Cargando…
Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
The quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230605 |
_version_ | 1783589814268854272 |
---|---|
author | Karabağ, Cefa Jones, Martin L. Peddie, Christopher J. Weston, Anne E. Collinson, Lucy M. Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos |
author_facet | Karabağ, Cefa Jones, Martin L. Peddie, Christopher J. Weston, Anne E. Collinson, Lucy M. Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos |
author_sort | Karabağ, Cefa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one traditional and four deep-learning, for the semantic segmentation of the nuclear envelope of cervical cancer cells commonly known as HeLa cells. Images of a HeLa cancer cell were semantically segmented with one traditional image-processing algorithm and four three deep learning architectures: VGG16, ResNet18, Inception-ResNet-v2, and U-Net. Three hundred slices, each 2000 × 2000 pixels, of a HeLa Cell were acquired with Serial Block Face Scanning Electron Microscopy. The first three deep learning architectures were pre-trained with ImageNet and then fine-tuned with transfer learning. The U-Net architecture was trained from scratch with 36, 000 training images and labels of size 128 × 128. The image-processing algorithm followed a pipeline of several traditional steps like edge detection, dilation and morphological operators. The algorithms were compared by measuring pixel-based segmentation accuracy and Jaccard index against a labelled ground truth. The results indicated a superior performance of the traditional algorithm (Accuracy = 99%, Jaccard = 93%) over the deep learning architectures: VGG16 (93%, 90%), ResNet18 (94%, 88%), Inception-ResNet-v2 (94%, 89%), and U-Net (92%, 56%). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7531863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75318632020-10-08 Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures Karabağ, Cefa Jones, Martin L. Peddie, Christopher J. Weston, Anne E. Collinson, Lucy M. Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos PLoS One Research Article The quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one traditional and four deep-learning, for the semantic segmentation of the nuclear envelope of cervical cancer cells commonly known as HeLa cells. Images of a HeLa cancer cell were semantically segmented with one traditional image-processing algorithm and four three deep learning architectures: VGG16, ResNet18, Inception-ResNet-v2, and U-Net. Three hundred slices, each 2000 × 2000 pixels, of a HeLa Cell were acquired with Serial Block Face Scanning Electron Microscopy. The first three deep learning architectures were pre-trained with ImageNet and then fine-tuned with transfer learning. The U-Net architecture was trained from scratch with 36, 000 training images and labels of size 128 × 128. The image-processing algorithm followed a pipeline of several traditional steps like edge detection, dilation and morphological operators. The algorithms were compared by measuring pixel-based segmentation accuracy and Jaccard index against a labelled ground truth. The results indicated a superior performance of the traditional algorithm (Accuracy = 99%, Jaccard = 93%) over the deep learning architectures: VGG16 (93%, 90%), ResNet18 (94%, 88%), Inception-ResNet-v2 (94%, 89%), and U-Net (92%, 56%). Public Library of Science 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7531863/ /pubmed/33006963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230605 Text en © 2020 Karabağ et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Karabağ, Cefa Jones, Martin L. Peddie, Christopher J. Weston, Anne E. Collinson, Lucy M. Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures |
title | Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures |
title_full | Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures |
title_fullStr | Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures |
title_full_unstemmed | Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures |
title_short | Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures |
title_sort | semantic segmentation of hela cells: an objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karabagcefa semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures AT jonesmartinl semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures AT peddiechristopherj semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures AT westonannee semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures AT collinsonlucym semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures AT reyesaldasoroconstantinocarlos semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures |