Cargando…

The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer care today involves state-of-the-art biomedical treatment but can fail to address the broader psychosocial and quality-of-life (QoL) issues associated with the transition to breast cancer survivorship. This scoping review examines the evidence on the influence of psychosoci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Culbertson, Michael G., Bennett, Kathleen, Kelly, Catherine M., Sharp, Linda, Cahir, Caitriona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07389-w
_version_ 1783589692937076736
author Culbertson, Michael G.
Bennett, Kathleen
Kelly, Catherine M.
Sharp, Linda
Cahir, Caitriona
author_facet Culbertson, Michael G.
Bennett, Kathleen
Kelly, Catherine M.
Sharp, Linda
Cahir, Caitriona
author_sort Culbertson, Michael G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast cancer care today involves state-of-the-art biomedical treatment but can fail to address the broader psychosocial and quality-of-life (QoL) issues associated with the transition to breast cancer survivorship. This scoping review examines the evidence on the influence of psychosocial determinants on QoL in breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Scoping review methodology was used to: (1) identify the research question(s); (2) identify relevant studies; (3) undertake study selection; (4) extract data; (5) collate, summarise and report the results. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were conducted in the US (n = 22, 67%) and were mainly cross-sectional (n = 26, 79%). Sixteen psychosocial determinants of QoL were identified. Social support (n = 14, 42%), depression (n = 7, 21%) and future appraisal and perspective (n = 7, 21%) were the most frequently investigated determinants. Twelve different QoL measures were used. A range of different measurement tools were also used per psychosocial determinant (weighted average = 6). The 14 studies that measured the influence of social support on QoL employed 10 different measures of social support and 7 different measures of QoL. In general, across all 33 studies, a higher level of a positive influence and a lower level of a negative influence of a psychosocial determinant was associated with a better QoL e.g. higher social support and lower levels of depression were associated with a higher/better QoL. For some determinants such as spirituality and coping skills the influence on QoL varied, but these determinants were less commonly investigated. CONCLUSION: Consensus around measures of QoL and psychological determinants would be valuable and would enable research to determine the influence of psychosocial determinants on QoL adequately. Research in other healthcare settings beyond the US is required, in order to understand the influence of organisation and follow-up clinical and supportive care on psychosocial determinants and QoL and to improve the quality of care in breast cancer survivors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7531081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75310812020-10-05 The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review Culbertson, Michael G. Bennett, Kathleen Kelly, Catherine M. Sharp, Linda Cahir, Caitriona BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Breast cancer care today involves state-of-the-art biomedical treatment but can fail to address the broader psychosocial and quality-of-life (QoL) issues associated with the transition to breast cancer survivorship. This scoping review examines the evidence on the influence of psychosocial determinants on QoL in breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Scoping review methodology was used to: (1) identify the research question(s); (2) identify relevant studies; (3) undertake study selection; (4) extract data; (5) collate, summarise and report the results. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were conducted in the US (n = 22, 67%) and were mainly cross-sectional (n = 26, 79%). Sixteen psychosocial determinants of QoL were identified. Social support (n = 14, 42%), depression (n = 7, 21%) and future appraisal and perspective (n = 7, 21%) were the most frequently investigated determinants. Twelve different QoL measures were used. A range of different measurement tools were also used per psychosocial determinant (weighted average = 6). The 14 studies that measured the influence of social support on QoL employed 10 different measures of social support and 7 different measures of QoL. In general, across all 33 studies, a higher level of a positive influence and a lower level of a negative influence of a psychosocial determinant was associated with a better QoL e.g. higher social support and lower levels of depression were associated with a higher/better QoL. For some determinants such as spirituality and coping skills the influence on QoL varied, but these determinants were less commonly investigated. CONCLUSION: Consensus around measures of QoL and psychological determinants would be valuable and would enable research to determine the influence of psychosocial determinants on QoL adequately. Research in other healthcare settings beyond the US is required, in order to understand the influence of organisation and follow-up clinical and supportive care on psychosocial determinants and QoL and to improve the quality of care in breast cancer survivors. BioMed Central 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7531081/ /pubmed/33008323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07389-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Culbertson, Michael G.
Bennett, Kathleen
Kelly, Catherine M.
Sharp, Linda
Cahir, Caitriona
The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review
title The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review
title_full The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review
title_fullStr The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review
title_short The psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review
title_sort psychosocial determinants of quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07389-w
work_keys_str_mv AT culbertsonmichaelg thepsychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT bennettkathleen thepsychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT kellycatherinem thepsychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT sharplinda thepsychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT cahircaitriona thepsychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT culbertsonmichaelg psychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT bennettkathleen psychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT kellycatherinem psychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT sharplinda psychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview
AT cahircaitriona psychosocialdeterminantsofqualityoflifeinbreastcancersurvivorsascopingreview