Cargando…
A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm
This paper intends to contribute with a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to support risk evaluation for maintenance activities carried out on critical systems in industry. We propose to first select the best maintenance strategy tailored to companies’ requirements and systems’ feature...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107265 |
_version_ | 1783590499824697344 |
---|---|
author | Carpitella, Silvia Mzougui, Ilyas Benítez, Julio Carpitella, Fortunato Certa, Antonella Izquierdo, Joaquín La Cascia, Marco |
author_facet | Carpitella, Silvia Mzougui, Ilyas Benítez, Julio Carpitella, Fortunato Certa, Antonella Izquierdo, Joaquín La Cascia, Marco |
author_sort | Carpitella, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper intends to contribute with a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to support risk evaluation for maintenance activities carried out on critical systems in industry. We propose to first select the best maintenance strategy tailored to companies’ requirements and systems’ features, and second to perform a risk prioritisation aimed at highlighting priorities of intervention. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is suggested to select the maintenance policy representing the best trade-off considering the complex and varied interdependencies amongst a diversity of clustered elements characterising the system. Then, the main risks related to the interventions associated to the selected maintenance policy are ranked using the ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité III (ELECTRE III) method, using the same criteria weighted by the previous ANP application. This hybrid MCDM framework is applied to a core subsystem of a real-world marine salt manufacture firm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7536138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75361382020-10-06 A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm Carpitella, Silvia Mzougui, Ilyas Benítez, Julio Carpitella, Fortunato Certa, Antonella Izquierdo, Joaquín La Cascia, Marco Reliab Eng Syst Saf Article This paper intends to contribute with a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to support risk evaluation for maintenance activities carried out on critical systems in industry. We propose to first select the best maintenance strategy tailored to companies’ requirements and systems’ features, and second to perform a risk prioritisation aimed at highlighting priorities of intervention. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is suggested to select the maintenance policy representing the best trade-off considering the complex and varied interdependencies amongst a diversity of clustered elements characterising the system. Then, the main risks related to the interventions associated to the selected maintenance policy are ranked using the ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité III (ELECTRE III) method, using the same criteria weighted by the previous ANP application. This hybrid MCDM framework is applied to a core subsystem of a real-world marine salt manufacture firm. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-01 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7536138/ /pubmed/33041526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107265 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Carpitella, Silvia Mzougui, Ilyas Benítez, Julio Carpitella, Fortunato Certa, Antonella Izquierdo, Joaquín La Cascia, Marco A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm |
title | A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm |
title_full | A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm |
title_fullStr | A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm |
title_full_unstemmed | A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm |
title_short | A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm |
title_sort | risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: the case of a marine salt manufacture firm |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carpitellasilvia ariskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT mzouguiilyas ariskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT benitezjulio ariskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT carpitellafortunato ariskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT certaantonella ariskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT izquierdojoaquin ariskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT lacasciamarco ariskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT carpitellasilvia riskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT mzouguiilyas riskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT benitezjulio riskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT carpitellafortunato riskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT certaantonella riskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT izquierdojoaquin riskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm AT lacasciamarco riskevaluationframeworkforthebestmaintenancestrategythecaseofamarinesaltmanufacturefirm |