Cargando…

Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is still in debate. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of directional atherectomy (DA) as a primary treatment modality for ISR in SFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Sungsin, Han, Ahram, Ahn, Sanghyun, Min, Sangil, Ha, Jongwon, Jae, Hwan Jun, Min, Seung-Kee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665454
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.200017
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is still in debate. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of directional atherectomy (DA) as a primary treatment modality for ISR in SFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted. In total, 617 stents were deployed in 242 limbs for SFA diseases during the study period. ISR was identified in 29 limbs (12.0%); 14 limbs were treated with DA and 15 limbs with balloon angioplasty (BAP) alone. Technical success rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and patency rates (PRs) at 12 months, and any complications were evaluated. RESULTS: DA group included complete occlusions in 50% of patients and BAP group included in 40%. Mean improvement in the ankle-brachial index was 0.29 and 0.32, respectively (P=0.638). Technical success was achieved in all patients. The procedural success rates were 85.7% and 73.3%, respectively (P=0.651). There was no significant difference regarding residual stenosis, distal embolization, or flow-limiting dissection. Primary PRs at 1 year were 85.7% and 73.3%, secondary PRs were 100.0% and 93.3%, and TLR rates were 14.3% and 20.0% (P=0.411, 0.326, and 0.684, respectively). CONCLUSION: Short-term outcomes after DA for ISR were not different from those after BAP but showed a tendency of better primary PR and TLR. Larger multicenter prospective studies are needed to define the role of DA in ISR treatment.