Cargando…
Accounting for Expected Adjusted Effect
The point that adjustment for confounders do not always guarantee protection against spurious findings and type 1-errors has been made before. The present simulation study indicates that for traditional regression methods, this risk is accentuated by a large sample size, low reliability in the measu...
Autores principales: | Sorjonen, Kimmo, Melin, Bo, Ingre, Michael |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041911 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542082 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The new accounting for expected adjusted effect test (AEAE test) has higher positive predictive value than a zero-order significance test
por: Sorjonen, Kimmo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Threshold-like associations as a function of disturbance
por: Sorjonen, Kimmo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Regression to the mean in latent change score models: an example involving breastfeeding and intelligence
por: Sorjonen, Kimmo, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Unmasking artifactual links: A reanalysis reveals No direct causal relationship between self-esteem and quality of social relations
por: Sorjonen, Kimmo, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Dangers of including outcome at baseline as a covariate in latent change score models: Results from simulations and empirical re-analyses
por: Sorjonen, Kimmo, et al.
Publicado: (2023)