Cargando…

Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures

The quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karabağ, Cefa, Jones, Martin L., Peddie, Christopher J., Weston, Anne E., Collinson, Lucy M., Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230605
_version_ 1783589814268854272
author Karabağ, Cefa
Jones, Martin L.
Peddie, Christopher J.
Weston, Anne E.
Collinson, Lucy M.
Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos
author_facet Karabağ, Cefa
Jones, Martin L.
Peddie, Christopher J.
Weston, Anne E.
Collinson, Lucy M.
Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos
author_sort Karabağ, Cefa
collection PubMed
description The quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one traditional and four deep-learning, for the semantic segmentation of the nuclear envelope of cervical cancer cells commonly known as HeLa cells. Images of a HeLa cancer cell were semantically segmented with one traditional image-processing algorithm and four three deep learning architectures: VGG16, ResNet18, Inception-ResNet-v2, and U-Net. Three hundred slices, each 2000 × 2000 pixels, of a HeLa Cell were acquired with Serial Block Face Scanning Electron Microscopy. The first three deep learning architectures were pre-trained with ImageNet and then fine-tuned with transfer learning. The U-Net architecture was trained from scratch with 36, 000 training images and labels of size 128 × 128. The image-processing algorithm followed a pipeline of several traditional steps like edge detection, dilation and morphological operators. The algorithms were compared by measuring pixel-based segmentation accuracy and Jaccard index against a labelled ground truth. The results indicated a superior performance of the traditional algorithm (Accuracy = 99%, Jaccard = 93%) over the deep learning architectures: VGG16 (93%, 90%), ResNet18 (94%, 88%), Inception-ResNet-v2 (94%, 89%), and U-Net (92%, 56%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7531863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75318632020-10-08 Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures Karabağ, Cefa Jones, Martin L. Peddie, Christopher J. Weston, Anne E. Collinson, Lucy M. Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos PLoS One Research Article The quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one traditional and four deep-learning, for the semantic segmentation of the nuclear envelope of cervical cancer cells commonly known as HeLa cells. Images of a HeLa cancer cell were semantically segmented with one traditional image-processing algorithm and four three deep learning architectures: VGG16, ResNet18, Inception-ResNet-v2, and U-Net. Three hundred slices, each 2000 × 2000 pixels, of a HeLa Cell were acquired with Serial Block Face Scanning Electron Microscopy. The first three deep learning architectures were pre-trained with ImageNet and then fine-tuned with transfer learning. The U-Net architecture was trained from scratch with 36, 000 training images and labels of size 128 × 128. The image-processing algorithm followed a pipeline of several traditional steps like edge detection, dilation and morphological operators. The algorithms were compared by measuring pixel-based segmentation accuracy and Jaccard index against a labelled ground truth. The results indicated a superior performance of the traditional algorithm (Accuracy = 99%, Jaccard = 93%) over the deep learning architectures: VGG16 (93%, 90%), ResNet18 (94%, 88%), Inception-ResNet-v2 (94%, 89%), and U-Net (92%, 56%). Public Library of Science 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7531863/ /pubmed/33006963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230605 Text en © 2020 Karabağ et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karabağ, Cefa
Jones, Martin L.
Peddie, Christopher J.
Weston, Anne E.
Collinson, Lucy M.
Reyes-Aldasoro, Constantino Carlos
Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_full Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_fullStr Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_full_unstemmed Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_short Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_sort semantic segmentation of hela cells: an objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230605
work_keys_str_mv AT karabagcefa semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT jonesmartinl semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT peddiechristopherj semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT westonannee semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT collinsonlucym semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT reyesaldasoroconstantinocarlos semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures