Cargando…

Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Psychiatrists were surveyed to obtain an overview of how they currently use technology in clinical practice, with a focus on psychiatrists who treat patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Data were obtained using an online-only survey containing 46 questions, completed by a convenience...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauer, Rita, Glenn, Tasha, Monteith, Scott, Whybrow, Peter C., Bauer, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33009954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-00194-1
_version_ 1783589985226588160
author Bauer, Rita
Glenn, Tasha
Monteith, Scott
Whybrow, Peter C.
Bauer, Michael
author_facet Bauer, Rita
Glenn, Tasha
Monteith, Scott
Whybrow, Peter C.
Bauer, Michael
author_sort Bauer, Rita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychiatrists were surveyed to obtain an overview of how they currently use technology in clinical practice, with a focus on psychiatrists who treat patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Data were obtained using an online-only survey containing 46 questions, completed by a convenience sample of 209 psychiatrists in 19 countries. Descriptive statistics, and analyses of linear associations and to remove country heterogeneity were calculated. RESULTS: Virtually all psychiatrists seek information online with many benefits, but some experience information overload. 75.2% of psychiatrists use an EMR/EHR at work, and 64.6% communicate with patients using a new technology, primarily email (48.8%). 66.0% do not ask patients if they use the Internet in relation to bipolar disorder. 67.3% of psychiatrists feel it is too early to tell if patient online information seeking about bipolar disorder is improving the quality of care. 66.3% of psychiatrists think technology-based treatments will improve the quality of care for some or many patients. However, 60.0% of psychiatrists do not recommend technology-based treatments to patients, and those who recommend select a variety of treatments. Psychiatrists use technology more frequently when the patients live in urban rather than rural or suburban areas. Only 23.9% of psychiatrists have any formal training in technology. CONCLUSIONS: Digital technology is routinely used by psychiatrists in clinical practice. There is near unanimous agreement about the benefits of psychiatrist online information-seeking, but research on information overload is needed. There is less agreement about the appropriate use of other clinical technologies, especially those involving patients. It is too early to tell if technology-based treatments or patient Internet activities will improve the quality of care. The digital divide remains between use of technology for psychiatrists with patients living in urban and rural or suburban areas. Psychiatrists need more formal training in technology to understand risks, benefits and limitations of clinical products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7532734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75327342020-10-05 Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice Bauer, Rita Glenn, Tasha Monteith, Scott Whybrow, Peter C. Bauer, Michael Int J Bipolar Disord Research BACKGROUND: Psychiatrists were surveyed to obtain an overview of how they currently use technology in clinical practice, with a focus on psychiatrists who treat patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Data were obtained using an online-only survey containing 46 questions, completed by a convenience sample of 209 psychiatrists in 19 countries. Descriptive statistics, and analyses of linear associations and to remove country heterogeneity were calculated. RESULTS: Virtually all psychiatrists seek information online with many benefits, but some experience information overload. 75.2% of psychiatrists use an EMR/EHR at work, and 64.6% communicate with patients using a new technology, primarily email (48.8%). 66.0% do not ask patients if they use the Internet in relation to bipolar disorder. 67.3% of psychiatrists feel it is too early to tell if patient online information seeking about bipolar disorder is improving the quality of care. 66.3% of psychiatrists think technology-based treatments will improve the quality of care for some or many patients. However, 60.0% of psychiatrists do not recommend technology-based treatments to patients, and those who recommend select a variety of treatments. Psychiatrists use technology more frequently when the patients live in urban rather than rural or suburban areas. Only 23.9% of psychiatrists have any formal training in technology. CONCLUSIONS: Digital technology is routinely used by psychiatrists in clinical practice. There is near unanimous agreement about the benefits of psychiatrist online information-seeking, but research on information overload is needed. There is less agreement about the appropriate use of other clinical technologies, especially those involving patients. It is too early to tell if technology-based treatments or patient Internet activities will improve the quality of care. The digital divide remains between use of technology for psychiatrists with patients living in urban and rural or suburban areas. Psychiatrists need more formal training in technology to understand risks, benefits and limitations of clinical products. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7532734/ /pubmed/33009954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-00194-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Bauer, Rita
Glenn, Tasha
Monteith, Scott
Whybrow, Peter C.
Bauer, Michael
Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice
title Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice
title_full Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice
title_fullStr Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice
title_short Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice
title_sort survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33009954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-00194-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bauerrita surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice
AT glenntasha surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice
AT monteithscott surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice
AT whybrowpeterc surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice
AT bauermichael surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice