Cargando…

The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: To explore the effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes (PreHab) on postoperative physical and psychological outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHOD: A systematic search was conducted from inception to November 2019. Randomised controlle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter, Hayley M., Littlewood, Chris, Webster, Kate E., Smith, Benjamin E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33010802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03676-6
_version_ 1783590050465841152
author Carter, Hayley M.
Littlewood, Chris
Webster, Kate E.
Smith, Benjamin E.
author_facet Carter, Hayley M.
Littlewood, Chris
Webster, Kate E.
Smith, Benjamin E.
author_sort Carter, Hayley M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To explore the effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes (PreHab) on postoperative physical and psychological outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHOD: A systematic search was conducted from inception to November 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. RESULTS: The search identified 739 potentially eligible studies, three met the inclusion criteria. All included RCTs scored ‘high’ risk of bias. PreHab in all three RCTs was an exercise programme, each varied in content (strength, control, balance and perturbation training), frequency (10 to 24 sessions) and length (3.1- to 6-weeks). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were reported for quadriceps strength (one RCT) and single leg hop scores (two RCTs) in favour of PreHab three months after ACLR, compared to no PreHab. One RCT reported no statistically significant between-group difference for pain and function. No RCT evaluated post-operative psychological outcomes. CONCLUSION: Very low quality evidence suggests that PreHab that includes muscular strength, balance and perturbation training offers a small benefit to quadriceps strength and single leg hop scores three months after ACLR compared with no PreHab. There is no consensus on the optimum PreHab programme content, frequency and length. Further research is needed to develop PreHab programmes that consider psychosocial factors and the measurement of relevant post-operative outcomes such as psychological readiness and return to sport. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO trial registration number. CRD42020162754.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7533034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75330342020-10-05 The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review Carter, Hayley M. Littlewood, Chris Webster, Kate E. Smith, Benjamin E. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: To explore the effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes (PreHab) on postoperative physical and psychological outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHOD: A systematic search was conducted from inception to November 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. RESULTS: The search identified 739 potentially eligible studies, three met the inclusion criteria. All included RCTs scored ‘high’ risk of bias. PreHab in all three RCTs was an exercise programme, each varied in content (strength, control, balance and perturbation training), frequency (10 to 24 sessions) and length (3.1- to 6-weeks). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were reported for quadriceps strength (one RCT) and single leg hop scores (two RCTs) in favour of PreHab three months after ACLR, compared to no PreHab. One RCT reported no statistically significant between-group difference for pain and function. No RCT evaluated post-operative psychological outcomes. CONCLUSION: Very low quality evidence suggests that PreHab that includes muscular strength, balance and perturbation training offers a small benefit to quadriceps strength and single leg hop scores three months after ACLR compared with no PreHab. There is no consensus on the optimum PreHab programme content, frequency and length. Further research is needed to develop PreHab programmes that consider psychosocial factors and the measurement of relevant post-operative outcomes such as psychological readiness and return to sport. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO trial registration number. CRD42020162754. BioMed Central 2020-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7533034/ /pubmed/33010802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03676-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carter, Hayley M.
Littlewood, Chris
Webster, Kate E.
Smith, Benjamin E.
The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review
title The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review
title_full The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review
title_fullStr The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review
title_short The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (acl) reconstruction: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33010802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03676-6
work_keys_str_mv AT carterhayleym theeffectivenessofpreoperativerehabilitationprogrammesonpostoperativeoutcomesfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentaclreconstructionasystematicreview
AT littlewoodchris theeffectivenessofpreoperativerehabilitationprogrammesonpostoperativeoutcomesfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentaclreconstructionasystematicreview
AT websterkatee theeffectivenessofpreoperativerehabilitationprogrammesonpostoperativeoutcomesfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentaclreconstructionasystematicreview
AT smithbenjamine theeffectivenessofpreoperativerehabilitationprogrammesonpostoperativeoutcomesfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentaclreconstructionasystematicreview
AT carterhayleym effectivenessofpreoperativerehabilitationprogrammesonpostoperativeoutcomesfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentaclreconstructionasystematicreview
AT littlewoodchris effectivenessofpreoperativerehabilitationprogrammesonpostoperativeoutcomesfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentaclreconstructionasystematicreview
AT websterkatee effectivenessofpreoperativerehabilitationprogrammesonpostoperativeoutcomesfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentaclreconstructionasystematicreview
AT smithbenjamine effectivenessofpreoperativerehabilitationprogrammesonpostoperativeoutcomesfollowinganteriorcruciateligamentaclreconstructionasystematicreview