Cargando…

Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement

Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Drongelen, Stefan, Wesseling, Mariska, Holder, Jana, Meurer, Andrea, Stief, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030
_version_ 1783590308064264192
author van Drongelen, Stefan
Wesseling, Mariska
Holder, Jana
Meurer, Andrea
Stief, Felix
author_facet van Drongelen, Stefan
Wesseling, Mariska
Holder, Jana
Meurer, Andrea
Stief, Felix
author_sort van Drongelen, Stefan
collection PubMed
description Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The knee adduction moment is a surrogate for the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and not a valid measure for the tibiofemoral contact forces which are the result of externally applied forces and muscle forces. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the distribution of the tibiofemoral contact forces over the knee compartments in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients 1 year after receiving a primary total hip replacement differs from healthy controls. Musculoskeletal modeling on gait was performed in OpenSim using the detailed knee model of Lerner et al. (2015) for 19 patients as well as for 15 healthy controls of similar age. Knee adduction moments were calculated by the inverse dynamics analysis, medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces with the joint reaction force analysis. Moments and contact forces of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping two-sample t-tests. Knee adduction moments and medial tibiofemoral contact forces of both the ipsi- and contralateral leg were not significantly different compared to healthy controls. The contralateral leg showed 14% higher medial tibiofemoral contact forces compared to the ipsilateral (operated) leg during the second half of stance. During the first half of stance, the lateral tibiofemoral contact force of the contralateral leg was 39% lower and the ratio 32% lower compared to healthy controls. In contrast, during the second half of stance the forces were significantly higher (39 and 26%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The higher ratio indicates a changed distribution whereas the increased lateral tibiofemoral contact forces indicate a higher lateral knee joint loading in the contralateral leg in OA patients after total hip replacement (THR). Musculoskeletal modeling using a detailed knee model can be useful to detect differences in the load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartment which cannot be verified with the knee adduction moment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7534409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75344092020-10-15 Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement van Drongelen, Stefan Wesseling, Mariska Holder, Jana Meurer, Andrea Stief, Felix Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The knee adduction moment is a surrogate for the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and not a valid measure for the tibiofemoral contact forces which are the result of externally applied forces and muscle forces. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the distribution of the tibiofemoral contact forces over the knee compartments in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients 1 year after receiving a primary total hip replacement differs from healthy controls. Musculoskeletal modeling on gait was performed in OpenSim using the detailed knee model of Lerner et al. (2015) for 19 patients as well as for 15 healthy controls of similar age. Knee adduction moments were calculated by the inverse dynamics analysis, medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces with the joint reaction force analysis. Moments and contact forces of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping two-sample t-tests. Knee adduction moments and medial tibiofemoral contact forces of both the ipsi- and contralateral leg were not significantly different compared to healthy controls. The contralateral leg showed 14% higher medial tibiofemoral contact forces compared to the ipsilateral (operated) leg during the second half of stance. During the first half of stance, the lateral tibiofemoral contact force of the contralateral leg was 39% lower and the ratio 32% lower compared to healthy controls. In contrast, during the second half of stance the forces were significantly higher (39 and 26%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The higher ratio indicates a changed distribution whereas the increased lateral tibiofemoral contact forces indicate a higher lateral knee joint loading in the contralateral leg in OA patients after total hip replacement (THR). Musculoskeletal modeling using a detailed knee model can be useful to detect differences in the load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartment which cannot be verified with the knee adduction moment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7534409/ /pubmed/33072728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030 Text en Copyright © 2020 van Drongelen, Wesseling, Holder, Meurer and Stief. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
van Drongelen, Stefan
Wesseling, Mariska
Holder, Jana
Meurer, Andrea
Stief, Felix
Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_full Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_fullStr Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_full_unstemmed Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_short Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
title_sort knee load distribution in hip osteoarthritis patients after total hip replacement
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030
work_keys_str_mv AT vandrongelenstefan kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT wesselingmariska kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT holderjana kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT meurerandrea kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement
AT stieffelix kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement