Cargando…

State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy

Within the last decade, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) systems with non‐transvenous leads were developed in order to minimize complications related to the cardiovascular position of transvenous ICD leads. This national expert consensus gives an overview of potential indications for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schukro, Christoph, Santer, David, Prenner, Günther, Stühlinger, Markus, Martinek, Martin, Teubl, Alexander, Moertl, Deddo, Schwarz, Stefan, Nürnberg, Michael, Fiedler, Lukas, Hatala, Robert, Khazen, Cesar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32794309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23432
_version_ 1783590231549673472
author Schukro, Christoph
Santer, David
Prenner, Günther
Stühlinger, Markus
Martinek, Martin
Teubl, Alexander
Moertl, Deddo
Schwarz, Stefan
Nürnberg, Michael
Fiedler, Lukas
Hatala, Robert
Khazen, Cesar
author_facet Schukro, Christoph
Santer, David
Prenner, Günther
Stühlinger, Markus
Martinek, Martin
Teubl, Alexander
Moertl, Deddo
Schwarz, Stefan
Nürnberg, Michael
Fiedler, Lukas
Hatala, Robert
Khazen, Cesar
author_sort Schukro, Christoph
collection PubMed
description Within the last decade, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) systems with non‐transvenous leads were developed in order to minimize complications related to the cardiovascular position of transvenous ICD leads. This national expert consensus gives an overview of potential indications for the implantation of non‐transvenous ICD systems, and provides specific recommendations for implantation, follow‐up, and complication management in patients with subcutaneous ICD. Regarding particular issues like the necessity for shock efficacy testing, or the clinical outcome as compared to transvenous ICD, randomized data are expected in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7533987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75339872020-10-07 State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy Schukro, Christoph Santer, David Prenner, Günther Stühlinger, Markus Martinek, Martin Teubl, Alexander Moertl, Deddo Schwarz, Stefan Nürnberg, Michael Fiedler, Lukas Hatala, Robert Khazen, Cesar Clin Cardiol Reviews Within the last decade, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) systems with non‐transvenous leads were developed in order to minimize complications related to the cardiovascular position of transvenous ICD leads. This national expert consensus gives an overview of potential indications for the implantation of non‐transvenous ICD systems, and provides specific recommendations for implantation, follow‐up, and complication management in patients with subcutaneous ICD. Regarding particular issues like the necessity for shock efficacy testing, or the clinical outcome as compared to transvenous ICD, randomized data are expected in the near future. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7533987/ /pubmed/32794309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23432 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Schukro, Christoph
Santer, David
Prenner, Günther
Stühlinger, Markus
Martinek, Martin
Teubl, Alexander
Moertl, Deddo
Schwarz, Stefan
Nürnberg, Michael
Fiedler, Lukas
Hatala, Robert
Khazen, Cesar
State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy
title State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy
title_full State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy
title_fullStr State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy
title_full_unstemmed State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy
title_short State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy
title_sort state‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7533987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32794309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23432
work_keys_str_mv AT schukrochristoph stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT santerdavid stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT prennergunther stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT stuhlingermarkus stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT martinekmartin stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT teublalexander stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT moertldeddo stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT schwarzstefan stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT nurnbergmichael stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT fiedlerlukas stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT hatalarobert stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy
AT khazencesar stateoftheartconsensusonnontransvenousimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatortherapy