Cargando…

Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of current systemic combination therapies for patients with mHSPC and help select candidates for optimal treatment. Methods: Databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial.gov were searched for eligibl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Junru, Ni, Yuchao, Sun, Guangxi, Liao, Banghua, Zhang, Xingming, Zhao, Jinge, Zhu, Sha, Wang, Zhipeng, Shen, Pengfei, Zeng, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.519388
_version_ 1783589713882382336
author Chen, Junru
Ni, Yuchao
Sun, Guangxi
Liao, Banghua
Zhang, Xingming
Zhao, Jinge
Zhu, Sha
Wang, Zhipeng
Shen, Pengfei
Zeng, Hao
author_facet Chen, Junru
Ni, Yuchao
Sun, Guangxi
Liao, Banghua
Zhang, Xingming
Zhao, Jinge
Zhu, Sha
Wang, Zhipeng
Shen, Pengfei
Zeng, Hao
author_sort Chen, Junru
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of current systemic combination therapies for patients with mHSPC and help select candidates for optimal treatment. Methods: Databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial.gov were searched for eligible studies. Direct and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare various systemic combination therapies and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated for treatment ranking. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the extent of metastasis. Adverse events (AEs) were compared among the effective treatments. Results: Ten trials with 16 publications were included in this network meta-analysis. Direct and network meta-analysis consistently suggested that androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide could significantly improve overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) compared to ADT alone in men with mHSPC. SUCRA analysis demonstrated the superiority of ADT plus abiraterone or enzalutamide over other therapies. Subgroup analyses indicated that additional abiraterone to ADT had the highest ranking in patients with high-volume diseases or visceral metastases and enzalutamide plus ADT outperformed other treatments in patients with low-volume diseases or without visceral metastases. Different combination therapies had variable AE profiles and ADT in addition with docetaxel or abiraterone had the highest risk of AEs. Conclusion: ADT plus docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide were associated with significantly improved survival in patients with mHSPC. ADT plus abiraterone or enzalutamide appeared to be the most effective treatments. Clinicians should balance the efficacy, potential AEs, and disease status to select the optimal treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7531177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75311772020-10-17 Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Chen, Junru Ni, Yuchao Sun, Guangxi Liao, Banghua Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Sha Wang, Zhipeng Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao Front Oncol Oncology Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of current systemic combination therapies for patients with mHSPC and help select candidates for optimal treatment. Methods: Databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial.gov were searched for eligible studies. Direct and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare various systemic combination therapies and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated for treatment ranking. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the extent of metastasis. Adverse events (AEs) were compared among the effective treatments. Results: Ten trials with 16 publications were included in this network meta-analysis. Direct and network meta-analysis consistently suggested that androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide could significantly improve overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) compared to ADT alone in men with mHSPC. SUCRA analysis demonstrated the superiority of ADT plus abiraterone or enzalutamide over other therapies. Subgroup analyses indicated that additional abiraterone to ADT had the highest ranking in patients with high-volume diseases or visceral metastases and enzalutamide plus ADT outperformed other treatments in patients with low-volume diseases or without visceral metastases. Different combination therapies had variable AE profiles and ADT in addition with docetaxel or abiraterone had the highest risk of AEs. Conclusion: ADT plus docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide were associated with significantly improved survival in patients with mHSPC. ADT plus abiraterone or enzalutamide appeared to be the most effective treatments. Clinicians should balance the efficacy, potential AEs, and disease status to select the optimal treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7531177/ /pubmed/33072564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.519388 Text en Copyright © 2020 Chen, Ni, Sun, Liao, Zhang, Zhao, Zhu, Wang, Shen and Zeng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chen, Junru
Ni, Yuchao
Sun, Guangxi
Liao, Banghua
Zhang, Xingming
Zhao, Jinge
Zhu, Sha
Wang, Zhipeng
Shen, Pengfei
Zeng, Hao
Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of current systemic combination therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and selection of candidates for optimal treatment: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.519388
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjunru comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT niyuchao comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT sunguangxi comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT liaobanghua comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangxingming comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhaojinge comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhusha comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangzhipeng comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT shenpengfei comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zenghao comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis