Cargando…

Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance

Self-assessments of performance are commonly used in the human workplace, although compared to peer or supervisor ratings, they may be subject to positive biases or leniency. The use of subjective ratings scales in animal sciences is also common, although little consideration is usually given to pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Corinna C. A., Sibbald, Nicola J., Rooney, Nicola J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00612
_version_ 1783590173167058944
author Clark, Corinna C. A.
Sibbald, Nicola J.
Rooney, Nicola J.
author_facet Clark, Corinna C. A.
Sibbald, Nicola J.
Rooney, Nicola J.
author_sort Clark, Corinna C. A.
collection PubMed
description Self-assessments of performance are commonly used in the human workplace, although compared to peer or supervisor ratings, they may be subject to positive biases or leniency. The use of subjective ratings scales in animal sciences is also common, although little consideration is usually given to possible rater bias. Dog handlers, work very closely and form strong relationships with their dogs and are also best placed to monitor dog performance since they often work in isolation. Previous work found ratings of search dog performance correlated well between experienced dog trainers, instructors, and scientists; but until now, there has been no investigation into ratings made by a dog's own handler. We compared handlers' subjective assessment of their own dog's search performance to scores given by other handlers and in a second study, to scores made by impartial raters. We found that handlers generally showed leniency; for example scoring their own dogs more favorably for Control (responsiveness to commands) and Strength of Indication. But the degree of bias varied with the trait being scored and between raters. Such differences may be attributable to greater desirability or importance of favorable scores for certain traits, or a lack of clarity of their precise meaning. Handlers may vary in susceptibility to bias due to differing levels of experience and the extent to which they view their dog's ability as dependent on their own. The exact causes require further investigation. We suggest working dog agencies provide rater-training to overcome leniency, improve reliability and validity, and to increase handler's motivation to provide accurate assessments. This study represents one of a series of steps to formulate robust, validated and evidence-based performance rating systems and has relevance to any situation where raters assess their own performance or others (particularly where they may have a vested interest in, or loyalty toward, the ratee).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7533607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75336072020-11-12 Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance Clark, Corinna C. A. Sibbald, Nicola J. Rooney, Nicola J. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Self-assessments of performance are commonly used in the human workplace, although compared to peer or supervisor ratings, they may be subject to positive biases or leniency. The use of subjective ratings scales in animal sciences is also common, although little consideration is usually given to possible rater bias. Dog handlers, work very closely and form strong relationships with their dogs and are also best placed to monitor dog performance since they often work in isolation. Previous work found ratings of search dog performance correlated well between experienced dog trainers, instructors, and scientists; but until now, there has been no investigation into ratings made by a dog's own handler. We compared handlers' subjective assessment of their own dog's search performance to scores given by other handlers and in a second study, to scores made by impartial raters. We found that handlers generally showed leniency; for example scoring their own dogs more favorably for Control (responsiveness to commands) and Strength of Indication. But the degree of bias varied with the trait being scored and between raters. Such differences may be attributable to greater desirability or importance of favorable scores for certain traits, or a lack of clarity of their precise meaning. Handlers may vary in susceptibility to bias due to differing levels of experience and the extent to which they view their dog's ability as dependent on their own. The exact causes require further investigation. We suggest working dog agencies provide rater-training to overcome leniency, improve reliability and validity, and to increase handler's motivation to provide accurate assessments. This study represents one of a series of steps to formulate robust, validated and evidence-based performance rating systems and has relevance to any situation where raters assess their own performance or others (particularly where they may have a vested interest in, or loyalty toward, the ratee). Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7533607/ /pubmed/33195498 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00612 Text en Copyright © 2020 Clark, Sibbald and Rooney. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Clark, Corinna C. A.
Sibbald, Nicola J.
Rooney, Nicola J.
Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance
title Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance
title_full Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance
title_fullStr Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance
title_full_unstemmed Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance
title_short Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance
title_sort search dog handlers show positive bias when scoring their own dog's performance
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195498
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00612
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkcorinnaca searchdoghandlersshowpositivebiaswhenscoringtheirowndogsperformance
AT sibbaldnicolaj searchdoghandlersshowpositivebiaswhenscoringtheirowndogsperformance
AT rooneynicolaj searchdoghandlersshowpositivebiaswhenscoringtheirowndogsperformance