Cargando…

Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Peri-prosthetic shoulder infection (PSI), a highly disabling complication of shoulder arthroplasty, often requires additional surgery and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Of strategies proposed to manage this devastating condition, the use of cement spacers, perhaps even as a definitive tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia, Repetto, Ilaria, Russo, Antonio, Clemente, Antonio, Ventura, Niccolò, Formica, Matteo, Burastero, Giorgio, Felli, Lamberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-020-09755-7
_version_ 1783590382136721408
author Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia
Repetto, Ilaria
Russo, Antonio
Clemente, Antonio
Ventura, Niccolò
Formica, Matteo
Burastero, Giorgio
Felli, Lamberto
author_facet Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia
Repetto, Ilaria
Russo, Antonio
Clemente, Antonio
Ventura, Niccolò
Formica, Matteo
Burastero, Giorgio
Felli, Lamberto
author_sort Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peri-prosthetic shoulder infection (PSI), a highly disabling complication of shoulder arthroplasty, often requires additional surgery and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Of strategies proposed to manage this devastating condition, the use of cement spacers, perhaps even as a definitive treatment, is debated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to systematically review the literature on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers as a viable, perhaps definitive, treatment for PSI, evaluating the eradication rates, mechanical reliability, and functional results related to its use. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 1, 1980, through September 1, 2019. Following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, we searched for studies reporting functional and clinical outcomes in patients with PSI treated with a permanent spacer of the shoulder. Two independent reviewers searched eight databases, as well as reference lists of the retrieved articles. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria were applied, 12 studies were included, involving a total of 143 patients. The mean age was 65.8 years; the mean follow-up was 37.4 months. A total of 133 patients (93%) were free from infection at latest follow-up. The mean post-operative active elevation of the shoulder ranged from 48.6 to 90°, the mean abduction ranged from 51 to 75°, and external rotation ranged from 3.6 to 29°. The mean Constant–Murley score ranged from 20.6 to 42 points (out of 100, from worst to best). CONCLUSION: The use of a permanent cement spacer is a reliable solution to PSI in low-demand, older patients with comorbidities, a population in whom it is desirable to avoid additional surgery. Our review found a high rate of infection eradication and moderate-to-good objective and subjective results. However, the overall level of evidence of included studies was very low, and higher-quality studies are needed to clarify the role of permanent spacers in the treatment of PSI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11420-020-09755-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7534885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75348852020-10-19 Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia Repetto, Ilaria Russo, Antonio Clemente, Antonio Ventura, Niccolò Formica, Matteo Burastero, Giorgio Felli, Lamberto HSS J Review Article BACKGROUND: Peri-prosthetic shoulder infection (PSI), a highly disabling complication of shoulder arthroplasty, often requires additional surgery and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Of strategies proposed to manage this devastating condition, the use of cement spacers, perhaps even as a definitive treatment, is debated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to systematically review the literature on antibiotic-loaded cement spacers as a viable, perhaps definitive, treatment for PSI, evaluating the eradication rates, mechanical reliability, and functional results related to its use. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 1, 1980, through September 1, 2019. Following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, we searched for studies reporting functional and clinical outcomes in patients with PSI treated with a permanent spacer of the shoulder. Two independent reviewers searched eight databases, as well as reference lists of the retrieved articles. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria were applied, 12 studies were included, involving a total of 143 patients. The mean age was 65.8 years; the mean follow-up was 37.4 months. A total of 133 patients (93%) were free from infection at latest follow-up. The mean post-operative active elevation of the shoulder ranged from 48.6 to 90°, the mean abduction ranged from 51 to 75°, and external rotation ranged from 3.6 to 29°. The mean Constant–Murley score ranged from 20.6 to 42 points (out of 100, from worst to best). CONCLUSION: The use of a permanent cement spacer is a reliable solution to PSI in low-demand, older patients with comorbidities, a population in whom it is desirable to avoid additional surgery. Our review found a high rate of infection eradication and moderate-to-good objective and subjective results. However, the overall level of evidence of included studies was very low, and higher-quality studies are needed to clarify the role of permanent spacers in the treatment of PSI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11420-020-09755-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-04-08 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7534885/ /pubmed/33082722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-020-09755-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Alessio-Mazzola, Mattia
Repetto, Ilaria
Russo, Antonio
Clemente, Antonio
Ventura, Niccolò
Formica, Matteo
Burastero, Giorgio
Felli, Lamberto
Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review
title Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review
title_full Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review
title_short Permanent Spacers Are a Reliable Solution for Peri-prosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Systematic Review
title_sort permanent spacers are a reliable solution for peri-prosthetic shoulder infection: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7534885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11420-020-09755-7
work_keys_str_mv AT alessiomazzolamattia permanentspacersareareliablesolutionforperiprostheticshoulderinfectionasystematicreview
AT repettoilaria permanentspacersareareliablesolutionforperiprostheticshoulderinfectionasystematicreview
AT russoantonio permanentspacersareareliablesolutionforperiprostheticshoulderinfectionasystematicreview
AT clementeantonio permanentspacersareareliablesolutionforperiprostheticshoulderinfectionasystematicreview
AT venturaniccolo permanentspacersareareliablesolutionforperiprostheticshoulderinfectionasystematicreview
AT formicamatteo permanentspacersareareliablesolutionforperiprostheticshoulderinfectionasystematicreview
AT burasterogiorgio permanentspacersareareliablesolutionforperiprostheticshoulderinfectionasystematicreview
AT fellilamberto permanentspacersareareliablesolutionforperiprostheticshoulderinfectionasystematicreview