Cargando…

Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients

BACKGROUND: High failure rates have been documented after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients, and revision surgery is indicated due to high activity levels of children and adolescents. PURPOSE: To define trends in revision ACLR in patients who underwent initial AC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rugg, Caitlin M., Pitcher, Austin A., Allen, Christina, Pandya, Nirav K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120953337
_version_ 1783590250383147008
author Rugg, Caitlin M.
Pitcher, Austin A.
Allen, Christina
Pandya, Nirav K.
author_facet Rugg, Caitlin M.
Pitcher, Austin A.
Allen, Christina
Pandya, Nirav K.
author_sort Rugg, Caitlin M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High failure rates have been documented after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients, and revision surgery is indicated due to high activity levels of children and adolescents. PURPOSE: To define trends in revision ACLR in patients who underwent initial ACLR at younger than 18 years. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: An electronic medical record was used to retrospectively identify revision ACLR procedures performed by 2 surgeons between the years 2010 and 2016 in patients younger than 18 years at initial reconstruction. Descriptive information, intraoperative findings, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation data were recorded from initial and revision surgeries. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (17 girls, 15 boys) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 15.8 years at initial reconstruction. For initial reconstructions, 15 patients underwent transphyseal procedures, 3 patients underwent adult-type procedures using an anatomic reconstruction technique that did not take into account the physis, and 2 patients underwent partial intraepiphyseal procedures. Graft types included hamstring autograft (n = 17), allograft (n = 5), hybrid (n = 4), and bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB; n = 3). Average primary reconstruction graft diameter was 8.0 mm (girls, 7.72 mm; boys, 8.36 mm; P = .045). After initial reconstruction, 10 patients had postoperative protocol noncompliance, and 8 patients reported delayed recovery. Mean time to retear was 565 days (range, 25-1539 days). At revision, BTB autograft was used in 50% (n = 16), followed by hamstring autograph (31.3%; n = 10) and allograft (12.5%; n = 4); mean graft diameter was 9.05 mm. Chondral surgery was more common during revision (25% for revision vs 0% for index; P = .031). There were 4 patients who required staged reconstruction with bone grafting. At mean final follow-up of 29.5 months (SD, 22.2 months), there were 3 graft failures (9.4%) and 5 contralateral ACL ruptures (15.6%). CONCLUSION: Most patients with ACL graft failure were adequately treated with a single revision. Conversion from a soft tissue graft to a BTB autograft was the most common procedure. Infrequently, patients required staged reconstructions. Providers should have a high index of suspicion for associated intra-articular injuries resulting from graft failure in adolescent patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7534089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75340892020-10-14 Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients Rugg, Caitlin M. Pitcher, Austin A. Allen, Christina Pandya, Nirav K. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: High failure rates have been documented after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients, and revision surgery is indicated due to high activity levels of children and adolescents. PURPOSE: To define trends in revision ACLR in patients who underwent initial ACLR at younger than 18 years. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: An electronic medical record was used to retrospectively identify revision ACLR procedures performed by 2 surgeons between the years 2010 and 2016 in patients younger than 18 years at initial reconstruction. Descriptive information, intraoperative findings, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation data were recorded from initial and revision surgeries. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (17 girls, 15 boys) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 15.8 years at initial reconstruction. For initial reconstructions, 15 patients underwent transphyseal procedures, 3 patients underwent adult-type procedures using an anatomic reconstruction technique that did not take into account the physis, and 2 patients underwent partial intraepiphyseal procedures. Graft types included hamstring autograft (n = 17), allograft (n = 5), hybrid (n = 4), and bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB; n = 3). Average primary reconstruction graft diameter was 8.0 mm (girls, 7.72 mm; boys, 8.36 mm; P = .045). After initial reconstruction, 10 patients had postoperative protocol noncompliance, and 8 patients reported delayed recovery. Mean time to retear was 565 days (range, 25-1539 days). At revision, BTB autograft was used in 50% (n = 16), followed by hamstring autograph (31.3%; n = 10) and allograft (12.5%; n = 4); mean graft diameter was 9.05 mm. Chondral surgery was more common during revision (25% for revision vs 0% for index; P = .031). There were 4 patients who required staged reconstruction with bone grafting. At mean final follow-up of 29.5 months (SD, 22.2 months), there were 3 graft failures (9.4%) and 5 contralateral ACL ruptures (15.6%). CONCLUSION: Most patients with ACL graft failure were adequately treated with a single revision. Conversion from a soft tissue graft to a BTB autograft was the most common procedure. Infrequently, patients required staged reconstructions. Providers should have a high index of suspicion for associated intra-articular injuries resulting from graft failure in adolescent patients. SAGE Publications 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7534089/ /pubmed/33062768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120953337 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Rugg, Caitlin M.
Pitcher, Austin A.
Allen, Christina
Pandya, Nirav K.
Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients
title Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients
title_full Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients
title_fullStr Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients
title_full_unstemmed Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients
title_short Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients
title_sort revision acl reconstruction in adolescent patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120953337
work_keys_str_mv AT ruggcaitlinm revisionaclreconstructioninadolescentpatients
AT pitcheraustina revisionaclreconstructioninadolescentpatients
AT allenchristina revisionaclreconstructioninadolescentpatients
AT pandyaniravk revisionaclreconstructioninadolescentpatients