Cargando…

Differential susceptibility of Onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in Cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment

BACKGROUND: Ivermectin is an excellent microfilaricide against Onchocerca volvulus. However, in some regions, long term use of ivermectin has resulted in sub-optimal responses to the treatment. More data to properly document the phenomenon in various contexts of ivermectin mass drug administration (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abong, Raphael Awah, Amambo, Glory N., Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W., Njouendou, Abdel Jelil, Manuel, Ritter, Beng, Amuam Andrew, Esum, Mathias Eyong, Deribe, Kebede, Fru-Cho, Jerome, Fombad, Fanny F., Nji, Theobald Mue, Enyong, Peter Ivo, Poole, Catherine B., Pfarr, Kenneth, Hoerauf, Achim, Carlow, Clotilde K. S., Wanji, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7530974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05444-2
_version_ 1783589672934440960
author Abong, Raphael Awah
Amambo, Glory N.
Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W.
Njouendou, Abdel Jelil
Manuel, Ritter
Beng, Amuam Andrew
Esum, Mathias Eyong
Deribe, Kebede
Fru-Cho, Jerome
Fombad, Fanny F.
Nji, Theobald Mue
Enyong, Peter Ivo
Poole, Catherine B.
Pfarr, Kenneth
Hoerauf, Achim
Carlow, Clotilde K. S.
Wanji, Samuel
author_facet Abong, Raphael Awah
Amambo, Glory N.
Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W.
Njouendou, Abdel Jelil
Manuel, Ritter
Beng, Amuam Andrew
Esum, Mathias Eyong
Deribe, Kebede
Fru-Cho, Jerome
Fombad, Fanny F.
Nji, Theobald Mue
Enyong, Peter Ivo
Poole, Catherine B.
Pfarr, Kenneth
Hoerauf, Achim
Carlow, Clotilde K. S.
Wanji, Samuel
author_sort Abong, Raphael Awah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ivermectin is an excellent microfilaricide against Onchocerca volvulus. However, in some regions, long term use of ivermectin has resulted in sub-optimal responses to the treatment. More data to properly document the phenomenon in various contexts of ivermectin mass drug administration (IVM-MDA) is needed. Also, there is a need to accurately monitor a possible repopulation of skin by microfilariae following treatment. Skin snip microscopy is known to have a low sensitivity in individuals with light infections, which can be the case following treatment. This study was designed with two complementary objectives: (i) to assess the susceptibility of O. volvulus microfilariae to ivermectin in two areas undergoing IVM-MDA for different lengths of time, and (ii) to document the repopulation of skin by the O. volvulus microfilariae following treatment, using 3 independent diagnostic techniques. METHOD: Identified microfilaridermic individuals were treated with ivermectin and re-examined after 1, 3, and 6 months using microscopy, actin real-time PCR (actin-qPCR) and O-150 LAMP assays. Susceptibility to ivermectin and trends in detecting reappearance of skin microfilariae were determined using three techniques. Microscopy was used as an imperfect gold standard to determine the performance of actin-qPCR and LAMP. RESULTS: In Bafia with over 20 years of IVM-MDA, 11/51 (21.6%) direct observe treated microfilaridemic participants were still positive for skin microfilariae after 1 month. In Melong, with 10 years of IVM-MDA, 2/29 (6.9%) treated participants were still positive. The microfilarial density reduction per skin biopsy within one month following treatment was significantly lower in participants from Bafia. In both study sites, the molecular techniques detected higher proportions of infected individuals than microscopy at all monitoring time points. LAMP demonstrated the highest levels of sensitivity and real-time PCR was found to have the highest specificity. CONCLUSION: Patterns in skin mirofilariae clearance and repopulation were established. O. volvulus worms from Bafia with higher number of annual MDA displayed a lower clearance and higher repopulation rate after treatment with ivermectin. Molecular assays displayed higher sensitivity in monitoring O. volvulus microfilaridemia within six months following treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7530974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75309742020-10-05 Differential susceptibility of Onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in Cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment Abong, Raphael Awah Amambo, Glory N. Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W. Njouendou, Abdel Jelil Manuel, Ritter Beng, Amuam Andrew Esum, Mathias Eyong Deribe, Kebede Fru-Cho, Jerome Fombad, Fanny F. Nji, Theobald Mue Enyong, Peter Ivo Poole, Catherine B. Pfarr, Kenneth Hoerauf, Achim Carlow, Clotilde K. S. Wanji, Samuel BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Ivermectin is an excellent microfilaricide against Onchocerca volvulus. However, in some regions, long term use of ivermectin has resulted in sub-optimal responses to the treatment. More data to properly document the phenomenon in various contexts of ivermectin mass drug administration (IVM-MDA) is needed. Also, there is a need to accurately monitor a possible repopulation of skin by microfilariae following treatment. Skin snip microscopy is known to have a low sensitivity in individuals