Cargando…

Association between Caesarean Delivery Types and Obesity in Pre-Adolescence

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The association between mode of delivery and childhood obesity remains inconclusive. Because few studies have separated C-section types (planned or unplanned C-section), our objective was to assess how these subtypes relate to pre-adolescent obesity. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sitarik, Alexandra R., Havstad, Suzanne L., Johnson, Christine C., Jones, Kyra, Levin, Albert M., Lynch, Susan V., Ownby, Dennis R., Rundle, Andrew G., Straughen, Jennifer K., Wegienka, Ganesa, Woodcroft, Kimberley J., Yong, Germaine J.M., Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7530127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00663-8
_version_ 1783589508913037312
author Sitarik, Alexandra R.
Havstad, Suzanne L.
Johnson, Christine C.
Jones, Kyra
Levin, Albert M.
Lynch, Susan V.
Ownby, Dennis R.
Rundle, Andrew G.
Straughen, Jennifer K.
Wegienka, Ganesa
Woodcroft, Kimberley J.
Yong, Germaine J.M.
Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E.
author_facet Sitarik, Alexandra R.
Havstad, Suzanne L.
Johnson, Christine C.
Jones, Kyra
Levin, Albert M.
Lynch, Susan V.
Ownby, Dennis R.
Rundle, Andrew G.
Straughen, Jennifer K.
Wegienka, Ganesa
Woodcroft, Kimberley J.
Yong, Germaine J.M.
Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E.
author_sort Sitarik, Alexandra R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The association between mode of delivery and childhood obesity remains inconclusive. Because few studies have separated C-section types (planned or unplanned C-section), our objective was to assess how these subtypes relate to pre-adolescent obesity. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The study consisted of 570 maternal-child pairs drawn from the WHEALS birth cohort based in Detroit, Michigan. Children were followed-up at 10 years of age where a variety of anthropometric measurements were collected. Obesity was defined based on BMI percentile (≥95th percentile), as well as through gaussian finite mixture modeling on the anthropometric measurements. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for obesity comparing planned and unplanned C-sections to vaginal deliveries were computed, which utilized inverse probability weights to account for loss to follow-up and multiple imputation for covariate missingness. Mediation models were fit to examine the mediation role of breastfeeding. RESULTS: After adjusting for marital status, maternal race, prenatal tobacco smoke exposure, maternal age, maternal BMI, any hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, gestational diabetes, prenatal antibiotic use, child sex, parity, and birthweight z-score, children born via planned C-section had 1.77 times higher risk of obesity (≥95th percentile), relative to those delivered vaginally ((95% CI)=(1.16,2.72); p=0.009). No association was found comparing unplanned C-section to vaginal delivery (RR (95% CI)=0.75 (0.45, 1.23); p=0.25). Results were similar but slightly stronger when obesity was defined by anthropometric class (RR (95% CI)=2.78 (1.47, 5.26); p=0.002). Breastfeeding did not mediate the association between mode of delivery and obesity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that children delivered via planned C-section—but not unplanned C-section—have a higher risk of pre-adolescent obesity, suggesting that partial labor or membrane rupture (typically experienced during unplanned C-section delivery) may offer protection. Additional research is needed to understand the biological mechanisms behind this effect, including whether microbiological differences fully or partially account for the association.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7530127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75301272021-03-01 Association between Caesarean Delivery Types and Obesity in Pre-Adolescence Sitarik, Alexandra R. Havstad, Suzanne L. Johnson, Christine C. Jones, Kyra Levin, Albert M. Lynch, Susan V. Ownby, Dennis R. Rundle, Andrew G. Straughen, Jennifer K. Wegienka, Ganesa Woodcroft, Kimberley J. Yong, Germaine J.M. Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E. Int J Obes (Lond) Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The association between mode of delivery and childhood obesity remains inconclusive. Because few studies have separated C-section types (planned or unplanned C-section), our objective was to assess how these subtypes relate to pre-adolescent obesity. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The study consisted of 570 maternal-child pairs drawn from the WHEALS birth cohort based in Detroit, Michigan. Children were followed-up at 10 years of age where a variety of anthropometric measurements were collected. Obesity was defined based on BMI percentile (≥95th percentile), as well as through gaussian finite mixture modeling on the anthropometric measurements. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for obesity comparing planned and unplanned C-sections to vaginal deliveries were computed, which utilized inverse probability weights to account for loss to follow-up and multiple imputation for covariate missingness. Mediation models were fit to examine the mediation role of breastfeeding. RESULTS: After adjusting for marital status, maternal race, prenatal tobacco smoke exposure, maternal age, maternal BMI, any hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, gestational diabetes, prenatal antibiotic use, child sex, parity, and birthweight z-score, children born via planned C-section had 1.77 times higher risk of obesity (≥95th percentile), relative to those delivered vaginally ((95% CI)=(1.16,2.72); p=0.009). No association was found comparing unplanned C-section to vaginal delivery (RR (95% CI)=0.75 (0.45, 1.23); p=0.25). Results were similar but slightly stronger when obesity was defined by anthropometric class (RR (95% CI)=2.78 (1.47, 5.26); p=0.002). Breastfeeding did not mediate the association between mode of delivery and obesity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that children delivered via planned C-section—but not unplanned C-section—have a higher risk of pre-adolescent obesity, suggesting that partial labor or membrane rupture (typically experienced during unplanned C-section delivery) may offer protection. Additional research is needed to understand the biological mechanisms behind this effect, including whether microbiological differences fully or partially account for the association. 2020-09-01 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7530127/ /pubmed/32873910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00663-8 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Sitarik, Alexandra R.
Havstad, Suzanne L.
Johnson, Christine C.
Jones, Kyra
Levin, Albert M.
Lynch, Susan V.
Ownby, Dennis R.
Rundle, Andrew G.
Straughen, Jennifer K.
Wegienka, Ganesa
Woodcroft, Kimberley J.
Yong, Germaine J.M.
Cassidy-Bushrow, Andrea E.
Association between Caesarean Delivery Types and Obesity in Pre-Adolescence
title Association between Caesarean Delivery Types and Obesity in Pre-Adolescence
title_full Association between Caesarean Delivery Types and Obesity in Pre-Adolescence
title_fullStr Association between Caesarean Delivery Types and Obesity in Pre-Adolescence
title_full_unstemmed Association between Caesarean Delivery Types and Obesity in Pre-Adolescence
title_short Association between Caesarean Delivery Types and Obesity in Pre-Adolescence
title_sort association between caesarean delivery types and obesity in pre-adolescence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7530127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00663-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sitarikalexandrar associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT havstadsuzannel associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT johnsonchristinec associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT joneskyra associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT levinalbertm associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT lynchsusanv associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT ownbydennisr associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT rundleandrewg associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT straughenjenniferk associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT wegienkaganesa associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT woodcroftkimberleyj associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT yonggermainejm associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence
AT cassidybushrowandreae associationbetweencaesareandeliverytypesandobesityinpreadolescence