Cargando…
On the dependence of the cardiac motion artifact on the breathing cycle in liver diffusion-weighted imaging
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the cardiac motion artifact that regularly appears in diffusion-weighted imaging of the left liver lobe might be reduced by acquiring images in inspiration, when the coupling between heart and liver might be minimal. MATERIALS AND METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239743 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the cardiac motion artifact that regularly appears in diffusion-weighted imaging of the left liver lobe might be reduced by acquiring images in inspiration, when the coupling between heart and liver might be minimal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 43 patients with known or suspected focal liver lesions were examined at 1.5 T with breath hold acquisition, once in inspiration and once in expiration. Data were acquired with a diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging sequence and two b-values (b50 = 50 s/mm² and b800 = 800 s/mm²). The severity of the cardiac motion artifact in the left liver lobe was rated by two experienced radiologists for both b-values with a 5 point Likert scale. Additionally, the normalized signal S(b800)/S(b50) in the left liver lobe was computed. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used comparing the scores of the two readers obtained in inspiration and expiration, and to compare the normalized signal in inspiration and expiration. RESULTS: The normalized signal in inspiration was slightly higher than in expiration (0.349±0.077 vs 0.336±0.058), which would indicate a slight reduction of the cardiac motion artifact, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.24). In the qualitative evaluation, the readers did not observe a significant difference for b50 (reader 1: p = 0.61; reader 2: p = 0.18). For b800, reader 1 observed a significant difference of small effect size favouring expiration (p = 0.03 with a difference of mean Likert scores of 0.27), while reader 2 observed no significant difference (p = 0.62). CONCLUSION: Acquiring the data in inspiration does not lead to a markedly reduced cardiac motion artifact in diffusion-weighted imaging of the left liver lobe and is in this regard not to be preferred over acquiring the data in expiration. |
---|