Cargando…

Management of a delayed, post-traumatic rupture of splenic artery pseudoaneurysm in a patient with life threatening co-morbidities: A treatment challenge

INTRODUCTION: Splenic artery embolization (SAE) is an accepted intervention for patients with traumatic injury AAST III-IV in hemodynamically stable patients, splenic artery aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm (Brian and Charles, 2012). Unusual circumstances may pose different challenges in individual cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumari, Meena, Parwez, Masoom, Jain, Akash, Pandya, Bharati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7530228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.083
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Splenic artery embolization (SAE) is an accepted intervention for patients with traumatic injury AAST III-IV in hemodynamically stable patients, splenic artery aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm (Brian and Charles, 2012). Unusual circumstances may pose different challenges in individual cases. CASE PRESENTATION: A 52-year-old male on anticoagulants for past mitral valve replacement presented to us with history of blunt trauma sustained a month prior, was found to have grade IV splenic injury with delayed pseudo-aneurysmal rupture. In addition, his cardiac evaluation revealed an ejection fraction of 20%. A potential life threatening unstable cardiac status and hemodynamic irregularities accentuated due to the hemoperitoneum was an unusual challenge to deal with. After initial stabilization in ICU, the option of distal embolization of splenic artery was undertaken in a well-planned manner. DISCUSSION: Unstable cardiac condition, anticoagulant therapy and delayed pseudo aneurysmal bleed led us into undertaking this procedure as a semi-emergency with calculated risks. We discuss this case due to the complexities and dilemmas on various aspects which we faced in his management. CONCLUSION: Patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged on the third day of embolization. Our experience taught us the judicious implementation of a viable and only lifesaving option for an otherwise inoperable patient due to multiple co-morbidities and would strongly recommend this interventional radiological, relatively innocuous procedure for salvaging such patients.