Cargando…
Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer
BACKGROUND: Anemia is one of the most impactful nutrient deficiencies in the world and disproportionately affects children in low-resource settings. Point-of-care devices (PoCDs) measuring blood hemoglobin (Hb) are widely used in such settings to screen for anemia due to their low cost, speed, and c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239931 |
_version_ | 1783589394378129408 |
---|---|
author | Nass, Stefan A. Hossain, Ilias Sanyang, Chilel Baldeh, Bakary Pereira, Dora I. A. |
author_facet | Nass, Stefan A. Hossain, Ilias Sanyang, Chilel Baldeh, Bakary Pereira, Dora I. A. |
author_sort | Nass, Stefan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anemia is one of the most impactful nutrient deficiencies in the world and disproportionately affects children in low-resource settings. Point-of-care devices (PoCDs) measuring blood hemoglobin (Hb) are widely used in such settings to screen for anemia due to their low cost, speed, and convenience. Here we present the first iteration of Aptus, a new PoCD which measures Hb and hematocrit (HCT). AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of Aptus and HemoCue® Hb 301 against an automated hematology analyzer (Medonic®) in Gambian children aged 6–35 months and the Aptus’ usage in the field. METHODS: Aptus, HemoCue® and Medonic® were compared using venous blood (n = 180), and Aptus and HemoCue® additionally using capillary blood (n = 506). Agreement was estimated using Bland-Altman analysis and Lin’s concordance. Usage was assessed by error occurrence and user experience. RESULTS: Mean Hb values in venous blood did not significantly differ between Aptus and HemoCue® (10.44±1.05 vs 10.56±0.93g/dl, p>0.05), but both measured higher Hb concentrations than Medonic® (9.75±0.99g/dl, p<0.0001). Lin’s coefficient between Aptus and Medonic® was r(c) = 0.548, between HemoCue® and Medonic® r(c) = 0.636. Mean bias between the PoCDs venous measurements was -0.11g/dl with limits of agreement (LoA) -1.63 and 1.40g/dl. The bias was larger for the comparisons between the Medonic® and both Aptus (0.69g/dl, LoA 0.92 and 2.31g/dl) and HemoCue® (0.81g/dl, LoA 0.17 and 1.78g/dl). ROC curves showed an AUC of 0.933 in HemoCue® and 0.799 in Aptus. Capillary Hb was higher with Aptus than HemoCue® (10.33±1.11g/dl vs 10.01±1.07g/dl, p<0.0001). Mean bias was 0.32g/dl with LoA of -1.91 and 2.54g/dl. Aptus‘ usage proved intuitive, yet time-to-results and cuvettes could be improved. CONCLUSION: Both PoCDs showed a relatively limited bias but large LoA. Aptus and HemoCue® showed similar accuracy, while both overestimated Hb levels. Aptus showed promise, with its operation unimpaired by field conditions as well as being able to show HCT values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7529235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75292352020-10-02 Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer Nass, Stefan A. Hossain, Ilias Sanyang, Chilel Baldeh, Bakary Pereira, Dora I. A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Anemia is one of the most impactful nutrient deficiencies in the world and disproportionately affects children in low-resource settings. Point-of-care devices (PoCDs) measuring blood hemoglobin (Hb) are widely used in such settings to screen for anemia due to their low cost, speed, and convenience. Here we present the first iteration of Aptus, a new PoCD which measures Hb and hematocrit (HCT). AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of Aptus and HemoCue® Hb 301 against an automated hematology analyzer (Medonic®) in Gambian children aged 6–35 months and the Aptus’ usage in the field. METHODS: Aptus, HemoCue® and Medonic® were compared using venous blood (n = 180), and Aptus and HemoCue® additionally using capillary blood (n = 506). Agreement was estimated using Bland-Altman analysis and Lin’s concordance. Usage was assessed by error occurrence and user experience. RESULTS: Mean Hb values in venous blood did not significantly differ between Aptus and HemoCue® (10.44±1.05 vs 10.56±0.93g/dl, p>0.05), but both measured higher Hb concentrations than Medonic® (9.75±0.99g/dl, p<0.0001). Lin’s coefficient between Aptus and Medonic® was r(c) = 0.548, between HemoCue® and Medonic® r(c) = 0.636. Mean bias between the PoCDs venous measurements was -0.11g/dl with limits of agreement (LoA) -1.63 and 1.40g/dl. The bias was larger for the comparisons between the Medonic® and both Aptus (0.69g/dl, LoA 0.92 and 2.31g/dl) and HemoCue® (0.81g/dl, LoA 0.17 and 1.78g/dl). ROC curves showed an AUC of 0.933 in HemoCue® and 0.799 in Aptus. Capillary Hb was higher with Aptus than HemoCue® (10.33±1.11g/dl vs 10.01±1.07g/dl, p<0.0001). Mean bias was 0.32g/dl with LoA of -1.91 and 2.54g/dl. Aptus‘ usage proved intuitive, yet time-to-results and cuvettes could be improved. CONCLUSION: Both PoCDs showed a relatively limited bias but large LoA. Aptus and HemoCue® showed similar accuracy, while both overestimated Hb levels. Aptus showed promise, with its operation unimpaired by field conditions as well as being able to show HCT values. Public Library of Science 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7529235/ /pubmed/33002049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239931 Text en © 2020 Nass et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nass, Stefan A. Hossain, Ilias Sanyang, Chilel Baldeh, Bakary Pereira, Dora I. A. Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer |
title | Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer |
title_full | Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer |
title_fullStr | Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer |
title_full_unstemmed | Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer |
title_short | Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer |
title_sort | hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural gambia: comparing accuracy of hemocue and aptus with an automated hematology analyzer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nassstefana hemoglobinpointofcaretestinginruralgambiacomparingaccuracyofhemocueandaptuswithanautomatedhematologyanalyzer AT hossainilias hemoglobinpointofcaretestinginruralgambiacomparingaccuracyofhemocueandaptuswithanautomatedhematologyanalyzer AT sanyangchilel hemoglobinpointofcaretestinginruralgambiacomparingaccuracyofhemocueandaptuswithanautomatedhematologyanalyzer AT baldehbakary hemoglobinpointofcaretestinginruralgambiacomparingaccuracyofhemocueandaptuswithanautomatedhematologyanalyzer AT pereiradoraia hemoglobinpointofcaretestinginruralgambiacomparingaccuracyofhemocueandaptuswithanautomatedhematologyanalyzer |