Cargando…
Lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection
The aim of this study was to explore the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to verify its utility in the prediction of lung disease’s severity and outcome. Fifty-three consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department of Santa Maria delle Grazie Hosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33011929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02512-y |
_version_ | 1783590028428967936 |
---|---|
author | Bosso, Giorgio Allegorico, Enrico Pagano, Antonio Porta, Giovanni Serra, Claudia Minerva, Valentina Mercurio, Valentina Russo, Teresa Altruda, Concetta Arbo, Paola De Sio, Chiara Dello Vicario, Ferdinando Numis, Fabio Giuliano |
author_facet | Bosso, Giorgio Allegorico, Enrico Pagano, Antonio Porta, Giovanni Serra, Claudia Minerva, Valentina Mercurio, Valentina Russo, Teresa Altruda, Concetta Arbo, Paola De Sio, Chiara Dello Vicario, Ferdinando Numis, Fabio Giuliano |
author_sort | Bosso, Giorgio |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to explore the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to verify its utility in the prediction of lung disease’s severity and outcome. Fifty-three consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department of Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital with high suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 on samples obtained from nasopharyngeal swab as well as complete proper diagnostic work-up that included clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, blood gas analyses, chest CT and LUS. A semiquantitative analysis of B-lines distribution was performed to calculate the LUS score. Patients were divided into two groups according to the results of both SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test and other exams (Group A = pneumonia due to SARS-CoV2 infection vs Group B = no SARS-CoV2 infection and another definite diagnosis). LUS showed an excellent accuracy in predicting the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (area under the ROC curve of 0.92 with a sensibility of 73% and a specificity of 89% a the cut-off of 12.5). LUS score was more impaired in SARS-CoV-2 patients (18.1 ± 6.0 vs 7.6 ± 5.9, p < 0.00001) and it is significantly negatively correlated with PF ratio values (r = − 0.719, p < 0.0001). An intrahospital mortality rate of 46% was found; patients with adverse outcome had significant higher value of LUS, PF, LDH, and APACHE II score. None of these parameters was predictive of mortality. LUS is a useful tool for the early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection and for the evaluation of the disease severity, but does not predict mortality. Further studies with repeated evaluations of LUS score are needed to further explore the role of LUS in the assessment of severity in SARS-CoV-2 disease and in the monitoring of the response to treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7532928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75329282020-10-05 Lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection Bosso, Giorgio Allegorico, Enrico Pagano, Antonio Porta, Giovanni Serra, Claudia Minerva, Valentina Mercurio, Valentina Russo, Teresa Altruda, Concetta Arbo, Paola De Sio, Chiara Dello Vicario, Ferdinando Numis, Fabio Giuliano Intern Emerg Med EM - Original The aim of this study was to explore the role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to verify its utility in the prediction of lung disease’s severity and outcome. Fifty-three consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department of Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital with high suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 on samples obtained from nasopharyngeal swab as well as complete proper diagnostic work-up that included clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, blood gas analyses, chest CT and LUS. A semiquantitative analysis of B-lines distribution was performed to calculate the LUS score. Patients were divided into two groups according to the results of both SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test and other exams (Group A = pneumonia due to SARS-CoV2 infection vs Group B = no SARS-CoV2 infection and another definite diagnosis). LUS showed an excellent accuracy in predicting the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (area under the ROC curve of 0.92 with a sensibility of 73% and a specificity of 89% a the cut-off of 12.5). LUS score was more impaired in SARS-CoV-2 patients (18.1 ± 6.0 vs 7.6 ± 5.9, p < 0.00001) and it is significantly negatively correlated with PF ratio values (r = − 0.719, p < 0.0001). An intrahospital mortality rate of 46% was found; patients with adverse outcome had significant higher value of LUS, PF, LDH, and APACHE II score. None of these parameters was predictive of mortality. LUS is a useful tool for the early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection and for the evaluation of the disease severity, but does not predict mortality. Further studies with repeated evaluations of LUS score are needed to further explore the role of LUS in the assessment of severity in SARS-CoV-2 disease and in the monitoring of the response to treatments. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7532928/ /pubmed/33011929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02512-y Text en © Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI) 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | EM - Original Bosso, Giorgio Allegorico, Enrico Pagano, Antonio Porta, Giovanni Serra, Claudia Minerva, Valentina Mercurio, Valentina Russo, Teresa Altruda, Concetta Arbo, Paola De Sio, Chiara Dello Vicario, Ferdinando Numis, Fabio Giuliano Lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title | Lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_full | Lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_fullStr | Lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_short | Lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_sort | lung ultrasound as diagnostic tool for sars-cov-2 infection |
topic | EM - Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7532928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33011929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02512-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bossogiorgio lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT allegoricoenrico lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT paganoantonio lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT portagiovanni lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT serraclaudia lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT minervavalentina lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT mercuriovalentina lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT russoteresa lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT altrudaconcetta lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT arbopaola lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT desiochiara lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT dellovicarioferdinando lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection AT numisfabiogiuliano lungultrasoundasdiagnostictoolforsarscov2infection |