Cargando…

Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Renal Biopsy: What is the “core” of the Problem? A Retrospective Case–control Study

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) plays a critical role in the work-up of renal parenchymal disease. Although it is considered a low-risk procedure, additional interventions may be required in about 7% of the cases following biopsy. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nance, Michael E., Tarim, Andrew O., Nguyen, Van, Malhotra, Kunal, Davis, Ryan M., Bhat, Ambarish P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024609
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_87_2020
_version_ 1783590063737667584
author Nance, Michael E.
Tarim, Andrew O.
Nguyen, Van
Malhotra, Kunal
Davis, Ryan M.
Bhat, Ambarish P.
author_facet Nance, Michael E.
Tarim, Andrew O.
Nguyen, Van
Malhotra, Kunal
Davis, Ryan M.
Bhat, Ambarish P.
author_sort Nance, Michael E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) plays a critical role in the work-up of renal parenchymal disease. Although it is considered a low-risk procedure, additional interventions may be required in about 7% of the cases following biopsy. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for major hemorrhage by microscopic analysis of the cores obtained following PRB, with an intent to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of the risk stratification process, especially in patients undergoing this procedure in an outpatient setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review identified 17 of 179 patients (9.50%) with major hemorrhage following PRB between July 2014 and June 2019. Using propensity score matching, 26 controls (without major hemorrhage) were matched to 17 cases (with major hemorrhage). The biopsy cores obtained from the cases and controls were analyzed by a single pathologist for medullary, cortical, total (medullary + cortical) lengths, and the number of arcuate arteries (AAs). Medullary:cortical (M:C), cortical:total (C:T), and medullary:total (M:T) length ratios were then calculated. RESULTS: A stratified version of logistic regression was used to test for an association between each of the variables identified on the cores and the probability of a major hemorrhage. The analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant association between the number of AAs per specimen with the risk of major hemorrhage (P = 0.0006). When 0, 1, or >2 AAs were identified, the frequency of major hemorrhage was 13.04%, 66.67%, and 75.00%, respectively. The odds of major hemorrhage were 6 times higher with one AA and (95% CI, 1.28–32.30) and 15 times higher with >2 AAs (95% CI, 1.41–169.57). No significant association was found between medullary length (P = 0.228), medulla:cortex (M:C) (P = 0.089), medulla:total (M:T) (P = 0.108), or cortex:total (C:T) (P = 0.112) length ratios and major hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: There was a strong and incremental correlation between major renal hemorrhage following PRB and the number of AAs per core specimen. Identification of AAs by the pathologist, while assessing for sample adequacy, in the US suite can help predict major hemorrhage in patients undergoing PRBs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7533095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75330952020-10-05 Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Renal Biopsy: What is the “core” of the Problem? A Retrospective Case–control Study Nance, Michael E. Tarim, Andrew O. Nguyen, Van Malhotra, Kunal Davis, Ryan M. Bhat, Ambarish P. J Clin Imaging Sci Original Research OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) plays a critical role in the work-up of renal parenchymal disease. Although it is considered a low-risk procedure, additional interventions may be required in about 7% of the cases following biopsy. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for major hemorrhage by microscopic analysis of the cores obtained following PRB, with an intent to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of the risk stratification process, especially in patients undergoing this procedure in an outpatient setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review identified 17 of 179 patients (9.50%) with major hemorrhage following PRB between July 2014 and June 2019. Using propensity score matching, 26 controls (without major hemorrhage) were matched to 17 cases (with major hemorrhage). The biopsy cores obtained from the cases and controls were analyzed by a single pathologist for medullary, cortical, total (medullary + cortical) lengths, and the number of arcuate arteries (AAs). Medullary:cortical (M:C), cortical:total (C:T), and medullary:total (M:T) length ratios were then calculated. RESULTS: A stratified version of logistic regression was used to test for an association between each of the variables identified on the cores and the probability of a major hemorrhage. The analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant association between the number of AAs per specimen with the risk of major hemorrhage (P = 0.0006). When 0, 1, or >2 AAs were identified, the frequency of major hemorrhage was 13.04%, 66.67%, and 75.00%, respectively. The odds of major hemorrhage were 6 times higher with one AA and (95% CI, 1.28–32.30) and 15 times higher with >2 AAs (95% CI, 1.41–169.57). No significant association was found between medullary length (P = 0.228), medulla:cortex (M:C) (P = 0.089), medulla:total (M:T) (P = 0.108), or cortex:total (C:T) (P = 0.112) length ratios and major hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: There was a strong and incremental correlation between major renal hemorrhage following PRB and the number of AAs per core specimen. Identification of AAs by the pathologist, while assessing for sample adequacy, in the US suite can help predict major hemorrhage in patients undergoing PRBs. Scientific Scholar 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7533095/ /pubmed/33024609 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_87_2020 Text en © 2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nance, Michael E.
Tarim, Andrew O.
Nguyen, Van
Malhotra, Kunal
Davis, Ryan M.
Bhat, Ambarish P.
Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Renal Biopsy: What is the “core” of the Problem? A Retrospective Case–control Study
title Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Renal Biopsy: What is the “core” of the Problem? A Retrospective Case–control Study
title_full Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Renal Biopsy: What is the “core” of the Problem? A Retrospective Case–control Study
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Renal Biopsy: What is the “core” of the Problem? A Retrospective Case–control Study
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Renal Biopsy: What is the “core” of the Problem? A Retrospective Case–control Study
title_short Risk Factors for Major Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Renal Biopsy: What is the “core” of the Problem? A Retrospective Case–control Study
title_sort risk factors for major hemorrhage following percutaneous image-guided renal biopsy: what is the “core” of the problem? a retrospective case–control study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33024609
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_87_2020
work_keys_str_mv AT nancemichaele riskfactorsformajorhemorrhagefollowingpercutaneousimageguidedrenalbiopsywhatisthecoreoftheproblemaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT tarimandrewo riskfactorsformajorhemorrhagefollowingpercutaneousimageguidedrenalbiopsywhatisthecoreoftheproblemaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT nguyenvan riskfactorsformajorhemorrhagefollowingpercutaneousimageguidedrenalbiopsywhatisthecoreoftheproblemaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT malhotrakunal riskfactorsformajorhemorrhagefollowingpercutaneousimageguidedrenalbiopsywhatisthecoreoftheproblemaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT davisryanm riskfactorsformajorhemorrhagefollowingpercutaneousimageguidedrenalbiopsywhatisthecoreoftheproblemaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT bhatambarishp riskfactorsformajorhemorrhagefollowingpercutaneousimageguidedrenalbiopsywhatisthecoreoftheproblemaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy