Cargando…

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) delineates disease extent sensitively in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, but improved cancer outcomes are uncertain. Young women, for whom mammography is less sensitive, are expected to benefit from MRI-based resection. We identified 512 women aged ≤50...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Zexian, Amin, Amanda, Roy, Ankita, Pulliam, Natalie E., Karavites, Lindsey C., Espino, Sasa, Helenowski, Irene, Li, Xiaoyu, Luo, Yuan, Khan, Seema A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00192-7
_version_ 1783589866738548736
author Zeng, Zexian
Amin, Amanda
Roy, Ankita
Pulliam, Natalie E.
Karavites, Lindsey C.
Espino, Sasa
Helenowski, Irene
Li, Xiaoyu
Luo, Yuan
Khan, Seema A.
author_facet Zeng, Zexian
Amin, Amanda
Roy, Ankita
Pulliam, Natalie E.
Karavites, Lindsey C.
Espino, Sasa
Helenowski, Irene
Li, Xiaoyu
Luo, Yuan
Khan, Seema A.
author_sort Zeng, Zexian
collection PubMed
description Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) delineates disease extent sensitively in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, but improved cancer outcomes are uncertain. Young women, for whom mammography is less sensitive, are expected to benefit from MRI-based resection. We identified 512 women aged ≤50 years, undergoing breast-conserving treatment (BCT: tumor-free resection margins and radiotherapy) during 2006–2013 through Northwestern Medicine database queries; 64.5% received preoperative MRI and 35.5% did not. Tumor and treatment parameters were similar between groups. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for local and distant recurrences (LR and DR), using multivariable regression models, accounting for important therapeutic and prognostic parameters. LR rate with MRI use was 7.9 vs. 8.2% without MRI, aHR = 1.03 (95% CI 0.53–1.99). DR rate was 6.4 vs. 6.6%, aHR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.43–1.84). In 119 women aged ≤40, results were similar to LR aHR = 1.82 (95% CI 0.43–7.76) and DR aHR = 0.93 (95% CI 0.26–3.34). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. The use of preoperative MRI in women aged ≤50 years should be reconsidered until there is proof of benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7532157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75321572020-10-19 Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients Zeng, Zexian Amin, Amanda Roy, Ankita Pulliam, Natalie E. Karavites, Lindsey C. Espino, Sasa Helenowski, Irene Li, Xiaoyu Luo, Yuan Khan, Seema A. NPJ Breast Cancer Article Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) delineates disease extent sensitively in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, but improved cancer outcomes are uncertain. Young women, for whom mammography is less sensitive, are expected to benefit from MRI-based resection. We identified 512 women aged ≤50 years, undergoing breast-conserving treatment (BCT: tumor-free resection margins and radiotherapy) during 2006–2013 through Northwestern Medicine database queries; 64.5% received preoperative MRI and 35.5% did not. Tumor and treatment parameters were similar between groups. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for local and distant recurrences (LR and DR), using multivariable regression models, accounting for important therapeutic and prognostic parameters. LR rate with MRI use was 7.9 vs. 8.2% without MRI, aHR = 1.03 (95% CI 0.53–1.99). DR rate was 6.4 vs. 6.6%, aHR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.43–1.84). In 119 women aged ≤40, results were similar to LR aHR = 1.82 (95% CI 0.43–7.76) and DR aHR = 0.93 (95% CI 0.26–3.34). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. The use of preoperative MRI in women aged ≤50 years should be reconsidered until there is proof of benefit. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7532157/ /pubmed/33083528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00192-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zeng, Zexian
Amin, Amanda
Roy, Ankita
Pulliam, Natalie E.
Karavites, Lindsey C.
Espino, Sasa
Helenowski, Irene
Li, Xiaoyu
Luo, Yuan
Khan, Seema A.
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients
title Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients
title_full Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients
title_fullStr Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients
title_short Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients
title_sort preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00192-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zengzexian preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT aminamanda preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT royankita preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT pulliamnataliee preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT karaviteslindseyc preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT espinosasa preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT helenowskiirene preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT lixiaoyu preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT luoyuan preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients
AT khanseemaa preoperativemagneticresonanceimaginguseandoncologicoutcomesinpremenopausalbreastcancerpatients