Cargando…
Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) in developing countries is commonly based on microscopic detection of eggs in stool samples, using the Kato-Katz (KK) method, which has a poor sensitivity for detecting light intensity infections. We compared the performance of the KK method...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01963-9 |
_version_ | 1783589702189711360 |
---|---|
author | Barda, Beatrice Schindler, Christian Wampfler, Rahel Ame, Shaali Ali, Said M. Keiser, Jennifer |
author_facet | Barda, Beatrice Schindler, Christian Wampfler, Rahel Ame, Shaali Ali, Said M. Keiser, Jennifer |
author_sort | Barda, Beatrice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) in developing countries is commonly based on microscopic detection of eggs in stool samples, using the Kato-Katz (KK) method, which has a poor sensitivity for detecting light intensity infections. We compared the performance of the KK method and real-time PCR in the framework of a randomized trial, which evaluated four novel treatments against Trichuris trichiura and concomitant STH infections. RESULTS: Two stool samples obtained from 320 participants were examined at baseline and follow-up with quadruplicate KK and PCR analyses of one of the two samples using “bead-beating” for DNA extraction. At follow-up, 80 samples were negative according to both PCR and KK and 173 were positive with both methods for any of the STHs. Relative to PCR, the calculated sensitivity of KK at follow-up was 83.6%, 43.0% and 53.8% for T. trichiura, for hookworm and for Ascaris lumbricoides, respectively. The sensitivity of PCR compared with KK at this time point was 89.1% for T. trichiura, 72.7% for hookworm and 87.5% for A. lumbricoides. Cure rates (CRs) for T. trichiura and A. lumbricoides were slightly lower with the PCR method. For hookworm CRs with KK were mostly significantly lower, namely 36.7%, 91.1%, 72.2% and 77.8% for moxidectin, moxidectin in combination with tribendimidine, moxidectin in combination with albendazole and albendazole in combination with oxantel pamoate, respectively, whereas with PCR the CRs were 8.3%, 82.6%, 37.1% and 57.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a single real-time PCR is as sensitive as quadruplicate KK for T. trichiura and A. lumbricoides detection but more sensitive for hookworm, which has an influence on the estimated treatment efficacy. PCR method with DNA extraction using the “bead-beating protocol” should be further promoted in endemic areas and laboratories that can afford the needed equipment. The study is registered at ISRCTN (no. 20398469). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7531123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75311232020-10-05 Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial Barda, Beatrice Schindler, Christian Wampfler, Rahel Ame, Shaali Ali, Said M. Keiser, Jennifer BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) in developing countries is commonly based on microscopic detection of eggs in stool samples, using the Kato-Katz (KK) method, which has a poor sensitivity for detecting light intensity infections. We compared the performance of the KK method and real-time PCR in the framework of a randomized trial, which evaluated four novel treatments against Trichuris trichiura and concomitant STH infections. RESULTS: Two stool samples obtained from 320 participants were examined at baseline and follow-up with quadruplicate KK and PCR analyses of one of the two samples using “bead-beating” for DNA extraction. At follow-up, 80 samples were negative according to both PCR and KK and 173 were positive with both methods for any of the STHs. Relative to PCR, the calculated sensitivity of KK at follow-up was 83.6%, 43.0% and 53.8% for T. trichiura, for hookworm and for Ascaris lumbricoides, respectively. The sensitivity of PCR compared with KK at this time point was 89.1% for T. trichiura, 72.7% for hookworm and 87.5% for A. lumbricoides. Cure rates (CRs) for T. trichiura and A. lumbricoides were slightly lower with the PCR method. For hookworm CRs with KK were mostly significantly lower, namely 36.7%, 91.1%, 72.2% and 77.8% for moxidectin, moxidectin in combination with tribendimidine, moxidectin in combination with albendazole and albendazole in combination with oxantel pamoate, respectively, whereas with PCR the CRs were 8.3%, 82.6%, 37.1% and 57.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a single real-time PCR is as sensitive as quadruplicate KK for T. trichiura and A. lumbricoides detection but more sensitive for hookworm, which has an influence on the estimated treatment efficacy. PCR method with DNA extraction using the “bead-beating protocol” should be further promoted in endemic areas and laboratories that can afford the needed equipment. The study is registered at ISRCTN (no. 20398469). BioMed Central 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7531123/ /pubmed/33008301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01963-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Barda, Beatrice Schindler, Christian Wampfler, Rahel Ame, Shaali Ali, Said M. Keiser, Jennifer Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of real-time PCR and the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of real-time pcr and the kato-katz method for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and assessment of cure in a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01963-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bardabeatrice comparisonofrealtimepcrandthekatokatzmethodforthediagnosisofsoiltransmittedhelminthiasisandassessmentofcureinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schindlerchristian comparisonofrealtimepcrandthekatokatzmethodforthediagnosisofsoiltransmittedhelminthiasisandassessmentofcureinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wampflerrahel comparisonofrealtimepcrandthekatokatzmethodforthediagnosisofsoiltransmittedhelminthiasisandassessmentofcureinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ameshaali comparisonofrealtimepcrandthekatokatzmethodforthediagnosisofsoiltransmittedhelminthiasisandassessmentofcureinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT alisaidm comparisonofrealtimepcrandthekatokatzmethodforthediagnosisofsoiltransmittedhelminthiasisandassessmentofcureinarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT keiserjennifer comparisonofrealtimepcrandthekatokatzmethodforthediagnosisofsoiltransmittedhelminthiasisandassessmentofcureinarandomizedcontrolledtrial |