Cargando…
Fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals
As coral reefs continue to decline globally, coral restoration practitioners have explored various approaches to return coral cover and diversity to decimated reefs. While branching coral species have long been the focus of restoration efforts, the recent development of the microfragmentation coral...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062430 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9978 |
_version_ | 1783590349443170304 |
---|---|
author | Koval, Gammon Rivas, Nicolas D’Alessandro, Martine Hesley, Dalton Santos, Rolando Lirman, Diego |
author_facet | Koval, Gammon Rivas, Nicolas D’Alessandro, Martine Hesley, Dalton Santos, Rolando Lirman, Diego |
author_sort | Koval, Gammon |
collection | PubMed |
description | As coral reefs continue to decline globally, coral restoration practitioners have explored various approaches to return coral cover and diversity to decimated reefs. While branching coral species have long been the focus of restoration efforts, the recent development of the microfragmentation coral propagation technique has made it possible to incorporate massive coral species into restoration efforts. Microfragmentation (i.e., the process of cutting large donor colonies into small fragments that grow fast) has yielded promising early results. Still, best practices for outplanting fragmented corals of massive morphologies are continuing to be developed and modified to maximize survivorship. Here, we compared outplant success among four species of massive corals (Orbicella faveolata, Montastraea cavernosa, Pseudodiploria clivosa, and P. strigosa) in Southeast Florida, US. Within the first week following coral deployment, predation impacts by fish on the small (<5 cm(2)) outplanted colonies resulted in both the complete removal of colonies and significant tissue damage, as evidenced by bite marks. In our study, 8–27% of fragments from four species were removed by fish within one week, with removal rates slowing down over time. Of the corals that remained after one week, over 9% showed signs of fish predation. Our findings showed that predation by corallivorous fish taxa like butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae), parrotfishes (Scaridae), and damselfishes (Pomacentridae) is a major threat to coral outplants, and that susceptibility varied significantly among coral species and outplanting method. Moreover, we identify factors that reduce predation impacts such as: (1) using cement instead of glue to attach corals, (2) elevating fragments off the substrate, and (3) limiting the amount of skeleton exposed at the time of outplanting. These strategies are essential to maximizing the efficiency of outplanting techniques and enhancing the impact of reef restoration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7534677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75346772020-10-14 Fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals Koval, Gammon Rivas, Nicolas D’Alessandro, Martine Hesley, Dalton Santos, Rolando Lirman, Diego PeerJ Conservation Biology As coral reefs continue to decline globally, coral restoration practitioners have explored various approaches to return coral cover and diversity to decimated reefs. While branching coral species have long been the focus of restoration efforts, the recent development of the microfragmentation coral propagation technique has made it possible to incorporate massive coral species into restoration efforts. Microfragmentation (i.e., the process of cutting large donor colonies into small fragments that grow fast) has yielded promising early results. Still, best practices for outplanting fragmented corals of massive morphologies are continuing to be developed and modified to maximize survivorship. Here, we compared outplant success among four species of massive corals (Orbicella faveolata, Montastraea cavernosa, Pseudodiploria clivosa, and P. strigosa) in Southeast Florida, US. Within the first week following coral deployment, predation impacts by fish on the small (<5 cm(2)) outplanted colonies resulted in both the complete removal of colonies and significant tissue damage, as evidenced by bite marks. In our study, 8–27% of fragments from four species were removed by fish within one week, with removal rates slowing down over time. Of the corals that remained after one week, over 9% showed signs of fish predation. Our findings showed that predation by corallivorous fish taxa like butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae), parrotfishes (Scaridae), and damselfishes (Pomacentridae) is a major threat to coral outplants, and that susceptibility varied significantly among coral species and outplanting method. Moreover, we identify factors that reduce predation impacts such as: (1) using cement instead of glue to attach corals, (2) elevating fragments off the substrate, and (3) limiting the amount of skeleton exposed at the time of outplanting. These strategies are essential to maximizing the efficiency of outplanting techniques and enhancing the impact of reef restoration. PeerJ Inc. 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7534677/ /pubmed/33062430 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9978 Text en ©2020 Koval et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Conservation Biology Koval, Gammon Rivas, Nicolas D’Alessandro, Martine Hesley, Dalton Santos, Rolando Lirman, Diego Fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals |
title | Fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals |
title_full | Fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals |
title_fullStr | Fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals |
title_full_unstemmed | Fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals |
title_short | Fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals |
title_sort | fish predation hinders the success of coral restoration efforts using fragmented massive corals |
topic | Conservation Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33062430 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kovalgammon fishpredationhindersthesuccessofcoralrestorationeffortsusingfragmentedmassivecorals AT rivasnicolas fishpredationhindersthesuccessofcoralrestorationeffortsusingfragmentedmassivecorals AT dalessandromartine fishpredationhindersthesuccessofcoralrestorationeffortsusingfragmentedmassivecorals AT hesleydalton fishpredationhindersthesuccessofcoralrestorationeffortsusingfragmentedmassivecorals AT santosrolando fishpredationhindersthesuccessofcoralrestorationeffortsusingfragmentedmassivecorals AT lirmandiego fishpredationhindersthesuccessofcoralrestorationeffortsusingfragmentedmassivecorals |