Cargando…
Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients
BACKGROUND: High failure rates have been documented after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients, and revision surgery is indicated due to high activity levels of children and adolescents. PURPOSE: To define trends in revision ACLR in patients who underwent initial AC...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120953337 |
_version_ | 1783590250383147008 |
---|---|
author | Rugg, Caitlin M. Pitcher, Austin A. Allen, Christina Pandya, Nirav K. |
author_facet | Rugg, Caitlin M. Pitcher, Austin A. Allen, Christina Pandya, Nirav K. |
author_sort | Rugg, Caitlin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High failure rates have been documented after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients, and revision surgery is indicated due to high activity levels of children and adolescents. PURPOSE: To define trends in revision ACLR in patients who underwent initial ACLR at younger than 18 years. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: An electronic medical record was used to retrospectively identify revision ACLR procedures performed by 2 surgeons between the years 2010 and 2016 in patients younger than 18 years at initial reconstruction. Descriptive information, intraoperative findings, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation data were recorded from initial and revision surgeries. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (17 girls, 15 boys) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 15.8 years at initial reconstruction. For initial reconstructions, 15 patients underwent transphyseal procedures, 3 patients underwent adult-type procedures using an anatomic reconstruction technique that did not take into account the physis, and 2 patients underwent partial intraepiphyseal procedures. Graft types included hamstring autograft (n = 17), allograft (n = 5), hybrid (n = 4), and bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB; n = 3). Average primary reconstruction graft diameter was 8.0 mm (girls, 7.72 mm; boys, 8.36 mm; P = .045). After initial reconstruction, 10 patients had postoperative protocol noncompliance, and 8 patients reported delayed recovery. Mean time to retear was 565 days (range, 25-1539 days). At revision, BTB autograft was used in 50% (n = 16), followed by hamstring autograph (31.3%; n = 10) and allograft (12.5%; n = 4); mean graft diameter was 9.05 mm. Chondral surgery was more common during revision (25% for revision vs 0% for index; P = .031). There were 4 patients who required staged reconstruction with bone grafting. At mean final follow-up of 29.5 months (SD, 22.2 months), there were 3 graft failures (9.4%) and 5 contralateral ACL ruptures (15.6%). CONCLUSION: Most patients with ACL graft failure were adequately treated with a single revision. Conversion from a soft tissue graft to a BTB autograft was the most common procedure. Infrequently, patients required staged reconstructions. Providers should have a high index of suspicion for associated intra-articular injuries resulting from graft failure in adolescent patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7534089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75340892020-10-14 Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients Rugg, Caitlin M. Pitcher, Austin A. Allen, Christina Pandya, Nirav K. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: High failure rates have been documented after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients, and revision surgery is indicated due to high activity levels of children and adolescents. PURPOSE: To define trends in revision ACLR in patients who underwent initial ACLR at younger than 18 years. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: An electronic medical record was used to retrospectively identify revision ACLR procedures performed by 2 surgeons between the years 2010 and 2016 in patients younger than 18 years at initial reconstruction. Descriptive information, intraoperative findings, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation data were recorded from initial and revision surgeries. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (17 girls, 15 boys) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 15.8 years at initial reconstruction. For initial reconstructions, 15 patients underwent transphyseal procedures, 3 patients underwent adult-type procedures using an anatomic reconstruction technique that did not take into account the physis, and 2 patients underwent partial intraepiphyseal procedures. Graft types included hamstring autograft (n = 17), allograft (n = 5), hybrid (n = 4), and bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB; n = 3). Average primary reconstruction graft diameter was 8.0 mm (girls, 7.72 mm; boys, 8.36 mm; P = .045). After initial reconstruction, 10 patients had postoperative protocol noncompliance, and 8 patients reported delayed recovery. Mean time to retear was 565 days (range, 25-1539 days). At revision, BTB autograft was used in 50% (n = 16), followed by hamstring autograph (31.3%; n = 10) and allograft (12.5%; n = 4); mean graft diameter was 9.05 mm. Chondral surgery was more common during revision (25% for revision vs 0% for index; P = .031). There were 4 patients who required staged reconstruction with bone grafting. At mean final follow-up of 29.5 months (SD, 22.2 months), there were 3 graft failures (9.4%) and 5 contralateral ACL ruptures (15.6%). CONCLUSION: Most patients with ACL graft failure were adequately treated with a single revision. Conversion from a soft tissue graft to a BTB autograft was the most common procedure. Infrequently, patients required staged reconstructions. Providers should have a high index of suspicion for associated intra-articular injuries resulting from graft failure in adolescent patients. SAGE Publications 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7534089/ /pubmed/33062768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120953337 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Rugg, Caitlin M. Pitcher, Austin A. Allen, Christina Pandya, Nirav K. Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients |
title | Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients |
title_full | Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients |
title_fullStr | Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients |
title_short | Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients |
title_sort | revision acl reconstruction in adolescent patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120953337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruggcaitlinm revisionaclreconstructioninadolescentpatients AT pitcheraustina revisionaclreconstructioninadolescentpatients AT allenchristina revisionaclreconstructioninadolescentpatients AT pandyaniravk revisionaclreconstructioninadolescentpatients |