Cargando…
Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward?
BACKGROUND: The transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) approach for right-side colon surgery has been proven to exhibit favorable short-term outcomes. However, thus far, no study has reported the advantages of transrectal NOSE for right-side colon surgery. The aim of this study was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02282-x |
_version_ | 1783590502388465664 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, C.-C. Hsu, Y.-R. Chern, Y.-J. Tsai, W.-S. Hung, H.-Y. Liao, C.-K. Chiang, J.-M. Hsieh, P.-S. You, J.-F. |
author_facet | Cheng, C.-C. Hsu, Y.-R. Chern, Y.-J. Tsai, W.-S. Hung, H.-Y. Liao, C.-K. Chiang, J.-M. Hsieh, P.-S. You, J.-F. |
author_sort | Cheng, C.-C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) approach for right-side colon surgery has been proven to exhibit favorable short-term outcomes. However, thus far, no study has reported the advantages of transrectal NOSE for right-side colon surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the technical feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy using the transrectal NOSE method and those of conventional mini-laparotomy specimen extraction. METHODS: A study was conducted on consecutive patients who had minimally invasive right hemicolectomy either for malignancy or benign disease at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, between January 2017 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: conventional surgery with specimen extraction using mini-laparotomy and NOSE surgery. Surgical outcomes, including complications, postoperative short-term recovery, and pain intensity, were analyzed. RESULTS: We enrolled 297 patients (151 males, mean age 64.9 ± 12.8 years) who had minimally invasive right hemicolectomy. Of these 297 patients, 272 patients had conventional surgery with specimen extraction through mini-laparotomy and 25 patients had NOSE surgery (23 transrectal, 2 transvaginal). The diagnosis of colon disease did not differ significantly between the conventional and NOSE groups. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly (p = 0.004) shorter in the NOSE group (median 5 days, range 3–17 days) than in the conventional group (median 7 days, range 3–45 days). Postoperative pain was significantly (p = 0.026 on postoperative day 1 and p = 0.002 on postoperative day 2) greater in the conventional group than in the NOSE group. CONCLUSIONS: NOSE was associated with acceptable short-term surgical outcomes that were comparable to those of conventional surgery. NOSE results in less postoperative wound pain and a shorter hospital stay than conventional surgery. Larger studies are needed |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7536150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75361502020-10-19 Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? Cheng, C.-C. Hsu, Y.-R. Chern, Y.-J. Tsai, W.-S. Hung, H.-Y. Liao, C.-K. Chiang, J.-M. Hsieh, P.-S. You, J.-F. Tech Coloproctol Multimedia Article BACKGROUND: The transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) approach for right-side colon surgery has been proven to exhibit favorable short-term outcomes. However, thus far, no study has reported the advantages of transrectal NOSE for right-side colon surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the technical feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy using the transrectal NOSE method and those of conventional mini-laparotomy specimen extraction. METHODS: A study was conducted on consecutive patients who had minimally invasive right hemicolectomy either for malignancy or benign disease at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, between January 2017 and December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: conventional surgery with specimen extraction using mini-laparotomy and NOSE surgery. Surgical outcomes, including complications, postoperative short-term recovery, and pain intensity, were analyzed. RESULTS: We enrolled 297 patients (151 males, mean age 64.9 ± 12.8 years) who had minimally invasive right hemicolectomy. Of these 297 patients, 272 patients had conventional surgery with specimen extraction through mini-laparotomy and 25 patients had NOSE surgery (23 transrectal, 2 transvaginal). The diagnosis of colon disease did not differ significantly between the conventional and NOSE groups. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly (p = 0.004) shorter in the NOSE group (median 5 days, range 3–17 days) than in the conventional group (median 7 days, range 3–45 days). Postoperative pain was significantly (p = 0.026 on postoperative day 1 and p = 0.002 on postoperative day 2) greater in the conventional group than in the NOSE group. CONCLUSIONS: NOSE was associated with acceptable short-term surgical outcomes that were comparable to those of conventional surgery. NOSE results in less postoperative wound pain and a shorter hospital stay than conventional surgery. Larger studies are needed Springer International Publishing 2020-07-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7536150/ /pubmed/32632708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02282-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Multimedia Article Cheng, C.-C. Hsu, Y.-R. Chern, Y.-J. Tsai, W.-S. Hung, H.-Y. Liao, C.-K. Chiang, J.-M. Hsieh, P.-S. You, J.-F. Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? |
title | Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? |
title_full | Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? |
title_short | Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? |
title_sort | minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? |
topic | Multimedia Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02282-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengcc minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward AT hsuyr minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward AT chernyj minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward AT tsaiws minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward AT hunghy minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward AT liaock minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward AT chiangjm minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward AT hsiehps minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward AT youjf minimallyinvasiverightcolectomywithtransrectalnaturalorificeextractioncouldthisbethenextstepforward |