Cargando…
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration
BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a chronic eye condition that leads to permanent vision loss in the central visual field. AMD makes reading challenging and inefficient. People with AMD often find it difficult to access, process and understand written patient education materials...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x |
_version_ | 1783589958939836416 |
---|---|
author | Fortuna, Jennifer Riddering, Anne Shuster, Linda Lopez-Jeng, Cassie |
author_facet | Fortuna, Jennifer Riddering, Anne Shuster, Linda Lopez-Jeng, Cassie |
author_sort | Fortuna, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a chronic eye condition that leads to permanent vision loss in the central visual field. AMD makes reading challenging and inefficient. People with AMD often find it difficult to access, process and understand written patient education materials (PEMs). To promote health literacy, the demands of written PEMs must match the literacy capacities of the target audience. This study aims to evaluate the readability (grade level) and suitability (appropriateness) of online PEMs designed for people with AMD. METHODS: Online PEMs were sourced from websites of national organizations providing patient education materials designed for people with AMD. The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula and the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument were used to assess the readability and suitability of PEMs. Descriptive statistics were used to compare online PEMs by organization based on national guidelines for readability level (≤ sixth grade) and the recommended suitability score (≥ 70%) for “superior” material. RESULTS: One hundred online PEMs were evaluated from websites of 16 professional organizations. The mean readability level was 9.3 (range 5.0–16.6). The mean suitability score was 53% (range 18–78%). Only six (6%) of PEMs achieved the recommended guidelines for readability level and suitability score. CONCLUSION: The majority of online PEMs designed for people with AMD were written above the recommended readability level, and below the suggested suitability score. To promote health literacy, the demands of written health information must match the reading capacities of the target audience. Heeding to evidence-based guidelines for providing written information to patients with low health literacy and low vision is beneficial for both patients and health care providers. Future research is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7532594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75325942020-10-05 Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration Fortuna, Jennifer Riddering, Anne Shuster, Linda Lopez-Jeng, Cassie BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a chronic eye condition that leads to permanent vision loss in the central visual field. AMD makes reading challenging and inefficient. People with AMD often find it difficult to access, process and understand written patient education materials (PEMs). To promote health literacy, the demands of written PEMs must match the literacy capacities of the target audience. This study aims to evaluate the readability (grade level) and suitability (appropriateness) of online PEMs designed for people with AMD. METHODS: Online PEMs were sourced from websites of national organizations providing patient education materials designed for people with AMD. The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula and the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument were used to assess the readability and suitability of PEMs. Descriptive statistics were used to compare online PEMs by organization based on national guidelines for readability level (≤ sixth grade) and the recommended suitability score (≥ 70%) for “superior” material. RESULTS: One hundred online PEMs were evaluated from websites of 16 professional organizations. The mean readability level was 9.3 (range 5.0–16.6). The mean suitability score was 53% (range 18–78%). Only six (6%) of PEMs achieved the recommended guidelines for readability level and suitability score. CONCLUSION: The majority of online PEMs designed for people with AMD were written above the recommended readability level, and below the suggested suitability score. To promote health literacy, the demands of written health information must match the reading capacities of the target audience. Heeding to evidence-based guidelines for providing written information to patients with low health literacy and low vision is beneficial for both patients and health care providers. Future research is warranted. BioMed Central 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7532594/ /pubmed/33008367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fortuna, Jennifer Riddering, Anne Shuster, Linda Lopez-Jeng, Cassie Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration |
title | Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration |
title_full | Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration |
title_fullStr | Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration |
title_short | Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration |
title_sort | assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fortunajennifer assessmentofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsdesignedforpeoplewithagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT ridderinganne assessmentofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsdesignedforpeoplewithagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT shusterlinda assessmentofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsdesignedforpeoplewithagerelatedmaculardegeneration AT lopezjengcassie assessmentofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsdesignedforpeoplewithagerelatedmaculardegeneration |