Cargando…

COVID-19 and Radiology Resident Imaging Volumes–Differential Impact by Resident Training Year and Imaging Modality

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted radiology departments across the country. The pandemic has also disrupted resident education, both due to departmental social distancing efforts and reduced imaging volumes. The purpose of this study was to assess the differential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poyiadji, Neo, Klochko, Chad, LaForce, Jeff, Brown, Manuel L., Griffith, Brent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33046369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.010
_version_ 1783589347278192640
author Poyiadji, Neo
Klochko, Chad
LaForce, Jeff
Brown, Manuel L.
Griffith, Brent
author_facet Poyiadji, Neo
Klochko, Chad
LaForce, Jeff
Brown, Manuel L.
Griffith, Brent
author_sort Poyiadji, Neo
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted radiology departments across the country. The pandemic has also disrupted resident education, both due to departmental social distancing efforts and reduced imaging volumes. The purpose of this study was to assess the differential impact the pandemic had on radiology resident imaging volumes by training year and imaging modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All signed radiology resident reports were curated during defined prepandemic and intrapandemic time periods. Imaging case volumes were analyzed on a mean per resident basis to quantify absolute and percent change by training level. Change in total volume by imaging modality was also assessed. The number of resident workdays assigned outside the normal reading room was also calculated. RESULTS: Overall percent decline in resident imaging interpretation volume from the prepandemic to intrapandemic time period was 62.8%. R1s and R2s had the greatest decline at 87.3% and 64.3%, respectively. Mammography, MRI and nuclear medicine had the greatest decline in resident interpretation volume at 92.0%, 73.2%, and 73.0%, respectively. During the intrapandemic time period, a total of 478 resident days (mean of 14.5 days per resident) were reassigned outside of the radiology reading room. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a marked decrease in radiology resident imaging interpretation volume and has had a tremendous impact on resident education. The decrease in case interpretation, as well as in-person teaching has profound implications for resident education. Knowledge of this differential decrease by training level will help residency programs plan for the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7528904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75289042020-10-02 COVID-19 and Radiology Resident Imaging Volumes–Differential Impact by Resident Training Year and Imaging Modality Poyiadji, Neo Klochko, Chad LaForce, Jeff Brown, Manuel L. Griffith, Brent Acad Radiol Education RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted radiology departments across the country. The pandemic has also disrupted resident education, both due to departmental social distancing efforts and reduced imaging volumes. The purpose of this study was to assess the differential impact the pandemic had on radiology resident imaging volumes by training year and imaging modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All signed radiology resident reports were curated during defined prepandemic and intrapandemic time periods. Imaging case volumes were analyzed on a mean per resident basis to quantify absolute and percent change by training level. Change in total volume by imaging modality was also assessed. The number of resident workdays assigned outside the normal reading room was also calculated. RESULTS: Overall percent decline in resident imaging interpretation volume from the prepandemic to intrapandemic time period was 62.8%. R1s and R2s had the greatest decline at 87.3% and 64.3%, respectively. Mammography, MRI and nuclear medicine had the greatest decline in resident interpretation volume at 92.0%, 73.2%, and 73.0%, respectively. During the intrapandemic time period, a total of 478 resident days (mean of 14.5 days per resident) were reassigned outside of the radiology reading room. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a marked decrease in radiology resident imaging interpretation volume and has had a tremendous impact on resident education. The decrease in case interpretation, as well as in-person teaching has profound implications for resident education. Knowledge of this differential decrease by training level will help residency programs plan for the future. The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021-01 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7528904/ /pubmed/33046369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.010 Text en © 2020 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Education
Poyiadji, Neo
Klochko, Chad
LaForce, Jeff
Brown, Manuel L.
Griffith, Brent
COVID-19 and Radiology Resident Imaging Volumes–Differential Impact by Resident Training Year and Imaging Modality
title COVID-19 and Radiology Resident Imaging Volumes–Differential Impact by Resident Training Year and Imaging Modality
title_full COVID-19 and Radiology Resident Imaging Volumes–Differential Impact by Resident Training Year and Imaging Modality
title_fullStr COVID-19 and Radiology Resident Imaging Volumes–Differential Impact by Resident Training Year and Imaging Modality
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 and Radiology Resident Imaging Volumes–Differential Impact by Resident Training Year and Imaging Modality
title_short COVID-19 and Radiology Resident Imaging Volumes–Differential Impact by Resident Training Year and Imaging Modality
title_sort covid-19 and radiology resident imaging volumes–differential impact by resident training year and imaging modality
topic Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7528904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33046369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.010
work_keys_str_mv AT poyiadjineo covid19andradiologyresidentimagingvolumesdifferentialimpactbyresidenttrainingyearandimagingmodality
AT klochkochad covid19andradiologyresidentimagingvolumesdifferentialimpactbyresidenttrainingyearandimagingmodality
AT laforcejeff covid19andradiologyresidentimagingvolumesdifferentialimpactbyresidenttrainingyearandimagingmodality
AT brownmanuell covid19andradiologyresidentimagingvolumesdifferentialimpactbyresidenttrainingyearandimagingmodality
AT griffithbrent covid19andradiologyresidentimagingvolumesdifferentialimpactbyresidenttrainingyearandimagingmodality