Cargando…

State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy

Within the last decade, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) systems with non‐transvenous leads were developed in order to minimize complications related to the cardiovascular position of transvenous ICD leads. This national expert consensus gives an overview of potential indications for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schukro, Christoph, Santer, David, Prenner, Günther, Stühlinger, Markus, Martinek, Martin, Teubl, Alexander, Moertl, Deddo, Schwarz, Stefan, Nürnberg, Michael, Fiedler, Lukas, Hatala, Robert, Khazen, Cesar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32794309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23432
Descripción
Sumario:Within the last decade, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) systems with non‐transvenous leads were developed in order to minimize complications related to the cardiovascular position of transvenous ICD leads. This national expert consensus gives an overview of potential indications for the implantation of non‐transvenous ICD systems, and provides specific recommendations for implantation, follow‐up, and complication management in patients with subcutaneous ICD. Regarding particular issues like the necessity for shock efficacy testing, or the clinical outcome as compared to transvenous ICD, randomized data are expected in the near future.