Cargando…
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map
Objectives: In health sciences, the Delphi technique is primarily used by researchers when the available knowledge is incomplete or subject to uncertainty and other methods that provide higher levels of evidence cannot be used. The aim is to collect expert-based judgments and often to use them to id...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 |
_version_ | 1783590536966307840 |
---|---|
author | Niederberger, Marlen Spranger, Julia |
author_facet | Niederberger, Marlen Spranger, Julia |
author_sort | Niederberger, Marlen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: In health sciences, the Delphi technique is primarily used by researchers when the available knowledge is incomplete or subject to uncertainty and other methods that provide higher levels of evidence cannot be used. The aim is to collect expert-based judgments and often to use them to identify consensus. In this map, we provide an overview of the fields of application for Delphi techniques in health sciences in this map and discuss the processes used and the quality of the findings. We use systematic reviews of Delphi techniques for the map, summarize their findings and examine them from a methodological perspective. Methods: Twelve systematic reviews of Delphi techniques from different sectors of the health sciences were identified and systematically analyzed. Results: The 12 systematic reviews show, that Delphi studies are typically carried out in two to three rounds with a deliberately selected panel of experts. A large number of modifications to the Delphi technique have now been developed. Significant weaknesses exist in the quality of the reporting. Conclusion: Based on the results, there is a need for clarification with regard to the methodological approaches of Delphi techniques, also with respect to any modification. Criteria for evaluating the quality of their execution and reporting also appear to be necessary. However, it should be noted that we cannot make any statements about the quality of execution of the Delphi studies but rather our results are exclusively based on the reported findings of the systematic reviews. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7536299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75362992020-10-16 Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map Niederberger, Marlen Spranger, Julia Front Public Health Public Health Objectives: In health sciences, the Delphi technique is primarily used by researchers when the available knowledge is incomplete or subject to uncertainty and other methods that provide higher levels of evidence cannot be used. The aim is to collect expert-based judgments and often to use them to identify consensus. In this map, we provide an overview of the fields of application for Delphi techniques in health sciences in this map and discuss the processes used and the quality of the findings. We use systematic reviews of Delphi techniques for the map, summarize their findings and examine them from a methodological perspective. Methods: Twelve systematic reviews of Delphi techniques from different sectors of the health sciences were identified and systematically analyzed. Results: The 12 systematic reviews show, that Delphi studies are typically carried out in two to three rounds with a deliberately selected panel of experts. A large number of modifications to the Delphi technique have now been developed. Significant weaknesses exist in the quality of the reporting. Conclusion: Based on the results, there is a need for clarification with regard to the methodological approaches of Delphi techniques, also with respect to any modification. Criteria for evaluating the quality of their execution and reporting also appear to be necessary. However, it should be noted that we cannot make any statements about the quality of execution of the Delphi studies but rather our results are exclusively based on the reported findings of the systematic reviews. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7536299/ /pubmed/33072683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 Text en Copyright © 2020 Niederberger and Spranger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Niederberger, Marlen Spranger, Julia Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map |
title | Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map |
title_full | Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map |
title_fullStr | Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map |
title_full_unstemmed | Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map |
title_short | Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map |
title_sort | delphi technique in health sciences: a map |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33072683 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niederbergermarlen delphitechniqueinhealthsciencesamap AT sprangerjulia delphitechniqueinhealthsciencesamap |