Cargando…

Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation. METHODS: Through literature retrieval, the effects of the adhesive/twill tape method, fixator method, and adhesive/twill tape–fixator alternation method on patients with tracheal intubation in the inten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Ye, Fan, Hua, Song, Xiao-Xia, Zhang, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00446-x
_version_ 1783589960658452480
author Sun, Ye
Fan, Hua
Song, Xiao-Xia
Zhang, Hua
author_facet Sun, Ye
Fan, Hua
Song, Xiao-Xia
Zhang, Hua
author_sort Sun, Ye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation. METHODS: Through literature retrieval, the effects of the adhesive/twill tape method, fixator method, and adhesive/twill tape–fixator alternation method on patients with tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) were compared. RESULTS: The fixator and alternation methods were more effective in protecting the tongue mucosa and teeth. The alternation method was superior to the other two methods in maintaining the position of the endotracheal intubation. However, the difference in facial and lip injuries between the three methods was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The fixator method can significantly reduce intraoral injury and is more suitable for older people with weak tongue mucosa and loose teeth. These are worth popularizing among a wider group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7532601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75326012020-10-05 Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults Sun, Ye Fan, Hua Song, Xiao-Xia Zhang, Hua Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation. METHODS: Through literature retrieval, the effects of the adhesive/twill tape method, fixator method, and adhesive/twill tape–fixator alternation method on patients with tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) were compared. RESULTS: The fixator and alternation methods were more effective in protecting the tongue mucosa and teeth. The alternation method was superior to the other two methods in maintaining the position of the endotracheal intubation. However, the difference in facial and lip injuries between the three methods was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The fixator method can significantly reduce intraoral injury and is more suitable for older people with weak tongue mucosa and loose teeth. These are worth popularizing among a wider group. BioMed Central 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7532601/ /pubmed/33008485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00446-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sun, Ye
Fan, Hua
Song, Xiao-Xia
Zhang, Hua
Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults
title Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults
title_full Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults
title_fullStr Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults
title_short Comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults
title_sort comparison of three fixation methods for orotracheal intubation in 95 adults
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00446-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sunye comparisonofthreefixationmethodsfororotrachealintubationin95adults
AT fanhua comparisonofthreefixationmethodsfororotrachealintubationin95adults
AT songxiaoxia comparisonofthreefixationmethodsfororotrachealintubationin95adults
AT zhanghua comparisonofthreefixationmethodsfororotrachealintubationin95adults