Cargando…

Relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. It is important to understand direct comparisons of current interventions to differentiate favorable outcomes and complications. The objective of this study was to compare ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis versus systemic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antoine, David, Chuich, Taylor, Mylvaganam, Ruben, Malaisrie, Chris, Freed, Benjamin, Cuttica, Michael, Schimmel, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2045894020953724
_version_ 1783590250622222336
author Antoine, David
Chuich, Taylor
Mylvaganam, Ruben
Malaisrie, Chris
Freed, Benjamin
Cuttica, Michael
Schimmel, Daniel
author_facet Antoine, David
Chuich, Taylor
Mylvaganam, Ruben
Malaisrie, Chris
Freed, Benjamin
Cuttica, Michael
Schimmel, Daniel
author_sort Antoine, David
collection PubMed
description Pulmonary embolism is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. It is important to understand direct comparisons of current interventions to differentiate favorable outcomes and complications. The objective of this study was to compare ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis versus systemic thrombolysis versus anticoagulation alone and their effect on left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral. This was a retrospective cohort study of subjects ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of submassive or massive pulmonary embolism. The primary outcome was the percent change in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral between pre- and post-treatment echocardiograms. Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis compared to anticoagulation had a greater improvement in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral, measured by percent change. No significant change was noted between the ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis and systemic thrombolysis nor systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation groups. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure only showed a significant reduction in the ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis versus anticoagulation group. The percent change of right ventricular to left ventricular ratios was improved when systemic thrombolysis was compared to both ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis and anticoagulation. In this retrospective study of submassive or massive pulmonary embolisms, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral demonstrated greater improvement in patients treated with ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis as compared to anticoagulation alone, a finding not seen with systemic thrombolysis. While this improvement in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral parallels the trend seen in mortality outcomes across the three groups, it only correlates with changes seen in pulmonary artery systolic pressure, not in other markers of echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and right ventricular to left ventricular ratios). Changes in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral, rather than echocardiographic markers of right ventricular dysfunction, may be considered a more useful prognostic marker of both dysfunction and improvement after reperfusion therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7534090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75340902020-10-14 Relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism Antoine, David Chuich, Taylor Mylvaganam, Ruben Malaisrie, Chris Freed, Benjamin Cuttica, Michael Schimmel, Daniel Pulm Circ Research Article Pulmonary embolism is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. It is important to understand direct comparisons of current interventions to differentiate favorable outcomes and complications. The objective of this study was to compare ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis versus systemic thrombolysis versus anticoagulation alone and their effect on left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral. This was a retrospective cohort study of subjects ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of submassive or massive pulmonary embolism. The primary outcome was the percent change in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral between pre- and post-treatment echocardiograms. Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis compared to anticoagulation had a greater improvement in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral, measured by percent change. No significant change was noted between the ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis and systemic thrombolysis nor systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation groups. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure only showed a significant reduction in the ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis versus anticoagulation group. The percent change of right ventricular to left ventricular ratios was improved when systemic thrombolysis was compared to both ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis and anticoagulation. In this retrospective study of submassive or massive pulmonary embolisms, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral demonstrated greater improvement in patients treated with ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis as compared to anticoagulation alone, a finding not seen with systemic thrombolysis. While this improvement in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral parallels the trend seen in mortality outcomes across the three groups, it only correlates with changes seen in pulmonary artery systolic pressure, not in other markers of echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and right ventricular to left ventricular ratios). Changes in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral, rather than echocardiographic markers of right ventricular dysfunction, may be considered a more useful prognostic marker of both dysfunction and improvement after reperfusion therapy. SAGE Publications 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7534090/ /pubmed/33062260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2045894020953724 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Antoine, David
Chuich, Taylor
Mylvaganam, Ruben
Malaisrie, Chris
Freed, Benjamin
Cuttica, Michael
Schimmel, Daniel
Relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism
title Relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism
title_full Relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism
title_fullStr Relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism
title_short Relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism
title_sort relationship of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral to treatment strategy in submassive and massive pulmonary embolism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2045894020953724
work_keys_str_mv AT antoinedavid relationshipofleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegraltotreatmentstrategyinsubmassiveandmassivepulmonaryembolism
AT chuichtaylor relationshipofleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegraltotreatmentstrategyinsubmassiveandmassivepulmonaryembolism
AT mylvaganamruben relationshipofleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegraltotreatmentstrategyinsubmassiveandmassivepulmonaryembolism
AT malaisriechris relationshipofleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegraltotreatmentstrategyinsubmassiveandmassivepulmonaryembolism
AT freedbenjamin relationshipofleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegraltotreatmentstrategyinsubmassiveandmassivepulmonaryembolism
AT cutticamichael relationshipofleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegraltotreatmentstrategyinsubmassiveandmassivepulmonaryembolism
AT schimmeldaniel relationshipofleftventricularoutflowtractvelocitytimeintegraltotreatmentstrategyinsubmassiveandmassivepulmonaryembolism