Cargando…

The therapeutic effects of silymarin for patients with glucose/lipid metabolic dysfunction: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To comprehensively evaluate the treatment efficacy and safety of silymarin for patients with glucose/lipid metabolic dysfunction using a meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed up to October 1, 2019. STATA 13.0...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Fengyan, Gao, Feng, Zhou, Shengxue, Wang, Lina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7535778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33019400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022249
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To comprehensively evaluate the treatment efficacy and safety of silymarin for patients with glucose/lipid metabolic dysfunction using a meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed up to October 1, 2019. STATA 13.0 software was used to estimate pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Sixteen studies involving 1358 patients were identified. Overall meta-analysis showed that compared with control, silymarin significantly reduced levels of fasting blood glucose (SMD: −1.27, 95% CI = [−1.78, −0.76]; P < .001), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (SMD: −0.41, 95% CI = [−0.70, −0.12]; P = .005), hemoglobin A1c (SMD: −1.88, 95% CI = [−2.57, −1.20]; P < .001), total cholesterol (SMD: −1.13, 95% CI = [−1.82, −0.77]; P < .001), triglyceride (SMD: −0.37, 95% CI = [−0.69, −0.05]; P = .025), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (SMD: −1.30, 95% CI = [−1.93, −0.67]; P < .001), C-reactive protein (SMD: −0.63, 95% CI = [−1.01, −0.27]; P = .001), and increased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (SMD: 0.17, 95% CI = [0.05, 0.29]; P = .005), but had no impacts on function indicators of liver and kidney (alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine phosphokinase, creatinine) and the complication rate. Subgroup analyses indicated that insulin (which was negative in overall analysis) was significantly decreased in patients undergoing silymarin monotherapy (SMD: −2.03, 95% CI = [−3.03, −1.04]; P = .044) for more than 3 months (SMD: −0.01, 95% CI = [−0.25, −0.24]; P = .035). CONCLUSION: Supplementation of silymarin may be effective and safe for the management of diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia.