Cargando…
Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region
Manual count of mitotic figures, which is determined in the tumor region with the highest mitotic activity, is a key parameter of most tumor grading schemes. It can be, however, strongly dependent on the area selection due to uneven mitotic figure distribution in the tumor section. We aimed to asses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73246-2 |
_version_ | 1783590566107283456 |
---|---|
author | Aubreville, Marc Bertram, Christof A. Marzahl, Christian Gurtner, Corinne Dettwiler, Martina Schmidt, Anja Bartenschlager, Florian Merz, Sophie Fragoso, Marco Kershaw, Olivia Klopfleisch, Robert Maier, Andreas |
author_facet | Aubreville, Marc Bertram, Christof A. Marzahl, Christian Gurtner, Corinne Dettwiler, Martina Schmidt, Anja Bartenschlager, Florian Merz, Sophie Fragoso, Marco Kershaw, Olivia Klopfleisch, Robert Maier, Andreas |
author_sort | Aubreville, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | Manual count of mitotic figures, which is determined in the tumor region with the highest mitotic activity, is a key parameter of most tumor grading schemes. It can be, however, strongly dependent on the area selection due to uneven mitotic figure distribution in the tumor section. We aimed to assess the question, how significantly the area selection could impact the mitotic count, which has a known high inter-rater disagreement. On a data set of 32 whole slide images of H&E-stained canine cutaneous mast cell tumor, fully annotated for mitotic figures, we asked eight veterinary pathologists (five board-certified, three in training) to select a field of interest for the mitotic count. To assess the potential difference on the mitotic count, we compared the mitotic count of the selected regions to the overall distribution on the slide. Additionally, we evaluated three deep learning-based methods for the assessment of highest mitotic density: In one approach, the model would directly try to predict the mitotic count for the presented image patches as a regression task. The second method aims at deriving a segmentation mask for mitotic figures, which is then used to obtain a mitotic density. Finally, we evaluated a two-stage object-detection pipeline based on state-of-the-art architectures to identify individual mitotic figures. We found that the predictions by all models were, on average, better than those of the experts. The two-stage object detector performed best and outperformed most of the human pathologists on the majority of tumor cases. The correlation between the predicted and the ground truth mitotic count was also best for this approach (0.963–0.979). Further, we found considerable differences in position selection between pathologists, which could partially explain the high variance that has been reported for the manual mitotic count. To achieve better inter-rater agreement, we propose to use a computer-based area selection for support of the pathologist in the manual mitotic count. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7536430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75364302020-10-07 Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region Aubreville, Marc Bertram, Christof A. Marzahl, Christian Gurtner, Corinne Dettwiler, Martina Schmidt, Anja Bartenschlager, Florian Merz, Sophie Fragoso, Marco Kershaw, Olivia Klopfleisch, Robert Maier, Andreas Sci Rep Article Manual count of mitotic figures, which is determined in the tumor region with the highest mitotic activity, is a key parameter of most tumor grading schemes. It can be, however, strongly dependent on the area selection due to uneven mitotic figure distribution in the tumor section. We aimed to assess the question, how significantly the area selection could impact the mitotic count, which has a known high inter-rater disagreement. On a data set of 32 whole slide images of H&E-stained canine cutaneous mast cell tumor, fully annotated for mitotic figures, we asked eight veterinary pathologists (five board-certified, three in training) to select a field of interest for the mitotic count. To assess the potential difference on the mitotic count, we compared the mitotic count of the selected regions to the overall distribution on the slide. Additionally, we evaluated three deep learning-based methods for the assessment of highest mitotic density: In one approach, the model would directly try to predict the mitotic count for the presented image patches as a regression task. The second method aims at deriving a segmentation mask for mitotic figures, which is then used to obtain a mitotic density. Finally, we evaluated a two-stage object-detection pipeline based on state-of-the-art architectures to identify individual mitotic figures. We found that the predictions by all models were, on average, better than those of the experts. The two-stage object detector performed best and outperformed most of the human pathologists on the majority of tumor cases. The correlation between the predicted and the ground truth mitotic count was also best for this approach (0.963–0.979). Further, we found considerable differences in position selection between pathologists, which could partially explain the high variance that has been reported for the manual mitotic count. To achieve better inter-rater agreement, we propose to use a computer-based area selection for support of the pathologist in the manual mitotic count. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7536430/ /pubmed/33020510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73246-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Aubreville, Marc Bertram, Christof A. Marzahl, Christian Gurtner, Corinne Dettwiler, Martina Schmidt, Anja Bartenschlager, Florian Merz, Sophie Fragoso, Marco Kershaw, Olivia Klopfleisch, Robert Maier, Andreas Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region |
title | Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region |
title_full | Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region |
title_fullStr | Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region |
title_short | Deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region |
title_sort | deep learning algorithms out-perform veterinary pathologists in detecting the mitotically most active tumor region |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7536430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73246-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aubrevillemarc deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT bertramchristofa deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT marzahlchristian deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT gurtnercorinne deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT dettwilermartina deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT schmidtanja deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT bartenschlagerflorian deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT merzsophie deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT fragosomarco deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT kershawolivia deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT klopfleischrobert deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion AT maierandreas deeplearningalgorithmsoutperformveterinarypathologistsindetectingthemitoticallymostactivetumorregion |