Cargando…

Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric variations in patients of head and neck cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy using optimized non-coplanar (ncVMAT) beams with coplanar (cVMAT) beams using volumetric arc therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients of head and neck cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gayen, Sanjib, Kombathula, Sri Harsha, Manna, Sumanta, Varshney, Sonal, Pareek, Puneet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33012157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00143
_version_ 1783590126402666496
author Gayen, Sanjib
Kombathula, Sri Harsha
Manna, Sumanta
Varshney, Sonal
Pareek, Puneet
author_facet Gayen, Sanjib
Kombathula, Sri Harsha
Manna, Sumanta
Varshney, Sonal
Pareek, Puneet
author_sort Gayen, Sanjib
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric variations in patients of head and neck cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy using optimized non-coplanar (ncVMAT) beams with coplanar (cVMAT) beams using volumetric arc therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients of head and neck cancer that had received radiotherapy using VMAT in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Each of the patients was planned using coplanar and non-coplanar orientations using an optimized couch angle and fluences. We analyzed the Conformity Index (CI(RTOG)), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Heterogeneity Index (HI(RTOG)), low dose volume, target and organs-at-risk coverage in both the plans without changing planning optimization parameters. RESULTS: The prescription dose ranged from 60 Gy to 70 Gy. Using ncVMAT, CI(RTOG), DHI and HI(RTOG), and tumor coverage (ID(95%)) had improved, low dose spillage volume in the body V(5Gy) was increased and V(10Gy) was reduced. Integral dose and intensity-modulated radiation therapy factor had increased in ncVMAT. In the case of non-coplanar beam arrangements, maximum dose (D(max)) of right and left humeral head were reduced significantly whereas apex of the right and left lung mean dose were increased. CONCLUSION: The use of ncVMAT produced better target coverage and sparing of the shoulder and soft tissue of the neck as well as the critical organ compared with the cVMAT in patients of head and neck malignancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7533406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75334062020-10-14 Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy Gayen, Sanjib Kombathula, Sri Harsha Manna, Sumanta Varshney, Sonal Pareek, Puneet Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric variations in patients of head and neck cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy using optimized non-coplanar (ncVMAT) beams with coplanar (cVMAT) beams using volumetric arc therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients of head and neck cancer that had received radiotherapy using VMAT in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Each of the patients was planned using coplanar and non-coplanar orientations using an optimized couch angle and fluences. We analyzed the Conformity Index (CI(RTOG)), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Heterogeneity Index (HI(RTOG)), low dose volume, target and organs-at-risk coverage in both the plans without changing planning optimization parameters. RESULTS: The prescription dose ranged from 60 Gy to 70 Gy. Using ncVMAT, CI(RTOG), DHI and HI(RTOG), and tumor coverage (ID(95%)) had improved, low dose spillage volume in the body V(5Gy) was increased and V(10Gy) was reduced. Integral dose and intensity-modulated radiation therapy factor had increased in ncVMAT. In the case of non-coplanar beam arrangements, maximum dose (D(max)) of right and left humeral head were reduced significantly whereas apex of the right and left lung mean dose were increased. CONCLUSION: The use of ncVMAT produced better target coverage and sparing of the shoulder and soft tissue of the neck as well as the critical organ compared with the cVMAT in patients of head and neck malignancy. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2020-06 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7533406/ /pubmed/33012157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00143 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gayen, Sanjib
Kombathula, Sri Harsha
Manna, Sumanta
Varshney, Sonal
Pareek, Puneet
Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
title Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
title_full Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
title_fullStr Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
title_short Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
title_sort dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33012157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00143
work_keys_str_mv AT gayensanjib dosimetriccomparisonofcoplanarandnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyinheadandneckcancertreatedwithradiotherapy
AT kombathulasriharsha dosimetriccomparisonofcoplanarandnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyinheadandneckcancertreatedwithradiotherapy
AT mannasumanta dosimetriccomparisonofcoplanarandnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyinheadandneckcancertreatedwithradiotherapy
AT varshneysonal dosimetriccomparisonofcoplanarandnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyinheadandneckcancertreatedwithradiotherapy
AT pareekpuneet dosimetriccomparisonofcoplanarandnoncoplanarvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyinheadandneckcancertreatedwithradiotherapy