Cargando…

Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin

Objective  Preheated resins (PR) are considered a cementing agent option for indirect adhesive restorations of composite inlays and onlays. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal sealing, adhesive interface, and microtensile bond strength of indirect adhesive restorations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urcuyo Alvarado, Manuel Salvador, Escobar García, Diana María, Pozos Guillén, Amaury de Jesús, Flores Arriaga, Juan Carlos, Romo Ramírez, Gabriel Fernando, Ortiz Magdaleno, Marine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32932533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716630
_version_ 1783590490219741184
author Urcuyo Alvarado, Manuel Salvador
Escobar García, Diana María
Pozos Guillén, Amaury de Jesús
Flores Arriaga, Juan Carlos
Romo Ramírez, Gabriel Fernando
Ortiz Magdaleno, Marine
author_facet Urcuyo Alvarado, Manuel Salvador
Escobar García, Diana María
Pozos Guillén, Amaury de Jesús
Flores Arriaga, Juan Carlos
Romo Ramírez, Gabriel Fernando
Ortiz Magdaleno, Marine
author_sort Urcuyo Alvarado, Manuel Salvador
collection PubMed
description Objective  Preheated resins (PR) are considered a cementing agent option for indirect adhesive restorations of composite inlays and onlays. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal sealing, adhesive interface, and microtensile bond strength of indirect adhesive restorations of composites in terms of dentin cemented with PR. Materials and Methods  Standardized Class II preparations were performed on 30 extracted human premolars, impressions were taken, and indirect composite restorations were manufactured. In total, 15 restorations were cemented with PR (ENA HRi, SYNCA), and 15 restorations were cemented with self-adhesive resinous cement (RC) (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE), followed by a thermocycling regime. After that, these were segmented sagittally and longitudinally to evaluate the marginal sealing and the adhesive interface with scanning electron microscopy and confocal microscopy. Microtensile bond strength was assessed with a mechanical device (TA. XT Plus C, Stable Micro System). Statistical analysis  Statistical analysis was conducted using the two-sample Student’s t -test. Results  The results showed that there is no statistically significant difference in the degree of microfiltration using PR or RC; however, microtensile bond strength is greater when the restoration is cemented with RC (278.75 N/cm (3) ) than with PR (144.49 N/cm (3) ), and better adjustment and sealing were observed for composite restorations with PR. Conclusion  PR comprise an alternative cementing agent for indirect composite restorations in Class II cavities in premolars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7536092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75360922020-10-09 Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin Urcuyo Alvarado, Manuel Salvador Escobar García, Diana María Pozos Guillén, Amaury de Jesús Flores Arriaga, Juan Carlos Romo Ramírez, Gabriel Fernando Ortiz Magdaleno, Marine Eur J Dent Objective  Preheated resins (PR) are considered a cementing agent option for indirect adhesive restorations of composite inlays and onlays. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal sealing, adhesive interface, and microtensile bond strength of indirect adhesive restorations of composites in terms of dentin cemented with PR. Materials and Methods  Standardized Class II preparations were performed on 30 extracted human premolars, impressions were taken, and indirect composite restorations were manufactured. In total, 15 restorations were cemented with PR (ENA HRi, SYNCA), and 15 restorations were cemented with self-adhesive resinous cement (RC) (Relyx U200, 3M ESPE), followed by a thermocycling regime. After that, these were segmented sagittally and longitudinally to evaluate the marginal sealing and the adhesive interface with scanning electron microscopy and confocal microscopy. Microtensile bond strength was assessed with a mechanical device (TA. XT Plus C, Stable Micro System). Statistical analysis  Statistical analysis was conducted using the two-sample Student’s t -test. Results  The results showed that there is no statistically significant difference in the degree of microfiltration using PR or RC; however, microtensile bond strength is greater when the restoration is cemented with RC (278.75 N/cm (3) ) than with PR (144.49 N/cm (3) ), and better adjustment and sealing were observed for composite restorations with PR. Conclusion  PR comprise an alternative cementing agent for indirect composite restorations in Class II cavities in premolars. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. 2020-10 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7536092/ /pubmed/32932533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716630 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Urcuyo Alvarado, Manuel Salvador
Escobar García, Diana María
Pozos Guillén, Amaury de Jesús
Flores Arriaga, Juan Carlos
Romo Ramírez, Gabriel Fernando
Ortiz Magdaleno, Marine
Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin
title Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin
title_full Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin
title_short Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin
title_sort evaluation of the bond strength and marginal seal of indirect restorations of composites bonded with preheating resin
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32932533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716630
work_keys_str_mv AT urcuyoalvaradomanuelsalvador evaluationofthebondstrengthandmarginalsealofindirectrestorationsofcompositesbondedwithpreheatingresin
AT escobargarciadianamaria evaluationofthebondstrengthandmarginalsealofindirectrestorationsofcompositesbondedwithpreheatingresin
AT pozosguillenamaurydejesus evaluationofthebondstrengthandmarginalsealofindirectrestorationsofcompositesbondedwithpreheatingresin
AT floresarriagajuancarlos evaluationofthebondstrengthandmarginalsealofindirectrestorationsofcompositesbondedwithpreheatingresin
AT romoramirezgabrielfernando evaluationofthebondstrengthandmarginalsealofindirectrestorationsofcompositesbondedwithpreheatingresin
AT ortizmagdalenomarine evaluationofthebondstrengthandmarginalsealofindirectrestorationsofcompositesbondedwithpreheatingresin