Cargando…
The outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability
PURPOSE: To evaluate protective effects of dexmedetomidine, calcitriol and their combination. METHODS: Forty Wistar-albino rats were divided into 4 groups; group of Sham (Group Sham); group of dexmedetomidine (Group DEX); group of calcitriol (Group CAL) and group of dexmedetomidineandcalcitriol (Gro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em
Cirurgia
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33027360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200090000003 |
_version_ | 1783589687068196864 |
---|---|
author | Kotanoğlu, Mustafa Sırrı Akbulut, Aylin Gürsoy, Koray Koca, Gökhan Özcan, Namık Yumuşak, Nihat Şenes, Mehmet Kırtıl, Gül Korkmaz, Meliha |
author_facet | Kotanoğlu, Mustafa Sırrı Akbulut, Aylin Gürsoy, Koray Koca, Gökhan Özcan, Namık Yumuşak, Nihat Şenes, Mehmet Kırtıl, Gül Korkmaz, Meliha |
author_sort | Kotanoğlu, Mustafa Sırrı |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate protective effects of dexmedetomidine, calcitriol and their combination. METHODS: Forty Wistar-albino rats were divided into 4 groups; group of Sham (Group Sham); group of dexmedetomidine (Group DEX); group of calcitriol (Group CAL) and group of dexmedetomidineandcalcitriol (Group DEX-CAL). Photographic analysis was used for macroscopic analysis and perfusion analyses were evaluated by scintigraphy. Additionally, tissue malondialdehyde (MDA) and total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant activity (TAS) were recorded and oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated. Each flap was assessed by histopathology. RESULTS: Compared to Group Sham, the viable flap areas were higher in all treatment groups both by photographic image analyses and perfusion analyses (p<0.05). Group DEX-CAL had the highest viable flap percentage both in scintigraphic and photographic analyses; whereas Group Sham had the lowest viable flap percentage. Similarly, TAS and MDA levels were elevated and TOS levels were declined in all treatment groups compared to Group Sham (p<0.005). Histopathological analysis at flap demarcation zone confirmed neovascularization was significantly higher and edema, necrosis and inflammation were significantly lower in all treatment groups compared to Group Sham. CONCLUSION: The outcomes show that additional premedication with either dexmedetomidine or calcitriol or their combination reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury of flap area and show significant increase in the percentage of viable flap tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7531053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em
Cirurgia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75310532020-10-13 The outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability Kotanoğlu, Mustafa Sırrı Akbulut, Aylin Gürsoy, Koray Koca, Gökhan Özcan, Namık Yumuşak, Nihat Şenes, Mehmet Kırtıl, Gül Korkmaz, Meliha Acta Cir Bras Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate protective effects of dexmedetomidine, calcitriol and their combination. METHODS: Forty Wistar-albino rats were divided into 4 groups; group of Sham (Group Sham); group of dexmedetomidine (Group DEX); group of calcitriol (Group CAL) and group of dexmedetomidineandcalcitriol (Group DEX-CAL). Photographic analysis was used for macroscopic analysis and perfusion analyses were evaluated by scintigraphy. Additionally, tissue malondialdehyde (MDA) and total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant activity (TAS) were recorded and oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated. Each flap was assessed by histopathology. RESULTS: Compared to Group Sham, the viable flap areas were higher in all treatment groups both by photographic image analyses and perfusion analyses (p<0.05). Group DEX-CAL had the highest viable flap percentage both in scintigraphic and photographic analyses; whereas Group Sham had the lowest viable flap percentage. Similarly, TAS and MDA levels were elevated and TOS levels were declined in all treatment groups compared to Group Sham (p<0.005). Histopathological analysis at flap demarcation zone confirmed neovascularization was significantly higher and edema, necrosis and inflammation were significantly lower in all treatment groups compared to Group Sham. CONCLUSION: The outcomes show that additional premedication with either dexmedetomidine or calcitriol or their combination reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury of flap area and show significant increase in the percentage of viable flap tissue. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7531053/ /pubmed/33027360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200090000003 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kotanoğlu, Mustafa Sırrı Akbulut, Aylin Gürsoy, Koray Koca, Gökhan Özcan, Namık Yumuşak, Nihat Şenes, Mehmet Kırtıl, Gül Korkmaz, Meliha The outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability |
title | The outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability
|
title_full | The outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability
|
title_fullStr | The outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability
|
title_full_unstemmed | The outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability
|
title_short | The outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability
|
title_sort | outcomes of dexmedetomidine and calcitriol on flap viability |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33027360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200090000003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kotanoglumustafasırrı theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT akbulutaylin theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT gursoykoray theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT kocagokhan theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT ozcannamık theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT yumusaknihat theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT senesmehmet theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT kırtılgul theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT korkmazmeliha theoutcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT kotanoglumustafasırrı outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT akbulutaylin outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT gursoykoray outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT kocagokhan outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT ozcannamık outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT yumusaknihat outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT senesmehmet outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT kırtılgul outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability AT korkmazmeliha outcomesofdexmedetomidineandcalcitriolonflapviability |