Cargando…
Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial
The AKT inhibitor MK2206 (M) was evaluated in I-SPY 2 and graduated in the HER2+, HR−, and HR− HER2+ signatures. We hypothesized that AKT signaling axis proteins/genes may specifically predict response to M and tested 26 phospho-proteins and 10 genes involved in AKT-mTOR-HER signaling; in addition,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00189-2 |
_version_ | 1783589863891664896 |
---|---|
author | Wolf, Denise M. Yau, Christina Wulfkuhle, Julia Brown-Swigart, Lamorna Gallagher, Rosa I. Magbanua, Mark Jesus M. O’Grady, Nick Hirst, Gillian Asare, Smita Tripathy, Debu Berry, Don Esserman, Laura Chien, A. Jo Petricoin, Emanuel F. van ‘t Veer, Laura |
author_facet | Wolf, Denise M. Yau, Christina Wulfkuhle, Julia Brown-Swigart, Lamorna Gallagher, Rosa I. Magbanua, Mark Jesus M. O’Grady, Nick Hirst, Gillian Asare, Smita Tripathy, Debu Berry, Don Esserman, Laura Chien, A. Jo Petricoin, Emanuel F. van ‘t Veer, Laura |
author_sort | Wolf, Denise M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The AKT inhibitor MK2206 (M) was evaluated in I-SPY 2 and graduated in the HER2+, HR−, and HR− HER2+ signatures. We hypothesized that AKT signaling axis proteins/genes may specifically predict response to M and tested 26 phospho-proteins and 10 genes involved in AKT-mTOR-HER signaling; in addition, we tested 9 genes from a previous study in the metastatic setting. One hundred and fifty patients had gene expression data from pretreatment biopsies available for analysis (M: 94, control: 56) and 138 had protein data (M: 87, control: 51). Logistic modeling was used to assess biomarker performance in pre-specified analysis. In general, phospho-protein biomarkers of activity in the AKT-mTOR-HER pathway appeared more predictive of response to M than gene expression or total protein biomarkers in the same pathway; however, the nature of the predictive biomarkers differed in the HER2+ and TN groups. In the HER2+ subset, patients achieving a pCR in M had higher levels of multiple AKT kinase substrate phospho-proteins (e.g., pmTOR, pTSC2). In contrast, in the TN subset responding patients had lower levels of AKT pathway phospho-proteins, such as pAKT, pmTOR, and pTSC2. Pathway mutations did not appear to account for these associations. Additional exploratory whole-transcriptome analysis revealed immune signaling as strongly associated with response to M in the HER2+ subset. While our sample size is small, these results suggest that the measurement of particular AKT kinase substrate phospho-proteins could be predictive of MK2206 efficacy in both HER2+ and TN tumors and that immune signaling may play a role in response in HER2+ patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7532145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75321452020-10-19 Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial Wolf, Denise M. Yau, Christina Wulfkuhle, Julia Brown-Swigart, Lamorna Gallagher, Rosa I. Magbanua, Mark Jesus M. O’Grady, Nick Hirst, Gillian Asare, Smita Tripathy, Debu Berry, Don Esserman, Laura Chien, A. Jo Petricoin, Emanuel F. van ‘t Veer, Laura NPJ Breast Cancer Article The AKT inhibitor MK2206 (M) was evaluated in I-SPY 2 and graduated in the HER2+, HR−, and HR− HER2+ signatures. We hypothesized that AKT signaling axis proteins/genes may specifically predict response to M and tested 26 phospho-proteins and 10 genes involved in AKT-mTOR-HER signaling; in addition, we tested 9 genes from a previous study in the metastatic setting. One hundred and fifty patients had gene expression data from pretreatment biopsies available for analysis (M: 94, control: 56) and 138 had protein data (M: 87, control: 51). Logistic modeling was used to assess biomarker performance in pre-specified analysis. In general, phospho-protein biomarkers of activity in the AKT-mTOR-HER pathway appeared more predictive of response to M than gene expression or total protein biomarkers in the same pathway; however, the nature of the predictive biomarkers differed in the HER2+ and TN groups. In the HER2+ subset, patients achieving a pCR in M had higher levels of multiple AKT kinase substrate phospho-proteins (e.g., pmTOR, pTSC2). In contrast, in the TN subset responding patients had lower levels of AKT pathway phospho-proteins, such as pAKT, pmTOR, and pTSC2. Pathway mutations did not appear to account for these associations. Additional exploratory whole-transcriptome analysis revealed immune signaling as strongly associated with response to M in the HER2+ subset. While our sample size is small, these results suggest that the measurement of particular AKT kinase substrate phospho-proteins could be predictive of MK2206 efficacy in both HER2+ and TN tumors and that immune signaling may play a role in response in HER2+ patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7532145/ /pubmed/33083527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00189-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Wolf, Denise M. Yau, Christina Wulfkuhle, Julia Brown-Swigart, Lamorna Gallagher, Rosa I. Magbanua, Mark Jesus M. O’Grady, Nick Hirst, Gillian Asare, Smita Tripathy, Debu Berry, Don Esserman, Laura Chien, A. Jo Petricoin, Emanuel F. van ‘t Veer, Laura Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial |
title | Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT
inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial |
title_full | Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT
inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial |
title_fullStr | Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT
inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT
inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial |
title_short | Mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to AKT
inhibition in the I-SPY 2 breast cancer trial |
title_sort | mechanism of action biomarkers predicting response to akt
inhibition in the i-spy 2 breast cancer trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00189-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolfdenisem mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT yauchristina mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT wulfkuhlejulia mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT brownswigartlamorna mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT gallagherrosai mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT magbanuamarkjesusm mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT ogradynick mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT hirstgillian mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT asaresmita mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT tripathydebu mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT berrydon mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT essermanlaura mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT chienajo mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT petricoinemanuelf mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial AT vantveerlaura mechanismofactionbiomarkerspredictingresponsetoaktinhibitionintheispy2breastcancertrial |