Cargando…
Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study
BACKGROUND: The HEALing Communities Study (HCS) is designed to implement and evaluate the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention, a conceptually driven framework to assist communities in selecting and adopting evidence-based practices to reduce opioid overdose deaths. The goal of the HCS is to pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108336 |
_version_ | 1783589902182514688 |
---|---|
author | Aldridge, Arnie P. Barbosa, Carolina Barocas, Joshua A. Bush, Joshua L. Chhatwal, Jagpreet Harlow, Kristin J. Hyder, Ayaz Linas, Benjamin P. McCollister, Kathryn E. Morgan, Jake R. Murphy, Sean M. Savitzky, Caroline Schackman, Bruce R. Seiber, Eric E. E Starbird, Laura Villani, Jennifer Zarkin, Gary A. |
author_facet | Aldridge, Arnie P. Barbosa, Carolina Barocas, Joshua A. Bush, Joshua L. Chhatwal, Jagpreet Harlow, Kristin J. Hyder, Ayaz Linas, Benjamin P. McCollister, Kathryn E. Morgan, Jake R. Murphy, Sean M. Savitzky, Caroline Schackman, Bruce R. Seiber, Eric E. E Starbird, Laura Villani, Jennifer Zarkin, Gary A. |
author_sort | Aldridge, Arnie P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The HEALing Communities Study (HCS) is designed to implement and evaluate the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention, a conceptually driven framework to assist communities in selecting and adopting evidence-based practices to reduce opioid overdose deaths. The goal of the HCS is to produce generalizable information for policy makers and community stakeholders seeking to implement CTH or a similar community intervention. To support this objective, one aim of the HCS is a health economics study (HES), the results of which will inform decisions around fiscal feasibility and sustainability relevant to other community settings. METHODS: The HES is integrated into the HCS design: an unblinded, multisite, parallel arm, cluster randomized, wait list–controlled trial of the CTH intervention implemented in 67 communities in four U.S. states: Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. The objectives of the HES are to estimate the economic costs to communities of implementing and sustaining CTH; estimate broader societal costs associated with CTH; estimate the cost-effectiveness of CTH for overdose deaths avoided; and use simulation modeling to evaluate the short- and long-term health and economic impact of CTH, including future overdose deaths avoided and quality-adjusted life years saved, and to develop a simulation policy tool for communities that seek to implement CTH or a similar community intervention. DISCUSSION: The HCS offers an unprecedented opportunity to conduct health economics research on solutions to the opioid crisis and to increase understanding of the impact and value of complex, community-level interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7532345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75323452020-10-05 Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study Aldridge, Arnie P. Barbosa, Carolina Barocas, Joshua A. Bush, Joshua L. Chhatwal, Jagpreet Harlow, Kristin J. Hyder, Ayaz Linas, Benjamin P. McCollister, Kathryn E. Morgan, Jake R. Murphy, Sean M. Savitzky, Caroline Schackman, Bruce R. Seiber, Eric E. E Starbird, Laura Villani, Jennifer Zarkin, Gary A. Drug Alcohol Depend Article BACKGROUND: The HEALing Communities Study (HCS) is designed to implement and evaluate the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention, a conceptually driven framework to assist communities in selecting and adopting evidence-based practices to reduce opioid overdose deaths. The goal of the HCS is to produce generalizable information for policy makers and community stakeholders seeking to implement CTH or a similar community intervention. To support this objective, one aim of the HCS is a health economics study (HES), the results of which will inform decisions around fiscal feasibility and sustainability relevant to other community settings. METHODS: The HES is integrated into the HCS design: an unblinded, multisite, parallel arm, cluster randomized, wait list–controlled trial of the CTH intervention implemented in 67 communities in four U.S. states: Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. The objectives of the HES are to estimate the economic costs to communities of implementing and sustaining CTH; estimate broader societal costs associated with CTH; estimate the cost-effectiveness of CTH for overdose deaths avoided; and use simulation modeling to evaluate the short- and long-term health and economic impact of CTH, including future overdose deaths avoided and quality-adjusted life years saved, and to develop a simulation policy tool for communities that seek to implement CTH or a similar community intervention. DISCUSSION: The HCS offers an unprecedented opportunity to conduct health economics research on solutions to the opioid crisis and to increase understanding of the impact and value of complex, community-level interventions. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-12-01 2020-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7532345/ /pubmed/33152672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108336 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Aldridge, Arnie P. Barbosa, Carolina Barocas, Joshua A. Bush, Joshua L. Chhatwal, Jagpreet Harlow, Kristin J. Hyder, Ayaz Linas, Benjamin P. McCollister, Kathryn E. Morgan, Jake R. Murphy, Sean M. Savitzky, Caroline Schackman, Bruce R. Seiber, Eric E. E Starbird, Laura Villani, Jennifer Zarkin, Gary A. Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study |
title | Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study |
title_full | Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study |
title_fullStr | Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study |
title_short | Health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the HEALing Communities Study |
title_sort | health economic design for cost, cost-effectiveness and simulation analyses in the healing communities study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108336 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aldridgearniep healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT barbosacarolina healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT barocasjoshuaa healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT bushjoshual healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT chhatwaljagpreet healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT harlowkristinj healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT hyderayaz healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT linasbenjaminp healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT mccollisterkathryne healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT morganjaker healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT murphyseanm healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT savitzkycaroline healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT schackmanbrucer healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT seibererice healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT estarbirdlaura healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT villanijennifer healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy AT zarkingarya healtheconomicdesignforcostcosteffectivenessandsimulationanalysesinthehealingcommunitiesstudy |