Cargando…
Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of current systemic combination therapies for patients with mHSPC and help select candidates for optimal treatment. Methods: Databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial.gov were searched for eligibl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.519388 |
_version_ | 1783589713882382336 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Junru Ni, Yuchao Sun, Guangxi Liao, Banghua Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Sha Wang, Zhipeng Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao |
author_facet | Chen, Junru Ni, Yuchao Sun, Guangxi Liao, Banghua Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Sha Wang, Zhipeng Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao |
author_sort | Chen, Junru |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of current systemic combination therapies for patients with mHSPC and help select candidates for optimal treatment. Methods: Databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial.gov were searched for eligible studies. Direct and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare various systemic combination therapies and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated for treatment ranking. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the extent of metastasis. Adverse events (AEs) were compared among the effective treatments. Results: Ten trials with 16 publications were included in this network meta-analysis. Direct and network meta-analysis consistently suggested that androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide could significantly improve overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) compared to ADT alone in men with mHSPC. SUCRA analysis demonstrated the superiority of ADT plus abiraterone or enzalutamide over other therapies. Subgroup analyses indicated that additional abiraterone to ADT had the highest ranking in patients with high-volume diseases or visceral metastases and enzalutamide plus ADT outperformed other treatments in patients with low-volume diseases or without visceral metastases. Different combination therapies had variable AE profiles and ADT in addition with docetaxel or abiraterone had the highest risk of AEs. Conclusion: ADT plus docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide were associated with significantly improved survival in patients with mHSPC. ADT plus abiraterone or enzalutamide appeared to be the most effective treatments. Clinicians should balance the efficacy, potential AEs, and disease status to select the optimal treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7531177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75311772020-10-17 Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Chen, Junru Ni, Yuchao Sun, Guangxi Liao, Banghua Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Sha Wang, Zhipeng Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao Front Oncol Oncology Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of current systemic combination therapies for patients with mHSPC and help select candidates for optimal treatment. Methods: Databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial.gov were searched for eligible studies. Direct and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare various systemic combination therapies and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated for treatment ranking. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the extent of metastasis. Adverse events (AEs) were compared among the effective treatments. Results: Ten trials with 16 publications were included in this network meta-analysis. Direct and network meta-analysis consistently suggested that androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide could significantly improve overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) compared to ADT alone in men with mHSPC. SUCRA analysis demonstrated the superiority of ADT plus abiraterone or enzalutamide over other therapies. Subgroup analyses indicated that additional abiraterone to ADT had the highest ranking in patients with high-volume diseases or visceral metastases and enzalutamide plus ADT outperformed other treatments in patients with low-volume diseases or without visceral metastases. Different combination therapies had variable AE profiles and ADT in addition with docetaxel or abiraterone had the highest risk of AEs. Conclusion: ADT plus docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide were associated with significantly improved survival in patients with mHSPC. ADT plus abiraterone or enzalutamide appeared to be the most effective treatments. Clinicians should balance the efficacy, potential AEs, and disease status to select the optimal treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7531177/ /pubmed/33072564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.519388 Text en Copyright © 2020 Chen, Ni, Sun, Liao, Zhang, Zhao, Zhu, Wang, Shen and Zeng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Chen, Junru Ni, Yuchao Sun, Guangxi Liao, Banghua Zhang, Xingming Zhao, Jinge Zhu, Sha Wang, Zhipeng Shen, Pengfei Zeng, Hao Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Current Systemic Combination Therapies for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer and Selection of Candidates for Optimal Treatment: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of current systemic combination therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and selection of candidates for optimal treatment: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.519388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjunru comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT niyuchao comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT sunguangxi comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT liaobanghua comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangxingming comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT zhaojinge comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT zhusha comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT wangzhipeng comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT shenpengfei comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT zenghao comparisonofcurrentsystemiccombinationtherapiesformetastatichormonesensitiveprostatecancerandselectionofcandidatesforoptimaltreatmentasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis |