Cargando…

Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China

From the discourse analysis perspective, ecopolitics has experienced a discourse change from authoritarianism to democracy. This study uses theory of authoritarianism and democracy in ecopolitics to explore the impact of authoritarian ecopolitical discourse (AED) and democratic ecopolitical discours...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xinyun, Li, Mingming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239872
_version_ 1783589383916486656
author Hu, Xinyun
Li, Mingming
author_facet Hu, Xinyun
Li, Mingming
author_sort Hu, Xinyun
collection PubMed
description From the discourse analysis perspective, ecopolitics has experienced a discourse change from authoritarianism to democracy. This study uses theory of authoritarianism and democracy in ecopolitics to explore the impact of authoritarian ecopolitical discourse (AED) and democratic ecopolitical discourse (DED) on environmental quality in China. After analysis using panel data and comparison of three main regions, results suggest a negative relationship between AED of the central government and environmental quality. By contrast, a positive relationship exists between AED of local governments and environmental quality. A positive relationship exists between DED, which measures the proposals of People’s Congress deputies and Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), and environmental quality. Nevertheless, the positive effect of DED is weaker than that of AED. The impact is also different among the regions. Our interpretations are as follows. China’s current governance mechanism is a top–down decision-making mechanism, rather than a bottom–up information transmission mechanism. The concentration of power keeps decision-making power and resources away from levels with considerably accurate information and capabilities in problem solving. Therefore, we suggest that governments should change their decision-making process and exert effort to be transparent to the entire society. A bottom–up mechanism of information collection and transmission should be established, such as environmental inspection mechanism and checking on cadres’ achievements with green GDP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7529190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75291902020-10-02 Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China Hu, Xinyun Li, Mingming PLoS One Research Article From the discourse analysis perspective, ecopolitics has experienced a discourse change from authoritarianism to democracy. This study uses theory of authoritarianism and democracy in ecopolitics to explore the impact of authoritarian ecopolitical discourse (AED) and democratic ecopolitical discourse (DED) on environmental quality in China. After analysis using panel data and comparison of three main regions, results suggest a negative relationship between AED of the central government and environmental quality. By contrast, a positive relationship exists between AED of local governments and environmental quality. A positive relationship exists between DED, which measures the proposals of People’s Congress deputies and Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), and environmental quality. Nevertheless, the positive effect of DED is weaker than that of AED. The impact is also different among the regions. Our interpretations are as follows. China’s current governance mechanism is a top–down decision-making mechanism, rather than a bottom–up information transmission mechanism. The concentration of power keeps decision-making power and resources away from levels with considerably accurate information and capabilities in problem solving. Therefore, we suggest that governments should change their decision-making process and exert effort to be transparent to the entire society. A bottom–up mechanism of information collection and transmission should be established, such as environmental inspection mechanism and checking on cadres’ achievements with green GDP. Public Library of Science 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7529190/ /pubmed/33002076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239872 Text en © 2020 Hu, Li http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Xinyun
Li, Mingming
Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China
title Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China
title_full Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China
title_fullStr Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China
title_full_unstemmed Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China
title_short Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China
title_sort ecopolitical discourse: authoritarianism or democracy? — evidence from china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239872
work_keys_str_mv AT huxinyun ecopoliticaldiscourseauthoritarianismordemocracyevidencefromchina
AT limingming ecopoliticaldiscourseauthoritarianismordemocracyevidencefromchina