Cargando…

The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a noninfectious inflammatory disease caused by allergic individuals exposed to allergens. Western medicine therapy for treating AR causes obvious adverse events, while thunder fire moxibustion (TFM) is known as a safe and effective treatment for AR. Therefore, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Ting, Xiong, Jun, Yang, Jun, Wang, Xue, Jiang, Yunfeng, Zhou, Xiaohong, Liao, Kai, Xu, Lingling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6760436
_version_ 1783589920522108928
author Yuan, Ting
Xiong, Jun
Yang, Jun
Wang, Xue
Jiang, Yunfeng
Zhou, Xiaohong
Liao, Kai
Xu, Lingling
author_facet Yuan, Ting
Xiong, Jun
Yang, Jun
Wang, Xue
Jiang, Yunfeng
Zhou, Xiaohong
Liao, Kai
Xu, Lingling
author_sort Yuan, Ting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a noninfectious inflammatory disease caused by allergic individuals exposed to allergens. Western medicine therapy for treating AR causes obvious adverse events, while thunder fire moxibustion (TFM) is known as a safe and effective treatment for AR. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TFM for treating AR. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM from inception to April 5, 2020, were searched without any language restriction. Reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality, independently. The primary outcomes were the total effective rate and the TNSS. The secondary outcomes included TNNSS, RQLQ, VAS, serum IgE, IgA, or IgG level, and adverse events. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected; methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB), and the level of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan5.3.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 18 RCTs were included, including 1600 patients. The results of this meta-analysis showed a statistically significant effect in a total effective rate of T = TFM (RR = 1.07; 95% CI [1.03, 1.12]; P = 0.45; I(2) = 0%) and T = TFM + other treatments (RR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.11, 1.25]; P = 0.03; I(2) = 53%). In addition, TFM intervention also showed significant difference in total symptom score (T = TFM + other treatments) (MD = −1.42; 95% CI [−1.55, −1.29]; P = 0.03; I(2) = 60%) in patients with AR. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence shows that TFM is safe and effective for AR. Due to the universal low quality of the eligible trials and low evidence level, we should draw our conclusions with caution. Therefore, clinical researchers should carry out more large-sample, multicentre, high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials in the future to verify the clinical efficacy of TFM in treating AR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7532423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75324232020-10-06 The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yuan, Ting Xiong, Jun Yang, Jun Wang, Xue Jiang, Yunfeng Zhou, Xiaohong Liao, Kai Xu, Lingling Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a noninfectious inflammatory disease caused by allergic individuals exposed to allergens. Western medicine therapy for treating AR causes obvious adverse events, while thunder fire moxibustion (TFM) is known as a safe and effective treatment for AR. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TFM for treating AR. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM from inception to April 5, 2020, were searched without any language restriction. Reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality, independently. The primary outcomes were the total effective rate and the TNSS. The secondary outcomes included TNNSS, RQLQ, VAS, serum IgE, IgA, or IgG level, and adverse events. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected; methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB), and the level of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan5.3.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 18 RCTs were included, including 1600 patients. The results of this meta-analysis showed a statistically significant effect in a total effective rate of T = TFM (RR = 1.07; 95% CI [1.03, 1.12]; P = 0.45; I(2) = 0%) and T = TFM + other treatments (RR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.11, 1.25]; P = 0.03; I(2) = 53%). In addition, TFM intervention also showed significant difference in total symptom score (T = TFM + other treatments) (MD = −1.42; 95% CI [−1.55, −1.29]; P = 0.03; I(2) = 60%) in patients with AR. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence shows that TFM is safe and effective for AR. Due to the universal low quality of the eligible trials and low evidence level, we should draw our conclusions with caution. Therefore, clinical researchers should carry out more large-sample, multicentre, high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials in the future to verify the clinical efficacy of TFM in treating AR. Hindawi 2020-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7532423/ /pubmed/33029169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6760436 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ting Yuan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yuan, Ting
Xiong, Jun
Yang, Jun
Wang, Xue
Jiang, Yunfeng
Zhou, Xiaohong
Liao, Kai
Xu, Lingling
The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Effectiveness and Safety of Thunder Fire Moxibustion for Treating Allergic Rhinitis: A PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effectiveness and safety of thunder fire moxibustion for treating allergic rhinitis: a prisma compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6760436
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanting theeffectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiongjun theeffectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangjun theeffectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxue theeffectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangyunfeng theeffectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouxiaohong theeffectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liaokai theeffectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xulingling theeffectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuanting effectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiongjun effectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangjun effectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxue effectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangyunfeng effectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouxiaohong effectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liaokai effectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xulingling effectivenessandsafetyofthunderfiremoxibustionfortreatingallergicrhinitisaprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis