Cargando…

DNA methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: The Understanding Society study

INTRODUCTION: The extent of the biological impact of passive smoke exposure is unclear. We sought to investigate the association between passive smoke exposure and DNA methylation, which could serve as a biomarker of health risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We derived passive smoke exposure from self-rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hulls, Paige M., de Vocht, Frank, Bao, Yanchun, Relton, Caroline L., Martin, Richard M., Richmond, Rebecca C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109971
_version_ 1783590530883518464
author Hulls, Paige M.
de Vocht, Frank
Bao, Yanchun
Relton, Caroline L.
Martin, Richard M.
Richmond, Rebecca C.
author_facet Hulls, Paige M.
de Vocht, Frank
Bao, Yanchun
Relton, Caroline L.
Martin, Richard M.
Richmond, Rebecca C.
author_sort Hulls, Paige M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The extent of the biological impact of passive smoke exposure is unclear. We sought to investigate the association between passive smoke exposure and DNA methylation, which could serve as a biomarker of health risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We derived passive smoke exposure from self-reported questionnaire data among smoking and non-smoking partners of participants enrolled in the UK Household Longitudinal Study ‘Understanding Society’ (n=769). We performed an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of passive smoke exposure with DNA methylation in peripheral blood measured using the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC array. RESULTS: No CpG sites surpassed the epigenome-wide significance threshold of p<5.97 × 10(−8) in relation to partner smoking, compared with 10 CpG sites identified in relation to own smoking. However, 10 CpG sites surpassed a less stringent threshold of p<1 × 10(−5) in a model of partner smoking adjusted for own smoking (model 1), 7 CpG sites in a model of partner smoking restricted to non-smokers (model 2) and 16 CpGs in a model restricted to regular smokers (model 3). In addition, there was evidence for an interaction between own smoking status and partners’ smoking status on DNA methylation levels at the majority of CpG sites identified in models 2 and 3. There was a clear lack of enrichment for previously identified smoking signals in the EWAS of passive smoke exposure compared with the EWAS of own smoking. CONCLUSION: The DNA methylation signature associated with passive smoke exposure is much less pronounced than that of own smoking, with no positive findings for ‘expected’ signals. It is unlikely that changes to DNA methylation serve as an important mechanism underlying the health risks of passive smoke exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7536273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75362732020-11-01 DNA methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: The Understanding Society study Hulls, Paige M. de Vocht, Frank Bao, Yanchun Relton, Caroline L. Martin, Richard M. Richmond, Rebecca C. Environ Res Review Article INTRODUCTION: The extent of the biological impact of passive smoke exposure is unclear. We sought to investigate the association between passive smoke exposure and DNA methylation, which could serve as a biomarker of health risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We derived passive smoke exposure from self-reported questionnaire data among smoking and non-smoking partners of participants enrolled in the UK Household Longitudinal Study ‘Understanding Society’ (n=769). We performed an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of passive smoke exposure with DNA methylation in peripheral blood measured using the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC array. RESULTS: No CpG sites surpassed the epigenome-wide significance threshold of p<5.97 × 10(−8) in relation to partner smoking, compared with 10 CpG sites identified in relation to own smoking. However, 10 CpG sites surpassed a less stringent threshold of p<1 × 10(−5) in a model of partner smoking adjusted for own smoking (model 1), 7 CpG sites in a model of partner smoking restricted to non-smokers (model 2) and 16 CpGs in a model restricted to regular smokers (model 3). In addition, there was evidence for an interaction between own smoking status and partners’ smoking status on DNA methylation levels at the majority of CpG sites identified in models 2 and 3. There was a clear lack of enrichment for previously identified smoking signals in the EWAS of passive smoke exposure compared with the EWAS of own smoking. CONCLUSION: The DNA methylation signature associated with passive smoke exposure is much less pronounced than that of own smoking, with no positive findings for ‘expected’ signals. It is unlikely that changes to DNA methylation serve as an important mechanism underlying the health risks of passive smoke exposure. Elsevier 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7536273/ /pubmed/32745538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109971 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Hulls, Paige M.
de Vocht, Frank
Bao, Yanchun
Relton, Caroline L.
Martin, Richard M.
Richmond, Rebecca C.
DNA methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: The Understanding Society study
title DNA methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: The Understanding Society study
title_full DNA methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: The Understanding Society study
title_fullStr DNA methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: The Understanding Society study
title_full_unstemmed DNA methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: The Understanding Society study
title_short DNA methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: The Understanding Society study
title_sort dna methylation signature of passive smoke exposure is less pronounced than active smoking: the understanding society study
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109971
work_keys_str_mv AT hullspaigem dnamethylationsignatureofpassivesmokeexposureislesspronouncedthanactivesmokingtheunderstandingsocietystudy
AT devochtfrank dnamethylationsignatureofpassivesmokeexposureislesspronouncedthanactivesmokingtheunderstandingsocietystudy
AT baoyanchun dnamethylationsignatureofpassivesmokeexposureislesspronouncedthanactivesmokingtheunderstandingsocietystudy
AT reltoncarolinel dnamethylationsignatureofpassivesmokeexposureislesspronouncedthanactivesmokingtheunderstandingsocietystudy
AT martinrichardm dnamethylationsignatureofpassivesmokeexposureislesspronouncedthanactivesmokingtheunderstandingsocietystudy
AT richmondrebeccac dnamethylationsignatureofpassivesmokeexposureislesspronouncedthanactivesmokingtheunderstandingsocietystudy