Cargando…

Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is still in debate. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of directional atherectomy (DA) as a primary treatment modality for ISR in SFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Sungsin, Han, Ahram, Ahn, Sanghyun, Min, Sangil, Ha, Jongwon, Jae, Hwan Jun, Min, Seung-Kee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665454
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.200017
_version_ 1783589737047523328
author Cho, Sungsin
Han, Ahram
Ahn, Sanghyun
Min, Sangil
Ha, Jongwon
Jae, Hwan Jun
Min, Seung-Kee
author_facet Cho, Sungsin
Han, Ahram
Ahn, Sanghyun
Min, Sangil
Ha, Jongwon
Jae, Hwan Jun
Min, Seung-Kee
author_sort Cho, Sungsin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is still in debate. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of directional atherectomy (DA) as a primary treatment modality for ISR in SFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted. In total, 617 stents were deployed in 242 limbs for SFA diseases during the study period. ISR was identified in 29 limbs (12.0%); 14 limbs were treated with DA and 15 limbs with balloon angioplasty (BAP) alone. Technical success rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and patency rates (PRs) at 12 months, and any complications were evaluated. RESULTS: DA group included complete occlusions in 50% of patients and BAP group included in 40%. Mean improvement in the ankle-brachial index was 0.29 and 0.32, respectively (P=0.638). Technical success was achieved in all patients. The procedural success rates were 85.7% and 73.3%, respectively (P=0.651). There was no significant difference regarding residual stenosis, distal embolization, or flow-limiting dissection. Primary PRs at 1 year were 85.7% and 73.3%, secondary PRs were 100.0% and 93.3%, and TLR rates were 14.3% and 20.0% (P=0.411, 0.326, and 0.684, respectively). CONCLUSION: Short-term outcomes after DA for ISR were not different from those after BAP but showed a tendency of better primary PR and TLR. Larger multicenter prospective studies are needed to define the role of DA in ISR treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7531303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75313032020-10-08 Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery Cho, Sungsin Han, Ahram Ahn, Sanghyun Min, Sangil Ha, Jongwon Jae, Hwan Jun Min, Seung-Kee Vasc Specialist Int Original Article PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is still in debate. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of directional atherectomy (DA) as a primary treatment modality for ISR in SFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted. In total, 617 stents were deployed in 242 limbs for SFA diseases during the study period. ISR was identified in 29 limbs (12.0%); 14 limbs were treated with DA and 15 limbs with balloon angioplasty (BAP) alone. Technical success rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and patency rates (PRs) at 12 months, and any complications were evaluated. RESULTS: DA group included complete occlusions in 50% of patients and BAP group included in 40%. Mean improvement in the ankle-brachial index was 0.29 and 0.32, respectively (P=0.638). Technical success was achieved in all patients. The procedural success rates were 85.7% and 73.3%, respectively (P=0.651). There was no significant difference regarding residual stenosis, distal embolization, or flow-limiting dissection. Primary PRs at 1 year were 85.7% and 73.3%, secondary PRs were 100.0% and 93.3%, and TLR rates were 14.3% and 20.0% (P=0.411, 0.326, and 0.684, respectively). CONCLUSION: Short-term outcomes after DA for ISR were not different from those after BAP but showed a tendency of better primary PR and TLR. Larger multicenter prospective studies are needed to define the role of DA in ISR treatment. The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery 2020-09-30 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7531303/ /pubmed/32665454 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.200017 Text en Copyright © 2020, The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Sungsin
Han, Ahram
Ahn, Sanghyun
Min, Sangil
Ha, Jongwon
Jae, Hwan Jun
Min, Seung-Kee
Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery
title Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery
title_full Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery
title_fullStr Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery
title_full_unstemmed Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery
title_short Directional Atherectomy for Treating In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral Artery
title_sort directional atherectomy for treating in-stent restenosis of the superficial femoral artery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665454
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.200017
work_keys_str_mv AT chosungsin directionalatherectomyfortreatinginstentrestenosisofthesuperficialfemoralartery
AT hanahram directionalatherectomyfortreatinginstentrestenosisofthesuperficialfemoralartery
AT ahnsanghyun directionalatherectomyfortreatinginstentrestenosisofthesuperficialfemoralartery
AT minsangil directionalatherectomyfortreatinginstentrestenosisofthesuperficialfemoralartery
AT hajongwon directionalatherectomyfortreatinginstentrestenosisofthesuperficialfemoralartery
AT jaehwanjun directionalatherectomyfortreatinginstentrestenosisofthesuperficialfemoralartery
AT minseungkee directionalatherectomyfortreatinginstentrestenosisofthesuperficialfemoralartery