordability of a healthy and sustainable diet: an australian case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32998734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00606-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gouldingtara theaffordabilityofahealthyandsustainabledietanaustraliancasestudy
AT lindbergrebecca theaffordabilityofahealthyandsustainabledietanaustraliancasestudy
AT russellcatherinegeorgina theaffordabilityofahealthyandsustainabledietanaustraliancasestudy
AT gouldingtara affordabilityofahealthyandsustainabledietanaustraliancasestudy
AT lindbergrebecca affordabilityofahealthyandsustainabledietanaustraliancasestudy
AT russellcatherinegeorgina affordabilityofahealthyandsustainabledietanaustraliancasestudy