Cargando…

Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) or perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) is a well-established procedure for postoperative analgesia after open inguinal surgery in children. This procedure is effective and safe, especially when ultrasound is used. Data availability for comparing ultrasound-guided blocks versus wound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grosse, Bjoern, Eberbach, Stefan, Pinnschmidt, Hans O., Vincent, Deirdre, Schmidt-Niemann, Martin, Reinshagen, Konrad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33010803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01170-z
_version_ 1783589967088320512
author Grosse, Bjoern
Eberbach, Stefan
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Vincent, Deirdre
Schmidt-Niemann, Martin
Reinshagen, Konrad
author_facet Grosse, Bjoern
Eberbach, Stefan
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Vincent, Deirdre
Schmidt-Niemann, Martin
Reinshagen, Konrad
author_sort Grosse, Bjoern
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) is a well-established procedure for postoperative analgesia after open inguinal surgery in children. This procedure is effective and safe, especially when ultrasound is used. Data availability for comparing ultrasound-guided blocks versus wound infiltration is still weak. The study was designed to determine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ILIHB (US-ILIHB) on postoperative pain control in pediatric patients following a inguinal daycase surgery, compared with perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) by the surgeon. METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded trail was conducted in pediatric patients aged from 6 months to 4 years. The total number of children included in the study was 103. Patients were allocated at random in two groups by sealed envelopes. The ILIHB group recieved 0,2% ropivacain for US-ILIHB after anesthesia induction. The PWI group recieved 0,2% ropivacain for PWI performed by a surgeon before wound closure. Parameters recorded included the postoperative pain score, pain frequency, time to first analgesics and consumption of analgesics. Results: US-ILIHB significantly reduced the occurrence of pain within the first 24 h after surgery (7.7%, p = 0.01). Moreover, the pain-free interval until administration of the first dose of opioids was 21 min longer, on average (p = 0.003), following US-ILIHB compared to perifocal wound infiltration. 72% of children who received US-ILIHB did not require additional opioids, as compared to 56% of those who received PWI. CONCLUSION: Thus our study demonstrates that US-ILIHB ensures better postoperative analgesia in children and should be prioritized over postoperative PWI. TRAIL REGISTRATION: UIHBOPWIIC, DRKS00020987. Registered 20 March 2020 – Retrospectivley registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7532635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75326352020-10-05 Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) or perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study Grosse, Bjoern Eberbach, Stefan Pinnschmidt, Hans O. Vincent, Deirdre Schmidt-Niemann, Martin Reinshagen, Konrad BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) is a well-established procedure for postoperative analgesia after open inguinal surgery in children. This procedure is effective and safe, especially when ultrasound is used. Data availability for comparing ultrasound-guided blocks versus wound infiltration is still weak. The study was designed to determine the efficacy of ultrasound-guided ILIHB (US-ILIHB) on postoperative pain control in pediatric patients following a inguinal daycase surgery, compared with perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) by the surgeon. METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded trail was conducted in pediatric patients aged from 6 months to 4 years. The total number of children included in the study was 103. Patients were allocated at random in two groups by sealed envelopes. The ILIHB group recieved 0,2% ropivacain for US-ILIHB after anesthesia induction. The PWI group recieved 0,2% ropivacain for PWI performed by a surgeon before wound closure. Parameters recorded included the postoperative pain score, pain frequency, time to first analgesics and consumption of analgesics. Results: US-ILIHB significantly reduced the occurrence of pain within the first 24 h after surgery (7.7%, p = 0.01). Moreover, the pain-free interval until administration of the first dose of opioids was 21 min longer, on average (p = 0.003), following US-ILIHB compared to perifocal wound infiltration. 72% of children who received US-ILIHB did not require additional opioids, as compared to 56% of those who received PWI. CONCLUSION: Thus our study demonstrates that US-ILIHB ensures better postoperative analgesia in children and should be prioritized over postoperative PWI. TRAIL REGISTRATION: UIHBOPWIIC, DRKS00020987. Registered 20 March 2020 – Retrospectivley registered. BioMed Central 2020-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7532635/ /pubmed/33010803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01170-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grosse, Bjoern
Eberbach, Stefan
Pinnschmidt, Hans O.
Vincent, Deirdre
Schmidt-Niemann, Martin
Reinshagen, Konrad
Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) or perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study
title Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) or perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study
title_full Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) or perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) or perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) or perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study
title_short Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) or perifocal wound infiltration (PWI) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study
title_sort ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block (ilihb) or perifocal wound infiltration (pwi) in children: a prospective randomized comparison of analgesia quality, a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33010803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01170-z
work_keys_str_mv AT grossebjoern ultrasoundguidedilioinguinaliliohypogastricblockilihborperifocalwoundinfiltrationpwiinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofanalgesiaqualityapilotstudy
AT eberbachstefan ultrasoundguidedilioinguinaliliohypogastricblockilihborperifocalwoundinfiltrationpwiinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofanalgesiaqualityapilotstudy
AT pinnschmidthanso ultrasoundguidedilioinguinaliliohypogastricblockilihborperifocalwoundinfiltrationpwiinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofanalgesiaqualityapilotstudy
AT vincentdeirdre ultrasoundguidedilioinguinaliliohypogastricblockilihborperifocalwoundinfiltrationpwiinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofanalgesiaqualityapilotstudy
AT schmidtniemannmartin ultrasoundguidedilioinguinaliliohypogastricblockilihborperifocalwoundinfiltrationpwiinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofanalgesiaqualityapilotstudy
AT reinshagenkonrad ultrasoundguidedilioinguinaliliohypogastricblockilihborperifocalwoundinfiltrationpwiinchildrenaprospectiverandomizedcomparisonofanalgesiaqualityapilotstudy