Cargando…
Hunger Bias or Gut Instinct? Responses to Judgments of Harm Depending on Visceral State Versus Intuitive Decision-Making
Empirical investigation into the emotional and physiological processes that shape moral decision-making is vast and growing. Yet, relatively less attention has been paid to measures of interoception in morality research despite its centrality in both emotional and physiological processes. Hunger and...
Autores principales: | Brown, Helen, Proulx, Michael J., Stanton Fraser, Danaë |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7530233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02261 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The intuitive compass: why the best decisions balance reason and instinct
por: Cholle, Francis P
Publicado: (2012) -
Physiological markers of biased decision-making in problematic Internet users
por: Nikolaidou, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The effect of faith in intuition on moral judgment: The mediating role of perceived harm
por: Jiang, Shanshan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Gut instinct
por: Bion, Julian
Publicado: (2013) -
Intuition and Moral Decision-Making – The Effect of Time Pressure and Cognitive Load on Moral Judgment and Altruistic Behavior
por: Tinghög, Gustav, et al.
Publicado: (2016)