Cargando…
Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Psychiatrists were surveyed to obtain an overview of how they currently use technology in clinical practice, with a focus on psychiatrists who treat patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Data were obtained using an online-only survey containing 46 questions, completed by a convenience...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33009954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-00194-1 |
_version_ | 1783589985226588160 |
---|---|
author | Bauer, Rita Glenn, Tasha Monteith, Scott Whybrow, Peter C. Bauer, Michael |
author_facet | Bauer, Rita Glenn, Tasha Monteith, Scott Whybrow, Peter C. Bauer, Michael |
author_sort | Bauer, Rita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Psychiatrists were surveyed to obtain an overview of how they currently use technology in clinical practice, with a focus on psychiatrists who treat patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Data were obtained using an online-only survey containing 46 questions, completed by a convenience sample of 209 psychiatrists in 19 countries. Descriptive statistics, and analyses of linear associations and to remove country heterogeneity were calculated. RESULTS: Virtually all psychiatrists seek information online with many benefits, but some experience information overload. 75.2% of psychiatrists use an EMR/EHR at work, and 64.6% communicate with patients using a new technology, primarily email (48.8%). 66.0% do not ask patients if they use the Internet in relation to bipolar disorder. 67.3% of psychiatrists feel it is too early to tell if patient online information seeking about bipolar disorder is improving the quality of care. 66.3% of psychiatrists think technology-based treatments will improve the quality of care for some or many patients. However, 60.0% of psychiatrists do not recommend technology-based treatments to patients, and those who recommend select a variety of treatments. Psychiatrists use technology more frequently when the patients live in urban rather than rural or suburban areas. Only 23.9% of psychiatrists have any formal training in technology. CONCLUSIONS: Digital technology is routinely used by psychiatrists in clinical practice. There is near unanimous agreement about the benefits of psychiatrist online information-seeking, but research on information overload is needed. There is less agreement about the appropriate use of other clinical technologies, especially those involving patients. It is too early to tell if technology-based treatments or patient Internet activities will improve the quality of care. The digital divide remains between use of technology for psychiatrists with patients living in urban and rural or suburban areas. Psychiatrists need more formal training in technology to understand risks, benefits and limitations of clinical products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7532734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75327342020-10-05 Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice Bauer, Rita Glenn, Tasha Monteith, Scott Whybrow, Peter C. Bauer, Michael Int J Bipolar Disord Research BACKGROUND: Psychiatrists were surveyed to obtain an overview of how they currently use technology in clinical practice, with a focus on psychiatrists who treat patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Data were obtained using an online-only survey containing 46 questions, completed by a convenience sample of 209 psychiatrists in 19 countries. Descriptive statistics, and analyses of linear associations and to remove country heterogeneity were calculated. RESULTS: Virtually all psychiatrists seek information online with many benefits, but some experience information overload. 75.2% of psychiatrists use an EMR/EHR at work, and 64.6% communicate with patients using a new technology, primarily email (48.8%). 66.0% do not ask patients if they use the Internet in relation to bipolar disorder. 67.3% of psychiatrists feel it is too early to tell if patient online information seeking about bipolar disorder is improving the quality of care. 66.3% of psychiatrists think technology-based treatments will improve the quality of care for some or many patients. However, 60.0% of psychiatrists do not recommend technology-based treatments to patients, and those who recommend select a variety of treatments. Psychiatrists use technology more frequently when the patients live in urban rather than rural or suburban areas. Only 23.9% of psychiatrists have any formal training in technology. CONCLUSIONS: Digital technology is routinely used by psychiatrists in clinical practice. There is near unanimous agreement about the benefits of psychiatrist online information-seeking, but research on information overload is needed. There is less agreement about the appropriate use of other clinical technologies, especially those involving patients. It is too early to tell if technology-based treatments or patient Internet activities will improve the quality of care. The digital divide remains between use of technology for psychiatrists with patients living in urban and rural or suburban areas. Psychiatrists need more formal training in technology to understand risks, benefits and limitations of clinical products. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7532734/ /pubmed/33009954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-00194-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Bauer, Rita Glenn, Tasha Monteith, Scott Whybrow, Peter C. Bauer, Michael Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice |
title | Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice |
title_full | Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice |
title_short | Survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice |
title_sort | survey of psychiatrist use of digital technology in clinical practice |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33009954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-00194-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bauerrita surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice AT glenntasha surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice AT monteithscott surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice AT whybrowpeterc surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice AT bauermichael surveyofpsychiatristuseofdigitaltechnologyinclinicalpractice |