Cargando…
Evaluating the Abrasivity of a Nanosized Eggshell–Titanium Dioxide on Tooth Enamel Using Atomic Force Microscopy
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate nanosized eggshell–titanium dioxide (EB@TiO (2) ) abrasiveness in comparison with calcium carbonate and hydrated silica-containing toothpaste. Material and Methods Thirty-five bovine tooth enamels were prepared, and specimens randomly assigned to a sample gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7535973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32777839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714172 |
Sumario: | Objectives This study aimed to evaluate nanosized eggshell–titanium dioxide (EB@TiO (2) ) abrasiveness in comparison with calcium carbonate and hydrated silica-containing toothpaste. Material and Methods Thirty-five bovine tooth enamels were prepared, and specimens randomly assigned to a sample group of five ( n = 7), namely, Colgate regular, Colgate pro-relief, Sensodyne rapid relief, Sensodyne repair, and EB@TiO (2) . Half of the enamel surface was brushed with each respective sample group, while the other half was covered with a tap. Statistical Analysis The mean roughness value (Ra) of the brushed and covered halves were measured using an atomic force microscope (AFM). To assess the surface morphology and changes, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was performed. Using pair sample test and ANOVA, the Ra for the entire specimens were analyzed. A Bonferroni correction was used to identify the mean differences among the five groups (α=.05). Results The findings from this analysis show that all the tested toothpaste abraded the enamel significantly ( p < 0.05). The abrasive value contained in toothpaste comprising calcium carbonate was lower than the silica toothpaste hydrated. Conclusion Overall, Colgate regular had the lowest toothpaste abrasivity, followed by EB@TiO2, while Sensodyne rapid relief had the most enamel wear. The prominent feature of this study suggests that EB@TiO2 is suitable for oral use, as its abrasivity is comparable with calcium carbonate-containing toothpaste. |
---|