Cargando…

Seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: Is it alarming? Our experience from a tertiary care center in India

INTRODUCTION: Many centers for sexually transmitted infections in India perform only a single screening assay for diagnosis of syphilis which may yield biological false positive (BFP) reactions. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the true picture of seroprevalence of syphilis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patwardhan, Vrushali Vishwas, Bhattar, Sonali, Bhalla, Preena, Rawat, Deepti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062981
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7184.194317
_version_ 1783589378841378816
author Patwardhan, Vrushali Vishwas
Bhattar, Sonali
Bhalla, Preena
Rawat, Deepti
author_facet Patwardhan, Vrushali Vishwas
Bhattar, Sonali
Bhalla, Preena
Rawat, Deepti
author_sort Patwardhan, Vrushali Vishwas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many centers for sexually transmitted infections in India perform only a single screening assay for diagnosis of syphilis which may yield biological false positive (BFP) reactions. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the true picture of seroprevalence of syphilis and BFP reactions in different patient groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57,308 serial serum samples obtained over a period of 5 years from different patient groups were screened by venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test both qualitatively and quantitatively. VDRL reactive sera were confirmed by Treponema pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) test. RESULTS: The overall seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test was 1.27%, and BFP rate in test population was 0.14%. The rate of BFP reactions among total tested male (0.44%) and female (0.1%) patients differs significantly. Out of 733 VDRL reactive samples, 81 were BFP, i.e., BFP reaction is occurring at a frequency of 11% of the total VDRL reactive samples (ratio of 8:1 for true positives/BFP). Similarly, among antenatal cases, almost 24% of the total VDRL reactive samples were BFP, or for every 116 true positives, there were 37 (almost one-third) BFP. CONCLUSION: Although the overall seroprevalence of syphilis is low; the frequency of occurrence of BFP reactions is quite alarming. Hence, treponemal test must be used for confirmation of VDRL reactive sera.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7529168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75291682020-10-13 Seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: Is it alarming? Our experience from a tertiary care center in India Patwardhan, Vrushali Vishwas Bhattar, Sonali Bhalla, Preena Rawat, Deepti Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS Original Article INTRODUCTION: Many centers for sexually transmitted infections in India perform only a single screening assay for diagnosis of syphilis which may yield biological false positive (BFP) reactions. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the true picture of seroprevalence of syphilis and BFP reactions in different patient groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57,308 serial serum samples obtained over a period of 5 years from different patient groups were screened by venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test both qualitatively and quantitatively. VDRL reactive sera were confirmed by Treponema pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) test. RESULTS: The overall seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test was 1.27%, and BFP rate in test population was 0.14%. The rate of BFP reactions among total tested male (0.44%) and female (0.1%) patients differs significantly. Out of 733 VDRL reactive samples, 81 were BFP, i.e., BFP reaction is occurring at a frequency of 11% of the total VDRL reactive samples (ratio of 8:1 for true positives/BFP). Similarly, among antenatal cases, almost 24% of the total VDRL reactive samples were BFP, or for every 116 true positives, there were 37 (almost one-third) BFP. CONCLUSION: Although the overall seroprevalence of syphilis is low; the frequency of occurrence of BFP reactions is quite alarming. Hence, treponemal test must be used for confirmation of VDRL reactive sera. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7529168/ /pubmed/33062981 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7184.194317 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patwardhan, Vrushali Vishwas
Bhattar, Sonali
Bhalla, Preena
Rawat, Deepti
Seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: Is it alarming? Our experience from a tertiary care center in India
title Seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: Is it alarming? Our experience from a tertiary care center in India
title_full Seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: Is it alarming? Our experience from a tertiary care center in India
title_fullStr Seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: Is it alarming? Our experience from a tertiary care center in India
title_full_unstemmed Seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: Is it alarming? Our experience from a tertiary care center in India
title_short Seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: Is it alarming? Our experience from a tertiary care center in India
title_sort seroprevalence of syphilis by vdrl test and biological false positive reactions in different patient populations: is it alarming? our experience from a tertiary care center in india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062981
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7184.194317
work_keys_str_mv AT patwardhanvrushalivishwas seroprevalenceofsyphilisbyvdrltestandbiologicalfalsepositivereactionsindifferentpatientpopulationsisitalarmingourexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinindia
AT bhattarsonali seroprevalenceofsyphilisbyvdrltestandbiologicalfalsepositivereactionsindifferentpatientpopulationsisitalarmingourexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinindia
AT bhallapreena seroprevalenceofsyphilisbyvdrltestandbiologicalfalsepositivereactionsindifferentpatientpopulationsisitalarmingourexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinindia
AT rawatdeepti seroprevalenceofsyphilisbyvdrltestandbiologicalfalsepositivereactionsindifferentpatientpopulationsisitalarmingourexperiencefromatertiarycarecenterinindia