with light infections, which can be the case following treatment. This study was designed with two complementary objectives: (i) to assess the susceptibility of O. volvulus microfilariae to ivermectin in two areas undergoing IVM-MDA for different lengths of time, and (ii) to document the repopulation of skin by the O. volvulus microfilariae following treatment, using 3 independent diagnostic techniques. METHOD: Identified microfilaridermic individuals were treated with ivermectin and re-examined after 1, 3, and 6 months using microscopy, actin real-time PCR (actin-qPCR) and O-150 LAMP assays. Susceptibility to ivermectin and trends in detecting reappearance of skin microfilariae were determined using three techniques. Microscopy was used as an imperfect gold standard to determine the performance of actin-qPCR and LAMP. RESULTS: In Bafia with over 20 years of IVM-MDA, 11/51 (21.6%) direct observe treated microfilaridemic participants were still positive for skin microfilariae after 1 month. In Melong, with 10 years of IVM-MDA, 2/29 (6.9%) treated participants were still positive. The microfilarial density reduction per skin biopsy within one month following treatment was significantly lower in participants from Bafia. In both study sites, the molecular techniques detected higher proportions of infected individuals than microscopy at all monitoring time points. LAMP demonstrated the highest levels of sensitivity and real-time PCR was found to have the highest specificity. CONCLUSION: Patterns in skin mirofilariae clearance and repopulation were established. O. volvulus worms from Bafia with higher number of annual MDA displayed a lower clearance and higher repopulation rate after treatment with ivermectin. Molecular assays displayed higher sensitivity in monitoring O. volvulus microfilaridemia within six months following treatment. BioMed Central 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7530974/ /pubmed/33008333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05444-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abong, Raphael Awah
Amambo, Glory N.
Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W.
Njouendou, Abdel Jelil
Manuel, Ritter
Beng, Amuam Andrew
Esum, Mathias Eyong
Deribe, Kebede
Fru-Cho, Jerome
Fombad, Fanny F.
Nji, Theobald Mue
Enyong, Peter Ivo
Poole, Catherine B.
Pfarr, Kenneth
Hoerauf, Achim
Carlow, Clotilde K. S.
Wanji, Samuel
Differential susceptibility of Onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in Cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment
title Differential susceptibility of Onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in Cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment
title_full Differential susceptibility of Onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in Cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment
title_fullStr Differential susceptibility of Onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in Cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment
title_full_unstemmed Differential susceptibility of Onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in Cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment
title_short Differential susceptibility of Onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in Cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment
title_sort differential susceptibility of onchocerca volvulus microfilaria to ivermectin in two areas of contrasting history of mass drug administration in cameroon: relevance of microscopy and molecular techniques for the monitoring of skin microfilarial repopulation within six months of direct observed treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7530974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05444-2
work_keys_str_mv AT abongraphaelawah differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT amambogloryn differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT chounnandongmopatrickw differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT njouendouabdeljelil differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT manuelritter differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT bengamuamandrew differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT esummathiaseyong differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT deribekebede differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT fruchojerome differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT fombadfannyf differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT njitheobaldmue differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT enyongpeterivo differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT poolecatherineb differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT pfarrkenneth differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT hoeraufachim differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT carlowclotildeks differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved
AT wanjisamuel differentialsusceptibilityofonchocercavolvulusmicrofilariatoivermectinintwoareasofcontrastinghistoryofmassdrugadministrationincameroonrelevanceofmicroscopyandmoleculartechniquesforthemonitoringofskinmicrofilarialrepopulationwithinsixmonthsofdirectobserved