Cargando…
Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation
BACKGROUND: The risk of contracting rabies is low for travellers. However, the number of Dutch travellers potentially exposed abroad following an animal-associated injury and needing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has increased, resulting in increased costs. AIM: Here, we evaluated the costs and th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32975187 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.38.1900716 |
_version_ | 1783590175951028224 |
---|---|
author | Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM Mangen, Marie-Josee J Haverkate, Manon R Luppino, Floriana S Bantjes, Sabine E Visser, Leo G Swaan, Corien M Ruijs, Wilhelmina LM Over, Eelco AB |
author_facet | Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM Mangen, Marie-Josee J Haverkate, Manon R Luppino, Floriana S Bantjes, Sabine E Visser, Leo G Swaan, Corien M Ruijs, Wilhelmina LM Over, Eelco AB |
author_sort | Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The risk of contracting rabies is low for travellers. However, the number of Dutch travellers potentially exposed abroad following an animal-associated injury and needing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has increased, resulting in increased costs. AIM: Here, we evaluated the costs and the cost-effectiveness of different pre- and post-exposure interventions in the Netherlands, taking into account the 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for the prevention of rabies. METHODS: A decision tree-based economic model was constructed. We calculated and compared the cost of different WHO pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommendations, intramuscular vs intradermal vaccination and PEP subsequent to increased vaccination coverage in risk groups. We estimated cost-effectiveness, expressed as incremental costs per rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) administration averted, using a societal perspective. Statistical uncertainty regarding number of travellers and vaccination coverage was assessed. RESULTS: Total costs at the national level were highest using previous WHO recommendations from 2012, estimated at EUR 15.4 million annually. Intradermal vaccinations in combination with the current recommendations led to the lowest costs, estimated at EUR 10.3 million. Higher vaccination uptake resulted in higher overall costs. The incremental costs per RIG administration averted varied from EUR 21,300-46,800. CONCLUSIONS: The change in rabies PrEP and PEP recommendations in 2018 reduced total costs. Strategies with increased pre-travel vaccination uptake led to fewer RIG administrations and fewer vaccinations after exposure but also to higher total costs. Although larger scale intradermal administration of rabies vaccine can reduce total costs of PrEP and can positively influence vaccination uptake, it remains a costly intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7533619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75336192020-10-16 Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM Mangen, Marie-Josee J Haverkate, Manon R Luppino, Floriana S Bantjes, Sabine E Visser, Leo G Swaan, Corien M Ruijs, Wilhelmina LM Over, Eelco AB Euro Surveill Research BACKGROUND: The risk of contracting rabies is low for travellers. However, the number of Dutch travellers potentially exposed abroad following an animal-associated injury and needing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has increased, resulting in increased costs. AIM: Here, we evaluated the costs and the cost-effectiveness of different pre- and post-exposure interventions in the Netherlands, taking into account the 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for the prevention of rabies. METHODS: A decision tree-based economic model was constructed. We calculated and compared the cost of different WHO pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommendations, intramuscular vs intradermal vaccination and PEP subsequent to increased vaccination coverage in risk groups. We estimated cost-effectiveness, expressed as incremental costs per rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) administration averted, using a societal perspective. Statistical uncertainty regarding number of travellers and vaccination coverage was assessed. RESULTS: Total costs at the national level were highest using previous WHO recommendations from 2012, estimated at EUR 15.4 million annually. Intradermal vaccinations in combination with the current recommendations led to the lowest costs, estimated at EUR 10.3 million. Higher vaccination uptake resulted in higher overall costs. The incremental costs per RIG administration averted varied from EUR 21,300-46,800. CONCLUSIONS: The change in rabies PrEP and PEP recommendations in 2018 reduced total costs. Strategies with increased pre-travel vaccination uptake led to fewer RIG administrations and fewer vaccinations after exposure but also to higher total costs. Although larger scale intradermal administration of rabies vaccine can reduce total costs of PrEP and can positively influence vaccination uptake, it remains a costly intervention. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7533619/ /pubmed/32975187 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.38.1900716 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM Mangen, Marie-Josee J Haverkate, Manon R Luppino, Floriana S Bantjes, Sabine E Visser, Leo G Swaan, Corien M Ruijs, Wilhelmina LM Over, Eelco AB Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation |
title | Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation |
title_full | Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation |
title_fullStr | Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation |
title_short | Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation |
title_sort | rabies vaccination strategies in the netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32975187 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.38.1900716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suijkerbuijkanitawm rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation AT mangenmariejoseej rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation AT haverkatemanonr rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation AT luppinoflorianas rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation AT bantjessabinee rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation AT visserleog rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation AT swaancorienm rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation AT ruijswilhelminalm rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation AT overeelcoab rabiesvaccinationstrategiesinthenetherlandsin2018acostevaluation |