Cargando…
Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement
Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The k...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030 |
_version_ | 1783590308064264192 |
---|---|
author | van Drongelen, Stefan Wesseling, Mariska Holder, Jana Meurer, Andrea Stief, Felix |
author_facet | van Drongelen, Stefan Wesseling, Mariska Holder, Jana Meurer, Andrea Stief, Felix |
author_sort | van Drongelen, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The knee adduction moment is a surrogate for the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and not a valid measure for the tibiofemoral contact forces which are the result of externally applied forces and muscle forces. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the distribution of the tibiofemoral contact forces over the knee compartments in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients 1 year after receiving a primary total hip replacement differs from healthy controls. Musculoskeletal modeling on gait was performed in OpenSim using the detailed knee model of Lerner et al. (2015) for 19 patients as well as for 15 healthy controls of similar age. Knee adduction moments were calculated by the inverse dynamics analysis, medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces with the joint reaction force analysis. Moments and contact forces of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping two-sample t-tests. Knee adduction moments and medial tibiofemoral contact forces of both the ipsi- and contralateral leg were not significantly different compared to healthy controls. The contralateral leg showed 14% higher medial tibiofemoral contact forces compared to the ipsilateral (operated) leg during the second half of stance. During the first half of stance, the lateral tibiofemoral contact force of the contralateral leg was 39% lower and the ratio 32% lower compared to healthy controls. In contrast, during the second half of stance the forces were significantly higher (39 and 26%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The higher ratio indicates a changed distribution whereas the increased lateral tibiofemoral contact forces indicate a higher lateral knee joint loading in the contralateral leg in OA patients after total hip replacement (THR). Musculoskeletal modeling using a detailed knee model can be useful to detect differences in the load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartment which cannot be verified with the knee adduction moment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7534409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75344092020-10-15 Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement van Drongelen, Stefan Wesseling, Mariska Holder, Jana Meurer, Andrea Stief, Felix Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Reduced external knee adduction moments in the second half of stance after total hip replacement have been reported in hip osteoarthritis patients. This reduction is thought to shift the load from the medial to the lateral knee compartment and as such increase the risk for knee osteoarthritis. The knee adduction moment is a surrogate for the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee and not a valid measure for the tibiofemoral contact forces which are the result of externally applied forces and muscle forces. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the distribution of the tibiofemoral contact forces over the knee compartments in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients 1 year after receiving a primary total hip replacement differs from healthy controls. Musculoskeletal modeling on gait was performed in OpenSim using the detailed knee model of Lerner et al. (2015) for 19 patients as well as for 15 healthy controls of similar age. Knee adduction moments were calculated by the inverse dynamics analysis, medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces with the joint reaction force analysis. Moments and contact forces of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping two-sample t-tests. Knee adduction moments and medial tibiofemoral contact forces of both the ipsi- and contralateral leg were not significantly different compared to healthy controls. The contralateral leg showed 14% higher medial tibiofemoral contact forces compared to the ipsilateral (operated) leg during the second half of stance. During the first half of stance, the lateral tibiofemoral contact force of the contralateral leg was 39% lower and the ratio 32% lower compared to healthy controls. In contrast, during the second half of stance the forces were significantly higher (39 and 26%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. The higher ratio indicates a changed distribution whereas the increased lateral tibiofemoral contact forces indicate a higher lateral knee joint loading in the contralateral leg in OA patients after total hip replacement (THR). Musculoskeletal modeling using a detailed knee model can be useful to detect differences in the load distribution between the medial and lateral knee compartment which cannot be verified with the knee adduction moment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7534409/ /pubmed/33072728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030 Text en Copyright © 2020 van Drongelen, Wesseling, Holder, Meurer and Stief. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology van Drongelen, Stefan Wesseling, Mariska Holder, Jana Meurer, Andrea Stief, Felix Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement |
title | Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement |
title_full | Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement |
title_fullStr | Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement |
title_short | Knee Load Distribution in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients After Total Hip Replacement |
title_sort | knee load distribution in hip osteoarthritis patients after total hip replacement |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandrongelenstefan kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement AT wesselingmariska kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement AT holderjana kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement AT meurerandrea kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement AT stieffelix kneeloaddistributioninhiposteoarthritispatientsaftertotalhipreplacement |