Cargando…

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND: To determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which may be suitable for incorporation into the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Data Registry (ACFDR) by identifying PROMs administered in adult and paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) populations in the last decade. METHODS: We searched MED...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratnayake, Irushi, Ahern, Susannah, Ruseckaite, Rasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33004381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033867
_version_ 1783590349190463488
author Ratnayake, Irushi
Ahern, Susannah
Ruseckaite, Rasa
author_facet Ratnayake, Irushi
Ahern, Susannah
Ruseckaite, Rasa
author_sort Ratnayake, Irushi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which may be suitable for incorporation into the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Data Registry (ACFDR) by identifying PROMs administered in adult and paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) populations in the last decade. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases for studies published between January 2009 and February 2019 describing the use of PROMs to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult and paediatric patients with CF. Validation studies, observational studies and qualitative studies were included. The search was conducted on 13 February 2019. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments Risk of Bias Checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. RESULTS: Twenty-seven different PROMs were identified. The most commonly used PROMs were designed specifically for CF. Equal numbers of studies were conducted on adult (32%, n=31), paediatric (35%, n=34) and both (27%, n=26) populations. No PROMs were used within a clinical registry setting previously. The two most widely used PROMs, the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire—Revised (CFQ-R) and the Cystic Fibrosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (CFQoL), demonstrated good psychometric properties and acceptability in English-speaking populations. DISCUSSION: We found that although PROMs are widely used in CF, there is a lack of reporting on the efficacy of methods and timepoints of administration. We identified the CFQ-R and CFQoL as the most suitable for incorporation in the ACFDR as they captured significant effects of CF on HRQoL and were reliable and valid in CF populations. These PROMs will be used in a further qualitative study assessing patients’ with CF and clinicians’ perspectives toward the acceptability and feasibility of incorporating a PROM in the ACFDR. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019126931.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7534676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75346762020-10-07 A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis Ratnayake, Irushi Ahern, Susannah Ruseckaite, Rasa BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine BACKGROUND: To determine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which may be suitable for incorporation into the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Data Registry (ACFDR) by identifying PROMs administered in adult and paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) populations in the last decade. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases for studies published between January 2009 and February 2019 describing the use of PROMs to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult and paediatric patients with CF. Validation studies, observational studies and qualitative studies were included. The search was conducted on 13 February 2019. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments Risk of Bias Checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. RESULTS: Twenty-seven different PROMs were identified. The most commonly used PROMs were designed specifically for CF. Equal numbers of studies were conducted on adult (32%, n=31), paediatric (35%, n=34) and both (27%, n=26) populations. No PROMs were used within a clinical registry setting previously. The two most widely used PROMs, the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire—Revised (CFQ-R) and the Cystic Fibrosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (CFQoL), demonstrated good psychometric properties and acceptability in English-speaking populations. DISCUSSION: We found that although PROMs are widely used in CF, there is a lack of reporting on the efficacy of methods and timepoints of administration. We identified the CFQ-R and CFQoL as the most suitable for incorporation in the ACFDR as they captured significant effects of CF on HRQoL and were reliable and valid in CF populations. These PROMs will be used in a further qualitative study assessing patients’ with CF and clinicians’ perspectives toward the acceptability and feasibility of incorporating a PROM in the ACFDR. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019126931. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7534676/ /pubmed/33004381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033867 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Respiratory Medicine
Ratnayake, Irushi
Ahern, Susannah
Ruseckaite, Rasa
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis
title A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis
title_full A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis
title_fullStr A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis
title_short A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis
title_sort systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (proms) in cystic fibrosis
topic Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33004381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033867
work_keys_str_mv AT ratnayakeirushi asystematicreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsincysticfibrosis
AT ahernsusannah asystematicreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsincysticfibrosis
AT ruseckaiterasa asystematicreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsincysticfibrosis
AT ratnayakeirushi systematicreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsincysticfibrosis
AT ahernsusannah systematicreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsincysticfibrosis
AT ruseckaiterasa systematicreviewofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsincysticfibrosis