Cargando…

Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients

BACKGROUND: To assess the diagnostic ability of Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) tomographic indices in discriminating keratoconus (KC) and KC suspect (KCS) in 10- to 30-year-old patients with Down syndrome (DS). METHODS: In this study, DS patients were enrolled through speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asgari, Soheila, Mehravaran, Shiva, Aghamirsalim, Mohammadreza, Hashemi, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00215-1
_version_ 1783590262730129408
author Asgari, Soheila
Mehravaran, Shiva
Aghamirsalim, Mohammadreza
Hashemi, Hassan
author_facet Asgari, Soheila
Mehravaran, Shiva
Aghamirsalim, Mohammadreza
Hashemi, Hassan
author_sort Asgari, Soheila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the diagnostic ability of Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) tomographic indices in discriminating keratoconus (KC) and KC suspect (KCS) in 10- to 30-year-old patients with Down syndrome (DS). METHODS: In this study, DS patients were enrolled through special needs schools, the National Down Syndrome Society, and relevant non-profit organizations. Diagnoses were made independently by two experienced specialists. Forty Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness, volume, density, keratometry, power, shape, aberration, and elevation were extracted. For each index, the accuracy for KC and KCS diagnosis was evaluated using discriminant analysis and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). From each enrolled case, data from only one eye was entered in the analyses. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on data from 25 KC, 46 KCS, and 154 non-ectatic DS eyes. The best discriminants for KC were anterior higher order aberrations (HOA) (cutoff > 0.643, AUROC = 0.879), posterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.0702 μm, AUROC = 0.875), anterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.4124 μm, AUROC = 0.868), and total HOA (cutoff > 0.608, AUROC = 0.867). The difference between AUROCs were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). For KCS, the best discriminants were minimum corneal thickness (cutoff ≤ 480.0 μm, AUROC = 0.775), corneal volume (cutoff ≤ 55.3 μm, AUROC = 0.727) and Belin Ambrosio display-total deviation (BAD-D) (cutoff > 2.23, AUROC = 0.718) with no significant difference between AUROCs (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of DS patients, best KC discriminators were HOA and coma which showed good diagnostic ability. For KCS, best predictors were minimum corneal thickness, corneal volume, and BAD-D with relatively good diagnostic ability. Defining a new set of KC diagnostic criteria for DS patients is suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7534157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75341572020-10-06 Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients Asgari, Soheila Mehravaran, Shiva Aghamirsalim, Mohammadreza Hashemi, Hassan Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: To assess the diagnostic ability of Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) tomographic indices in discriminating keratoconus (KC) and KC suspect (KCS) in 10- to 30-year-old patients with Down syndrome (DS). METHODS: In this study, DS patients were enrolled through special needs schools, the National Down Syndrome Society, and relevant non-profit organizations. Diagnoses were made independently by two experienced specialists. Forty Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness, volume, density, keratometry, power, shape, aberration, and elevation were extracted. For each index, the accuracy for KC and KCS diagnosis was evaluated using discriminant analysis and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). From each enrolled case, data from only one eye was entered in the analyses. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on data from 25 KC, 46 KCS, and 154 non-ectatic DS eyes. The best discriminants for KC were anterior higher order aberrations (HOA) (cutoff > 0.643, AUROC = 0.879), posterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.0702 μm, AUROC = 0.875), anterior vertical coma (cutoff > 0.4124 μm, AUROC = 0.868), and total HOA (cutoff > 0.608, AUROC = 0.867). The difference between AUROCs were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). For KCS, the best discriminants were minimum corneal thickness (cutoff ≤ 480.0 μm, AUROC = 0.775), corneal volume (cutoff ≤ 55.3 μm, AUROC = 0.727) and Belin Ambrosio display-total deviation (BAD-D) (cutoff > 2.23, AUROC = 0.718) with no significant difference between AUROCs (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of DS patients, best KC discriminators were HOA and coma which showed good diagnostic ability. For KCS, best predictors were minimum corneal thickness, corneal volume, and BAD-D with relatively good diagnostic ability. Defining a new set of KC diagnostic criteria for DS patients is suggested. BioMed Central 2020-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7534157/ /pubmed/33029546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00215-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Asgari, Soheila
Mehravaran, Shiva
Aghamirsalim, Mohammadreza
Hashemi, Hassan
Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients
title Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients
title_full Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients
title_fullStr Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients
title_full_unstemmed Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients
title_short Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients
title_sort tomography-based definition of keratoconus for down syndrome patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00215-1
work_keys_str_mv AT asgarisoheila tomographybaseddefinitionofkeratoconusfordownsyndromepatients
AT mehravaranshiva tomographybaseddefinitionofkeratoconusfordownsyndromepatients
AT aghamirsalimmohammadreza tomographybaseddefinitionofkeratoconusfordownsyndromepatients
AT hashemihassan tomographybaseddefinitionofkeratoconusfordownsyndromepatients